Hi,
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:24:41AM +0100, Mark Wielaard via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:21:20PM -0700, David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss
> wrote:
> > On 3/24/23 13:56, Ben Woodard via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
> > >Tangential to Scott's request, one of the requests fr
I'm sorry Scott, I did not intend to hijack your proposal. In essence, I
was saying that I support a the registry part of your proposal below.
That has been one of the long time requests from the tool developers
that I work with.
On 3/24/23 13:21, Linder, Scott via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
[AMD O
Hi -
> I understand the desire for each particular vendor opcode to have a
> semantic meaning that is fixed throughout time. [...] Does this
> continue to be an goal for DWARF6? Whether or not this is true, we
> should make this explicit. If not, it would provide an opportunity
> for tool develo
> Vector registers
>
> It has been the long standing existing practice to treat hardware
> vector registers as arrays of a fundamental base type. To deliniate
> these hardware register arrays from arrays in the language source they
> have been given the DW_AT_GNU_vector attribute. This proposal sim
