Hello i opened a ticket, but somone suggest me to discuss this new
feature here.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13900
i would like to edit
django.contrib.admin.options.ModelAdmin?.delete_view and add a helpful
feature.
Instead of deleting all the nested objects, the delete_view could
h
rm will make us
choose objects from 3 to 10, the use choose to substitute with object
3 and all Banana and Apple in the database will be replaced with a
Tree, using the queryset update method.
is it clear?
On 7 Lug, 15:20, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Ric wrote:
:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Ric wrote:
> > Hello i opened a ticket, but somone suggest me to discuss this new
> > feature here.
>
> >http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13900
> >
> > i would like to edit
> > django.contrib.admin.options
i'll reply one by one
* What if you have multiple models referring to Author? Do you
assume
that every related model will be updated the same way?
* What if you have multiple foreign keys from Blog to Author? Do you
assume that every foreign key on a single model will be updated in
the
same way
laced with
"{{ replace_object_name }}":{% endif %}
2.
form rendering
what do you think? am i missing something?
how can i do such a prototype? i mean, how i propose to django
comunity such a prototype?
thanks
On Jul 10, 8:27 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010
yeah i know it can be done...
i can try to write it in future... it can be a subclass of something,
i have to open the code.
could be an interesting contribute?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send e
oh fantastic... but i read about security issue...
and what about create a model, save the traceback in the db, and
reopen it from the admin?
On 12 Nov, 03:39, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Ric wrote:
> > yeah i know it can be done...
>
> > i can
yes of course i've read it in the documentation... i'v snv the code
right now!
sorry, i missed it.
On 13 Nov, 15:03, Benjamin Wohlwend wrote:
> Hi Riccardo,
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Ric wrote:
>
> > and what about create a model, save the traceback in th
the field class define this code
def formfield(self, form_class=forms.CharField, **kwargs):
"""
Returns a django.forms.Field instance for this database Field.
"""
defaults = {'required': not self.blank,
'label': capfirst(self.verbose_name),
yes but definitely not the current code, because i cannot subclass
with super
On 14 Nov, 15:46, ptone wrote:
> On Nov 13, 11:55 pm, Ric wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > the field class define this code
>
> > def formfie
a minor bug in django admin.
in django.contrib.admin.options mark_safe is called to render media.
in add_view and change_view we can find mark_safe(media)
in changelist_view media is injected as an object (without mark_safe)
i propose to pass the media object to the template (without
mark_safe),
ceField or forms.CharField)
in that way is no form_class is passed, a default form_class is
defined (TypedChoiceField or CharField)
On 14 Nov, 21:22, Ric wrote:
> yes but definitely not the current code, because i cannot subclass
> with super
>
> On 14 Nov, 15:46, ptone wrote:
>
>
>
i've created a ticket
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17239
sorry but i'm new, i'would like to contribute.
let me know if it's fine.
On 15 Nov, 07:02, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> On 14 nov. 2011, at 23:15, Ric wrote:
>
> > a minor bug in django admin.
>
&
i've been thinking about a new django admin feature, that could be
backward implemented
it's about adding a view permission for models
so we can have
1.change_permission
2.delete_permission
3.add_permission
and
4.view_permission
in the changelist_view view_permission allow user to see the
chang
;
> On 17/11/2011, at 2:47 AM, Ric wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > i've been thinking about a new django admin feature, that could be
> > backward implemented
>
> > it's about adding a view permission for models
>
> > so we can have
>
&g
should i have to open a ticket?
On 14 Nov, 23:19, Ric wrote:
> form_class is not in kwargs if the method is declared like this
>
> def formfield(self, form_class=forms.CharField, **kwargs):
>
> a possible solution is to use a code like this
>
> def formfield(self, **kwar
ok i can give a try...
maybe it's difficult, not to much. i have to see inline models, and
give the right behavior
so from github i can fork django 1.3.1, but actually i'm working with
the latest version.
should i fork the lastest?
On 16 Nov, 20:21, Aymeric Augustin
wrote
On 16 Nov, 20:43, Ric wrote:
> ok i can give a try...
>
> maybe it's difficult, not to much. i have to see inline models, and
> give the right behavior
>
> so from github i can fork django 1.3.1, but actually i'm working with
> the latest version.
>
> shou
fine i'll keep in mind.
On 16 Nov, 22:17, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Hi Ric,
>
> I've noticed that you're posting a lot on this mailing list. Please remember
> that each email sent here is broadcasted to around 7000 people, each of whom
> will need a few seconds
ok this is my last message, i swear!
i've created a new options.py file and a .diff, and i've attached it
to the ticket you send to me.
i've tested it and it works, it's pretty basic and there is more work
to do.
what i've done is to add a method has_view_permission, and check a
view permi
ModelBackend should provide a method to get a fresh instance of
AnonymousUser, and use this method to set a new instance of
AnonymousUser in
django.contrib.auth.get_user and django.contrib.auth.logout
i've created a ticket
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17254
--
You received this message
hi, i want to propose a long term idea.
start using a less framework inside django.
i'm using bootstrap for my django app. it's really cool.
what i'am doing now is writing with less a new css to style django
admin.
my idea is that django should provide a faster way to write an app,
and while dj
a less compiler is needed to make developers add custom variables to
match color scheme they like.
i prefeer using an existing framework, a lot of work less to do, no
docs to make, just a link.
bootstrap it's fantastic, it's well done and is flexible.
django should use a base style, already compi
no no, my point is not to remove admin, you misunderstood me...
what i'm talking about is the extend the current admin version, with a
theme framework.
the theme framework got a default theme, that is the current admin
theme, but then developers can add their own theme.
now making a theme for dj
i've opened a ticket for a small issue in module
django.contrib.gis.measure
the MeasureBase class cannot be subclassed easily, so i've write a new
MeasureBase class to allow developers to implement other Measure class
(like weight, currency and so on)
the code it's here
https://code.djangoprojec
hi, is it possibile to upgrade the jquery library in admin to the
lastest version with the now django 1.4?
for what i've seen there is just one little bug when you use the
select all checkbox in admin changelist, all other javascript works
out of the box
--
You received this message because you
hi,
the default django template need a meta tag for character encoding in
the head
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
Hi there,
i have got a simple approach to make all django fields with a full
i18n support
the django.models.fields.Field class can be subclassed like this
from django.db import models
from django.utils.translation import get_language
class i18nField(models.Field):
def __init__(self, i18n =
this is my proposition to have custom data inside a model field
a json data field, the code is simple as this, and it works with
lastest django release
from django.db import models
from django.core.serializers.json import simplejson, DjangoJSONEncoder
import StringIO
class JsonField(models.Field
call save
method.
we should use the same logic here and encode a json object to string
only when we call the save method, no need for a get_%s_json in the
field api.
On 6 Nov, 01:36, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Ric wrote:
> > this is my proposition to ha
i'm posting this comment into the ticket.
On 6 Nov, 20:14, Ric wrote:
> i'm watching the ticket right now.
> maybe there is no need to to create a class
> JSONDateEncoder(json.JSONEncoder) because there is DjangoJSONEncoder
> already.
> then it would be great to imp
request.url_conf has been added with django 1.3.
in my opinion, the loader object should handle the request, so that
can be sublassed to pass different template folder based on request
params.
i need this feature for my app, is it possible to have different
template folder based on request params
for me a simple solution to this is issue, is that django should be
able to recognize an HttpResponse as error and return it
like:
raise HttpResponseRedirect(url)
or
raise HttpResponse(render_to_template("errors/user_not_logged"),
context = RequestContext(context), status_code = 401)
with this a
it's a good code.
you wrote:
# TODO: Look for date/time/datetime objects within the structure?
and there is no need, because it's handled by djangojsonencoder
On 7 Nov, 07:06, schinckel wrote:
> I'm doing just this in several cases: I packaged up a JSONField into a
> re-usable
> application:htt
#x27;s to create a JsonField, than we can use
validators to let the developers validate non relational data.
On 7 Nov, 12:45, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ric wrote:
> > this is my proposition to have custom data inside a model field
>
> > a json data field, t
that is just a proposition, i know that if you need a non relation db
the best thing to do is to have a non relational data store.
but you need a relational data store only if you need to query non
relational data, in the other cases you can use a relational db,
because relational db got foreign k
hacker!
On 10 Nov, 20:20, Ric wrote:
> that is just a proposition, i know that if you need a non relation db
> the best thing to do is to have a non relational data store.
>
> but you need a relational data store only if you need to query non
> relational data, in the other cas
it was just an idea, Russel... maybe too hard to accomplish in the
right way.
i can use json field in my trunk and that's good for me.
i thought maybe, with validators, django could be be able to
accomplish some of the features of a non relational data store,
without messing up with low lowel dat
the first thing i have thought was that "loader shouldn't care about
the request"
but, request could be an optional argument, that can be none, with
this simple thing i can create a custom template loader, and add
whatever folder i want, based on request.
it's a way to customize a Site. i manage
> If you're using class-based views, override get_templates to provide the
> right templates for the request.
i would like a django-wide feature, to customize admin folder and
third party app.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" grou
i agree with nan, it would be a nice feature.
On 10 Nov, 21:12, Ric wrote:
> > If you're using class-based views, override get_templates to provide the
> > right templates for the request.
>
> i would like a django-wide feature, to customize admin folder and
> third pa
maybe even a simple request.template_folders could do the job...
but it would work only with the new templateresponse class...
On 10 Nov, 21:23, Ric wrote:
> i agree with nan, it would be a nice feature.
>
> On 10 Nov, 21:12, Ric wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
i'm reading other post on this forum
django use pickle to store non relational data with session...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
hi, i receive django email on 500 error.
with that kind of mail is difficult to debug, because i don't have a
lot of informations.
it's much more simple to debug when i set DEBUG = True and i receive
an html technical response.
with that response i can read a lot of informations (like vars,
reque
i don't think so...
the debug response have got a lot of javascript... and a lot of email
client (gmail, outlook) escape javascript and could brake some
functionality of the web page... the safest way, in my opinion, is to
leave the content of email as plain text and to attach the html file
to the
not a lot of javascript, really. just a script to expand the local
vars...
but make a an alternative content it's not easy.
attach the html response it's pretty easy, maybe just a few line of
code and some import
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Djan
46 matches
Mail list logo
