On 2022-05-09 22:41, Robinson, Paul wrote:
>> Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 2022-05-09 16:48, Ron Brender via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
>>> So my suggestion is to file a bug report with CLANG, requesting they
>> correct their DWARF output to reflect all details needed
>>> by your language.
>>
>> An issue her
On 2022-05-06 18:11, Lancelot SIX via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
> 2 - Unnamed zero sized bitfield
>
> Another case we met is related to unnamed fields with a size of 0 bits.
> Such field is defined in the c++ standard as (in 9.6 Bit-Fields):
>
> > As a special case, an unnamed bit-field with a width
On 5/10/22 02:15, Pedro Alves via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
But still, at the language level, the types ARE different. And DWARF is
also about language source to machine code mapping. C/C++ don't let you take
the
address of a bitfield, for example, so it's possible type expressions in the
debugge
On 5/10/22 04:10, Pedro Alves via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
On 2022-05-06 18:11, Lancelot SIX via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
2 - Unnamed zero sized bitfield
Another case we met is related to unnamed fields with a size of 0 bits.
Such field is defined in the c++ standard as (in 9.6 Bit-Fields):
> As a
