On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 08:35 -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> On 04/02/14 03:43, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 18:42 -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> >> On 04/01/14 13:54, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>
> >>> What about using the presence of a DW_AT_external attribute on the data
> >>> object
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:21 -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > To make it possible to quickly see whether an address (range) is covered
> > by an ELF file containing DWARF information two proposals were made:
> >
> > aranges does not have debug info length
> > http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=10
> > A default location list entry (as proposed in 130121.1) gives the
> location
> > of an object for address values which are not otherwise specified in
> the
> > location list.
>
> Maybe an example of this would be helpful too. I am under the (wrong)
> impression that a default location list ent
On 04/03/14 01:51, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 08:35 -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
Perhaps you are confused by the following from Section 2.6 (which I think
is unambiguous):
1. Single location descriptions, which are a language independent
representation of addressing
