everal different pyyaml versions (from 6.0 down to
5.1.2).
Do I miss something or it is a valid issue for opening a ticket?
Thanks,
Sergey Fursov
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
T
produces a different output than provided in docs
воскресенье, 26 декабря 2021 г. в 22:21:42 UTC+3, Sergey Fursov:
> Hi there,
>
> Before opening a ticket I would like to discuss my problem here.
>
> Django docs say:
>
> ```
> YAML¶ <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0
/15250
>
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 08:13, Sergey Fursov wrote:
>
>> Please, disregard the part about failing tests, I had an old version
>> locally without this commit applied
>> https://github.com/django/django/commit/a57c783dd4e6dc73847081221827a1902eede88b
>>
Hi everyone,
In our company, we also use the ability to define our own indexes, but with
the current implementation of base Index class, we basically need to copy
several methods entirely from it.
What do we want is implement UNIQUE indexes with the UPPER function wrapper
around field names [1].
T
Hi everyone,
I just want to mention here that in django-jsonfield repo proposed solution
to solve this problem on third party side:
https://github.com/dmkoch/django-jsonfield/issues/189. Maybe this is the
better way.
Thanks,
Sergey
2017-06-03 0:02 GMT+03:00 Zack Voase :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm encoun