#717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

2010-08-09 Thread julianb
#717 was posted 5 years ago and closed as wontfix, supposedly cause Django was in it's early stages and it was not an important issue. I propose that it's getting reopened and fixed now. Like the ticket description says, in ConditionalGetMiddleWare the Last- Modified date is checked for exact matc

Re: #717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

2010-08-09 Thread julianb
On Aug 9, 11:46 pm, Łukasz Rekucki wrote: > On 9 August 2010 22:48, Paul McMillan wrote:> I agree with > the person who closed the ticket again, since this should > > have been discussed on the mailing list prior to re-opening it. > > That would be me ;) Okay, I'm sorry. I somehow forgot the ru

Re: #717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

2010-08-16 Thread julianb
I just discovered that the condition decorator does check for exact match only, too. Thus, the ticket should be changed to also include this issue. Is someone going to reopen the ticket? On Aug 9, 11:46 pm, Łukasz Rekucki wrote: > On 9 August 2010 22:48, Paul McMillan wrote:> I agree with > the

URL dispatcher fallthrough?

2013-03-18 Thread julianb
Hi, imagine the following use case: You build an online store where you have sorted products into several categories and maybe associated an occasion. Now you want to build URLs. So the URL schema that all of the store's owners agree on is: // // // Look simple. Because product slugs should

Re: URL dispatcher fallthrough?

2013-03-19 Thread julianb
that in the real world this is easier > said than done. So it would be nice to have an idiomatic solution. > > An alternative might be a kwarg on the url function, such as > 'fallthrough_on_404'. But it all feels a bit hackish to me :/ > > Regards, > Andy > >

Re: #717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

2010-09-21 Thread julianb
Uuh, so what's with this? Nothing happened with the ticket and no further comments here either... :( On Aug 9, 12:28 pm, julianb wrote: > #717 was posted 5 years ago and closed as wontfix, supposedly cause > Django was in it's early stages and it was not an important issue. I >

Re: Call for testing: new docs

2008-08-20 Thread julianb
I have just a tiny suggestions... could you make the headlines a bit bigger or with more space around them? When scrolling, there is no real distinction between different parts. I always found that a bit unusable in the Django docs. You just have a large stream of text and your eyes are unable to

Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread julianb
On Aug 30, 9:31 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The latest docs will always be at //dev/; versions frozen with > each release will be at ///. On this occasion, why not change "New in Django development version" remarks to "New in this version"? That makes much more sense, sin

Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-31 Thread julianb
On Aug 31, 12:07 am, "Ramiro Morales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From what i?ve heard I'd say facilities offered by Sphinx > (seehttp://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/para.html#dir-versionadded) > are going to be used for this. That would be good then. Currently it is written directly as text, which s

URL mapping and percent-encoded reserved characters

2008-10-16 Thread julianb
Hi, currently it seems that the URL dispatcher makes no difference between e.g. "/" and "%2F", which is the same if you decode it but has special meaning in URLs. The "/" separates path segments and you would have to encode it to "%2F" if used in such a segment. (http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Perc

Re: URL mapping and percent-encoded reserved characters

2008-10-16 Thread julianb
Oh, I just discovered that it only makes no difference on the development server. On Apache you get a "Not Found" page, a raw and unusual one, when replacing "/" with "%2F". --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: Decision for ticket #6362 - Remove blank spaces with strip when validating the data

2009-05-13 Thread julianb
On May 13, 2:56 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > We need to wait until we're not trying to get v1.1 out the door. Since the ticket is one year old, that time had come and passed. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Streaming sitemaps

2013-07-25 Thread julianb
Since 1.5 we have streaming responses. What is the state of contrib.sitemaps in this regard? I have some very large sitemaps and experimented with making them faster a few years ago. If the do not yet stream, I think this would be a good idea to get memory usage down. Is there anything to keep

Re: Streaming sitemaps

2013-07-26 Thread julianb
I don't think the queryset needs to be loaded into memory. There is an iterator() method available: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/querysets/#iterator On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:56:09 AM UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for the suggestion. This is an

Re: Streaming sitemaps

2013-07-29 Thread julianb
But then it still makes it better on the Python side. You still have psycopg memory problems but don't you have that now all the time anyways? On Friday, July 26, 2013 11:50:57 AM UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > On 26 juil. 2013, at 09:40, julianb > > wrote: > > >