Django Content Negotiation implement

Hi, when https://github.com/django/deps/blob/master/drafts/content-negotiation.rst this dep is to be implemented in django? 1.8? Regards Asif -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscr

Re: Django Content Negotiation implement

suggestions. I'll be trying to enhance my knowledge base about django request response and other related stuffs necessary if you please show me some light to get started or from where actually should I start. Kind Regards Asif On Saturday, November 8, 2014 3:01:28 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin

Re: Django Content Negotiation implement

suggestions. I'll be trying to enhance my knowledge base about django request response and other related stuffs necessary if you please show me some light to get started or from where actually should I start. Kind Regards Asif On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > Thank you

GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

Hi, Although probably It's quite very early to ask about GSOC 2015 in January, I would like to start analyzing to prepare myself for choosing a correct project and submitting a good proposal for that to get selected. I haven't found any GSOC 2015 project ideas pages yet. But got some older ide

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

ous years is likely to be suitable yes. >> >> It would also be very beneficial to familiarise yourself with the >> contributing guidelines for Django[1] and take on some small fixes, perhaps >> in related areas to your interests for GSOC. >> >> Marc >> >

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

project success after having some feedback from core dev teams. Looking forward to some feedback if my initial move is okeyish? ./auvipy On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you both of you for your response with guidelines. > > I foun

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

cle synonym tables > > * port Django i18n and i10 and related translation features to use Babel: > http://babel.pocoo.org/ > > > > Em terça-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2015 14:15:20 UTC-3, Asif Saifuddin > escreveu: > >> Hi, >> >> Although probably It&#x

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > Thank you for your project ideas. I'm going to follow the ideas from > https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2015 > > > for your babel porting probably Aymeric Augustin's template

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

http, url dispatch, middleware and related stuffs. Some guide will help me to dig more and go to proper direction. ./auvipy On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > >> Hi Fabio, >> >> Thank

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

o implement till now? ./auvipy On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > >> Thank you both for the feedback. I will continue my analysis to >> understand django well and also try to contribute some

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

gt;> >>> while it theoretically would be possible to replace all of Django's >>> request/response handling with Werkzeug, there is not much gain in it >>> currently -- especially when considering backwards compatibility etc… >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Fl

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

en added > in the last 5 years, and see if Django is making good use of that feature > internally. If not, propose how we could be doing better. > > Yours, > Russ Magee %-) > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > >> Seems my previous idea is no

Re: RE Composite fields-/ Multi Primary / Foreign keys

Hi Aron, this discussion thread might interest you to collaborate https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!topic/django-developers/MZUcOE6-7GY On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 12:14:19 PM UTC+6, Aron Podrigal wrote: > > Hi, I just came across a project that requires

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

- Ran 9087 tests in 214.033s FAILED (errors=5, skipped=535, expected failures=7) Destroying test database for alias 'default'... Destroying test database for alias 'other'... before that python 3.4.3 was installed under pyenv without b

CSRF cipher in xor + base64 or Vignere cipher

Hi, Just start working on this ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20869 wondering what should be the preferred way ? using XOR or Vignere Cipher? Reagrds -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itse

Re: how to run django in window 8

Hi, This group is for the development of django framework itself. for the type of problem you are facing better post your questions to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/django-users regards On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 8:07:20 AM UTC+6, Alok Rodhiya wrote: > > i spend the overnight in ins

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

stigate the cause. I just installed > Python 3.4.3, however, and don't have the problem there. Now I've > reinstalled 3.4.2 and the error is resolved there as well. > > > On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 2:29:36 PM UTC-5, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >&g

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

ing class-based views in contrib.auth which may be helpful: > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17209 > > On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:05:39 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> About the best practice project idea I'm analyzing contrib apps. I found >> Admin docs app usi

GSoC 2015: Django Best Practices Update

Hi, Having a new thread for my gsoc project idea 2015. Analyzing for more then a month I have decided to work on django best practices updates project. Tim graham and Russels suggestions helped me to have some ideas related to this project. In this thread I hope to have a in depth discussion fo

About Class Based views

Hi, I found this blog post about class based views of django http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/my-approach-to-class-based-views/ what do you guys think about? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django it

Re: Composite fields

but? IRC discussion? On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 9:09:49 PM UTC+6, Thomas Stephenson wrote: > > Not impatient or anything, but... > > Bump. > > On 13 March 2015 at 14:07, Thomas Stephenson > wrote: > >> All the null handling stuff has been removed from the specification and >> replaced with sl

Re: [GSoC] Switching to Jinja2 proposal

Hi, chris, So as django have the jinja 2 support out of the box what do you think the direction of the ticket? https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15667 should the form rendering based on jinja2? or whats on our mind? If you guide me with some direction then I might go for the ticket. looking

Re: queryset caching note in docs

assigned myself to the ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16614 will try to give akarai's patch a try -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

Hi All, during my analyzing and making proposal for django best practices updates (class based view etc) I found this ticket related https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16256 [though closed by a core dev I think this should be addressed to resolve some issues in admin as per https://code.d

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

le it likely needs to be updated to apply cleanly, I don't > imagine that will take more than a few days? > > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> during my analyzing and making proposal for django best pr

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

> fix." > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> I do belive to implement auth patch cleanly wont take more then a few >> days. But I have plans with django admin app and others which will need >> more tasks and also

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

ontrib.auth. You'll also need to > explain your reasoning for addressing a ticket that's been marked as "won't > fix." > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> I do belive to implement auth patch cleanly wont take mor

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

I have updated the proposal with what I'm planning to acheive in the program and updating with my analysis and plans to acheive the goal. still in draft and am editing according the goal I wanted to acheive/implement in this project proposal. -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: GSOC 2015: Django based Management Information System for Institutes

Hi Aymeric, lookign for some feedback from you about my proposal idea its still on going to improve my proposal and im working on it https://gist.github.com/auvipy/1da0d96f826bd8da4d47 On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 7:45:39 PM UTC+6, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > 2015-03-25 14:40 GMT+01:00 Hars

Re: GSOC 2015 project ideas suggestion

Hi, I have been updating my proposal and as the deadline is friday Your feedback will help me to make it better in technical point of view https://gist.github.com/auvipy/1da0d96f826bd8da4d47 Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django develope

Re: 1.9 release planning

How about a 8 month release cycle and having a LTS in every two years and supporting the old LTS atleast 3 years from the release date? there will be 3 version between two LTS. On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 6:13:11 AM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > With the release of 1.8 coming up, it's time to

Re: 1.9 release planning

sp=sharing > > On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 3:20:55 PM UTC-4, Collin Anderson wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 2:31:08 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >>> >>> How about >>> >>> a 8 month release cycle and having a LTS in every two yea

Re: 1.9 release planning

>>>> minor cosmetic comments, but please keep discussion about the content of >>>>> the proposal itself on this mailing list. Also, please let me know of any >>>>> additional questions or complaints that you'd like to see addressed in the >>>>

Re: Any chances to see Django benefit from new Async features of Python 3.5 ?

This might interest you: https://gist.github.com/andrewgodwin/b3f826a879eb84a70625 On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:48:59 PM UTC+6, Benj wrote: >

Re: Major features for 1.9

Probably templete based wizard rendering and tasks in 1.9 would be great! On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 11:19:38 PM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > Currently we have two items on the roadmap: > https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.9Roadmap > > PostgreSQL Full Text Search

SQL ALchemy support on django

Hi, How much difficult it will be to add SQLalchemy support to django? what are the technical difficulties? And which are the ways to add sqlalchemy support to django? As SQLalchemy is separated in core and orm will it be wise to use sqlalchemy core as the backend for django orm? Or through

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

des are available here: > > https://speakerdeck.com/freakboy3742/i-never-meta-model-i-didnt-like > > Video should be available in the next week or so. Short version: it > won't be *trivial*, but it's certainly *possible*, although you're in > undocumented territory, so you

Re: Django ORM query syntax enhancement

this is the PR josh https://github.com/django/django/pull/5443 On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:09:14 PM UTC+6, Josh Smeaton wrote: > > I think you forgot the PR link Alexey. I'd like to have a look at the > changes you've made. I'm not sure about the extensions to F() just yet, I'm > hoping th

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

, 2015 at 2:35:15 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > > Hi, > > > How much difficult it will be to add SQLalchemy support to django? what > are the technical difficulties? And which are the ways to add sqlalchemy > support to django? > > As SQLalchemy is separated in core

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Marcin Nowak wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 5:17:32 PM UTC+1, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> I would like to create an experiemental repo on my github for >> experiementing the sqla support to django orm, hence some useful resource >> in

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

that's an awsome link :) thanks russ. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > > Hi Asif, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > >> I would like to create an experiemental repo on my githu

Re: "Project" vs "App"

Without the part of sitecustomize agree with the other parts. + there should be distinction between projects app and install apps Reagards On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 3:54:40 PM UTC+6, guettli wrote: > > I created a ticket to find a better definition of "Project" vs "App" > > https://code

Bringing some popular must have django tools/packages under django org umbrella

How is the idea? tools like django-debug-toolbar, django-silk, django-taggit, django-filter etc and some more de facto tools under the umbrella of django github org? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Djan

Re: Bringing some popular must have django tools/packages under django org umbrella

ore: What would be the goal? What would you hope would > be accomplished by doing this? > > Thanks, > Collin > > On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 1:27:11 PM UTC-5, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> How is the idea? tools like django-debug-toolbar, django-silk, >> djan

Re: annoyance with Python 3.2 support in Django 1.8

Python 3.2 should be removed as if any one use py3 should use 3.3+ or better the latest stable. best Asif On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 6:36:53 AM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > Django 1.8 is the last version to support Python 3.2. Python 3.2 is > scheduled to be end of life at February 2016

Re: Integrating Django with Tornado's web server

Hi, I used django-websocket-redis for implementing webscet in django project. You could try that. Regards Asif On Monday, September 14, 2009 at 3:30:59 AM UTC+7, Bret Taylor wrote: > > I am one of the authors of Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org/), the > web server/framework we built at Frie

Re: Proposal: use SQLAlchemy Core for query generation

Hi Luke, I have been thinking and researching a lot recently about SQLalchemy and django integration. Now SQLalchemy provides a devlarative orm extension too quite identical to django orm[not same], django has also refactored a lot in db internals with model meta refactore, expressions, new mi

Re: MOSS Award to Django

Awesome awesome !!! awesome!!! :D :D On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 12:19:00 AM UTC+6, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > For those who haven't seen, Mozilla has awarded $150,000 to Django for > work on Channels and request/response improvements lifted from REST > Framework. More

Re: Easy pickings are not that easy for a new contributor

You should read the comments on the specific tickets opened for long under specific components first. and if there isn't any activities for long ask for take over the issue if that suits you. On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 4:44:19 PM UTC+6, Alexander Lyabah wrote: > > > look at tests, as you

Re: CONTRIBUTION TO DJANGO

Hi Heba khan, you could give a look on this old PR of mine to have some idea about what was suggested to you. https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/pull/4824 This type of patch to some popular django 3rd party packages would be easier for you to get started to open source contrib.

Re: Search Refiner - Can anyone skype and help me?

Hi, This group is for development of django itself/internals. for your problem please post to django-users mailing list. Regards, Asif On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 8:43:27 AM UTC+6, eZ_Harry wrote: > > Hello, > > I have stuck making a search refiner for my website and have been stuck > for

Re: Index expressions

Hi Josh, I'm willing to work on django orm improvment for gsoc and considering custom index as a project idea. I have gone through the available resources like dep, POC on class based index, unification of transform API etc. What others stuff do you suggest me to look into to have some concrete

Re: Index expressions

Hi Tim, Thanks for your early input on the issue. I don't think I should compete with any specific proposal which already have another better competitor. I did some research on SQLalchemy backend support on django and relevant improvement long ago before class based index. I will go for a sqla

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

Hi, I will be working on preparing a proposal for sql-alchemy support on django. [thorugh model meta]. Thanks On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:35:15 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > > Hi, > > > How much difficult it will be to add SQLalchemy support to django? what >

Re: Django Integration

Hi, about the DRF integration in django I went through the dep and the branch of tom christies work. He shared his opinion as some one should do the work and he will provide guidance. I still have some interest in the REST parts work. If Tom christie/DSF core team allows. Thanks Asif On Satu

GSoC 2016: Draft Proposal on SQLAlchemy Integration with django

Hi, I have been working for preparing a proposal on SqlAlchemy integration with django. While I haven't done with in detail proposal and in depth technical specs, I'm posting my very draft proposal to understand If the broader strokes of my approach are nearly OK and I should proceed with the c

Re: GSoC 2016: Draft Proposal on SQLAlchemy Integration with django

let the core devs properly understand and comment on? Best Reagards, Asif On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 6:11:12 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been working for preparing a proposal on SqlAlchemy integration > with django. While I haven't done with in

Re: URL dispatching framework: feedback requested

Can we expect this to be merged on 1.10 alpha? after that the minor imporvements could be take place. Thanks On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 10:23:19 PM UTC+6, Marten Kenbeek wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This past week I've made some great progress in rewriting the URL > dispatcher framework and

Re: Better form fields for django.contrib.postgres.fields

Hi, The first step is the ticket need to be accepted and then push the change as pull request on master branch. Thanks On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 6:56:43 PM UTC+6, Paul Martin wrote: > > Hi, > > This is my first time contributing to Django. It's a lot of different > features in one to improve

Rewriting admin internals

Hi, the admin app of django is consists of many old day codes. How about rewriting it with present day approaches? adopting ideas from django-admin2 where possible? and how about using jinja2 templates as default for admin? thanks, asif -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Rewriting admin internals

Hi is_null, form refactor is an important part but that shouldn't stop us from starting the process. thanks On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 3:19:36 PM UTC+6, is_null wrote: > > Shouldn't the forms refactor happen first ? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: Rewriting admin internals

Hi jacob, happy to see your insightful reply. I think I'm going to start the process with a draft dep soon and I'm planning to devote my engagement in the development too. Will keep you suggestions in mind :) thanks, Asif On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 2:45:42 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifu

Re: Rewriting admin internals

t; > I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but I really want to make sure you > understand exactly what you're proposing here. If you want to be > successful, you need to demonstrate your ability to make progress where so > many others have tried and failed. > > Jacob > &

Re: Rewriting admin internals

Hi Tom, > I'd suggest that a side-project of redesigning the Django Admin from scratch isn't a realistic goal. I also think that working on existing outstanding ticket first and trying to solve issues incrementally would be a good approach? Thanks On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 3:28:09 PM UTC+6

Re: SQL ALchemy support on django

UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > > Hi, > > I will be working on preparing a proposal for sql-alchemy support on > django. [thorugh model meta]. > > Thanks > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:35:15 PM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> Hi, >&g

Re: Using "py2" Trac keyword to tag Python 2-specific issues

Hi Tim, If you need help while removing support of python2 from code base you could knock me. Thanks On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 12:34:23 AM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > I've started tagging Python 2-specific Trac tickets with the "py2" > keyword. You can view such issues using: > > https://co

Re: I'm looking for a part-time job in Django

Hi uri, this list is for development of django internals/itself only. Reagrds, Asif On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 1:27:19 PM UTC+6, uri wrote: > > To django-d...@googlegroups.com , > > I'm looking for a part-time job in Django, do you know anything? I live in > Herzliya, Israel. I can't relocat

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

Hi Tom, I am basically +1 to see this change in the django core. The package is 3 years old and should be tested enough. If you/other core team members thinks that now is a good time to include it to core and deprecation of older API, then I will be willing to work and send PR for this. Lookin

Re: django-formtools is neglected/unmaintained

Hi Tim, In case there is lack of active maintainers for the project then you could add me to the list of maintainers. I do contribute to django eco system regularly. my github activities: github.com/auvipy And about moving to jazzband, I do take part in django-admin2 maintenance there with

Re: status of 1.11 release blockers

Hi, this feature https://github.com/django/django/pull/7482 will also be a very good inclusion. Thanks On Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 5:16:51 AM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > Time to kickoff the progress tracker for the next major release! > > The 1.11 alpha is currently scheduled for January

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

Hi, I have started work on https://github.com/django/django/pull/7783 for converting django built in generic views to django-vanilla-views. I would like to hear what you think before I proceed for more. Thanks, Asif On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 1:37:36 AM UTC+6, Asif Saifuddin wrote

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

rent GCBV implementations - it would > require all users to rewrite their CBV's. Possibly the documentation could > recommend django-vanilla-views? > > On 3 January 2017 at 13:02, Asif Saifuddin > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have started work on https://github.

Re: Error after installing django-tracking2 package for tracking user activity

Hi, This mailing list for for discussing the development of django internals. For your queries please post in django-users list. Thanks On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 6:30:33 PM UTC+6, Gunwant Suryawanshi wrote: > > Hi, > I am trying to track user activity on my website, for that purpose I a

Re: Django 2.0 Python version support (Python 3.6+ only?)

Hi, django 2.0 will be released in december 2017 and ubuntu 18.04 will be released in april 2018 which will default atleast 3.6, so I think this should also be taken as consideration while deciding. Thanks On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 1:00:00 AM UTC+6, Tim Graham wrote: > > August 2016: P

Re: Django 2.0 Python version support (Python 3.6+ only?)

Hi Josh, I do agree and support your idea's. How about pointing/recommend pyenv for deployment in the doc? Thanks, Asif On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 4:38:52 PM UTC+6, Josh Smeaton wrote: > > I guess I don't really see how we'd be helping users in any meaningful way > by supporting python 3.4

Re: Django 2.0 Python version support (Python 3.6+ only?)

discussion and not >> something we really need to promote. pyenv deals with making a particular >> installed python *available*, it doesn't handle the installation of that >> python. >> >> On Sunday, 8 January 2017 22:30:44 UTC+11, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >

Re: How to Integrate Django with Angular 2

This is not the place to ask such kind of questions, please post to django-users as this list is for discussing django internals. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 1:08:29 AM UTC+6, Mohit Saran wrote: > > How to Integrate Django with Angular 2 > -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: Composite key development

Hi Julian, I have been also reviewing and studying the previous works, deps, discussions, codes and tickets. I have also been working to prepare a new dep based on the previous works. Like what Michal said, from my observation, I found the works and approaches of Michal is quite better and it'

Re: Composite key development

Hi Roger, I do agree with your points. I have some thoughts which I will share in Dep/mailing list soon. Thanks On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:10:38 PM UTC+6, Craig Kerstiens wrote: > > Hi all, > > My company (Citus Data) is interested in sponsoring some Django work. In > particular work o

Re: Composite key development

rver > pattern for data binding. But I’m going to have to dig deeper into the > implementation to get a clearer idea. > > It’d be great if you could publish your work-in-progress at some point so > we can discuss the approach in more detail. > > Thanks, > > Julien

GSOC 2017 Project Idea - Improve ORM by introducing real VirtualField and related field clean up

Hi, I have been working on understanding previous works related to composite ForeiegnKey/PrimaryKey support/ VirtualField support, works/tickets on Fields API/RelationField API improvement/clean ups etc. Is it a good idea to prepare something like this for gsoc this year? I have also trying to

Re: GSOC 2017 Project Idea - Improve ORM by introducing real VirtualField and related field clean up

proposal of that complexity for this summer. A prospective student would > need to demonstrate significant understanding of the ORM before I would > advise them to tackle that topic. > > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:16:02 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

Re: HMVC implementation on django

Hi, This question should be posted in django-users mailing list, as this list is for discussing about django internals. Anyway, you could read the answer here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31914098/djangos-equivalent-of-php-codeigniters-hmvc Thanks On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 7:20:58 P

Re: Django ORM query syntax enhancement

Hi Aric, I checked your package. it's nice too. thanks for the work. Asif On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 4:38:26 AM UTC+6, Aric Coady wrote: > > +1. I implemented much the same thing for part of django-model-values > , but went with F > expre

Re: Composite key development

>> >> This would give a chance to get the work done in incremental pieces. >> Doing this all in one go is such a large task that there is a big risk of >> not getting this done at all. >> >> Whatever approach you take, I really hope you'll be able to work o

Re: proposal: add special subclass of ForeignKey for storing ContentTypes

Hi Sergey, I was also wondering why GenericForeignKey don't have direct subclass of ForeignKey while writing a dep about field API improvement. Though I am not 100% sure your implementation. Thanks for bringing it up. On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 2:46:31 AM UTC+6, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: >

Re: Proposal: django.contrib.mysql

Hi Adam, How about making the package official extension and bring under django org? Thanks, Asif On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 9:22:04 PM UTC+6, Adam Johnson wrote: > > Update: I decided not to try merge django-mysql as django.contrib.mysql > because I think it's an advantage to have it as a sepa