Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

2019-04-07 Thread Asif Saif Uddin
You can open a work in progress pr to fix them one by one gradually and trying to fix some of them will give you a much better understanding of django orm internals as it is considered the most complex part of the framework. This will also improve your chance to represent yourself as a much str

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

2019-04-07 Thread Kiran Capoor
Yes, as a personal project sure thing. If you need help ask on django users or respective forum. Contributing to Open Source doesn't really mean to start with GSoC. Start with a pet project and keep working on it. Good luck! Regards, Kiran Capoor On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:10 AM Ashik Meerankutty

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

2019-04-07 Thread Tim Graham
MariaDB is supported (see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29548). The test failures are (as the error message says) because you haven't installed the timezone definitions. On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 3:03:14 AM UTC-4, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > You can open a work in progress pr to fix the

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

2019-04-07 Thread Mariusz Felisiak
Django 2.0 is no longer supported. W dniu sobota, 6 kwietnia 2019 18:52:21 UTC+2 użytkownik Uri Even-Chen napisał: > > Don't forget 2.0. > > I updated my project to use psycopg2==2.7.7 until we upgrade to Django 2.2. > > אורי > u...@speedy.net > -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

2019-04-07 Thread Sage M.A.
Thanks for the information Asif, but it turns out Django already supports MariaDB. On Sunday, 7 April 2019 14:03:14 UTC+7, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > You can open a work in progress pr to fix them one by one gradually and > trying to fix some of them will give you a much better understanding of

Re: GSoC Proposal: Add Cross-DB JSONField, ArrayField, and HStoreField

2019-04-07 Thread Sage M.A.
I see, thanks for the info! Why is the ticket still open, though? Also, I still found one failing window test case.. On Sunday, 7 April 2019 16:20:13 UTC+7, Tim Graham wrote: > > MariaDB is supported (see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29548). > The test failures are (as the error message

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

2019-04-07 Thread Ashik Meerankutty
Scot, Thank you for your feedback. Do you have any suggestions? On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:11 AM Scot Hacker wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 6:03:29 AM UTC-7, Ashik Meerankutty wrote: >> >> Please review and comment my draft proposal for GSOC 2019 >> Draft >>

Re: Specifying model relationship as string vs concrete model class

2019-04-07 Thread Mohit Solanki
I know this group is for django development, posting it here because I want to here from core django devs. On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 9:23:45 AM UTC+5:30, Mohit Solanki wrote: > > Since Django allows specifying relationship between models by both as a > string or by a model class > "models.Fore

Re: Specifying model relationship as string vs concrete model class

2019-04-07 Thread Collin Anderson
models.Foreignkey(User) is a more pythonic and allows more better analysis by tools like flake8, but in some cases you need to create the ForeignKey before User is defined, so you _have_ to use a string. Example: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/stable/ref/models/fields/#foreignkey On Sat, Apr 6

Fellow Reports - April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread Mariusz Felisiak
Week ending April 7, 2019. *Triaged:* https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30302 - model_to_dict() should return an empty dict for an empty list of fields. (accepted) https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30304 - Support setting Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite on the language cookie (accepted) https

Re: GSoC Proposal (FormSet Improvement)

2019-04-07 Thread PARTH PATIL
I have done some MAJOR changes/improvements to my proposal please have a look. I have added technical description and addressed more issues related to the forrmsets. Suggest any changes if needed. On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 10:38:42 PM UTC+5:30, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > > I will try to come

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

2019-04-07 Thread PARTH PATIL
I came across this ticket while going over the feature list of Forms and Formsets (# 18830 ) Feature requested in this thicket is something like *FormWizard:* * It will be like a container which can have forms, formsets, and formwizards itself.*

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

2019-04-07 Thread PARTH PATIL
(Sorry I typed the incomplete message in the last post) I came across this ticket while going over the feature list of Forms and Formsets (# 18830 ) Feature requested in this thicket is something like *FormWizard:* * It will be like a container w

Re: Help for GSoC proposal (Formset improvements)

2019-04-07 Thread Carlton Gibson
Hi Parth. Well, the wizard (&co) got moved out to it's own app https://django-formtools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ But yes, there's no reason why this sort of thing wouldn't potentially in scope. Kind Regards, Carlton On Sunday, 7 April 2019 23:47:23 UTC+2, PARTH PATIL wrote: > > (Sorry I t