Re: Making URLconfs accept view objects, not just paths to views

2006-05-07 Thread olive
+1 We already have to import models to use generic views, then, for the sake of consistency, it seems normal to have to import views as well. Yes, keep objects as objects everywhere is possible. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are sub

Graham Dumpleton about mod_python

2006-08-18 Thread olive
Hi folks, Have you read the following from Django Comments, what do you think of it ? Graham Dumpleton August 17, 2006 at 11:59 p.m. You really need to provide an explanation of why the worker MPM cannot be used and the prefork MPM must be used. The reason is that this doesn't make a lot of sen

Re: Graham Dumpleton about mod_python

2006-08-18 Thread olive
Malcom, The context of this comment is http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/modpython/#c2029 What I would like to know is if something has been done or will be to ensure that Django works along with mod_python 3.3. As far as I understand this will allow us to run any taste of Apache in an

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-03-02 Thread olive
+1 for me On Mar 1, 5:19 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/1/07, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about bug #2282? What's the actual status? A patch is proposed, > > it doesn't suit any case but it's a good start for a part of the > > world. > > It still need

Re: Newforms: colon after label

2007-03-30 Thread olive
A BIG +1 for me On 29 mar, 16:34, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/07, Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Were I work we have had to do this very thing to support I18N in our > > forms. Something as simple as a ":" is not a given. Maybe I want a > > " :" instead? This could

Re: installperms and/or sqlinitialdata

2006-04-10 Thread olive
Yes, what you need is: python manage.py syncdb Olivier. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-13 Thread olive
James, to make it work I had to replace in your views all occurences of: ManyToOne by ForeignKey ManyToMany by ManyToManyField The only problem for me so far is that TextField are no more handled by TinyMCE. Just one reproach: the widget use for ManyToMany was better before Dojo (MultiSelect co

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-13 Thread olive
My copy of MR has been updated yesterday evening. How do I specify the use of Dojo rich-text editing widget in my model ? I don't know why M2M does not render properly, here is an excerpt of the displayed page source: ... dojo.setModulePrefix('django', '../django'); var admi

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-13 Thread olive
What I see is a simple multiselection list, so I suspect that the related Dojo is not loaded. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-d

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-13 Thread olive
Sorry, I came back to the version MR version I had two days ago and it is better now. But the filter above the left list does not work, JS console says: Erreur : SelectFilter is not defined Fichier source : http://localhost:8000/media/js/dojo/dojo.js Ligne : 187 Erreur : SelectFilter is not defi

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-14 Thread olive
in fact, since I've rolled back to a 3 days old version I no longer need to do this modification. If it happens again wih a fresher svn update I will let you know. Now I'm convinced that we need Dojo, I will help as much as I can. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You recei

Re: Django/Dojo integration: take a look and speak up

2006-04-14 Thread olive
in fact, since I've rolled back to a 3 days old version I no longer need to do this modification. If it happens again wih a fresher svn update I will let you know. Now I'm convinced that we need Dojo, I will help as much as I can. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You recei

Porting from Django 0.96 to 1.0 doc improvement

2008-09-07 Thread olive
Hello, I had hard time to find that I need to add primary_key=True to my OneToOneFields to make it work as with 0,96. I still don't understand why I need add that for 1.0. Could you please add some lines about this in the doc ? Thanks again for Django 1.0, Olivier. --~--~-~--~~---