Re: Proposal on Custom Indexes - Google Summer of Code

2016-03-25 Thread akki
Hi I have submitted my proposal on GSoC's website. You can find it at https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/serve/5167032660131840/. It would get locked (from any further editing) at 25 March 19:00 UTC (which is almost 11 hours from now). -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Revisiting lazy middleware initialization

2016-03-25 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 24 Mar 2016, at 17:39, David Evans wrote: > > Currently, middleware is initialized lazily on serving the first request, > rather than on application start. There may well have been good reasons for > this historically, but I don't think they apply any longer. Indeed, since 1.7 and the app-l

Re: Revisiting lazy middleware initialization

2016-03-25 Thread Florian Apolloner
+1 -- Patches welcome :D On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:02:26 AM UTC+1, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2016, at 17:39, David Evans > > wrote: > > > Currently, middleware is initialized lazily on serving the first request, > rather than on application start. There may well have been good

Re: Revisiting lazy middleware initialization

2016-03-25 Thread David Evans
Great! Well the two line patch I suggested to `get_wsgi_application` solves the problem. But it still leaves the lazy loading mechanism in the code base. Getting rid of it would obviously be preferable, but is more complex. I'll work on producing a patch for that though. Dave On 25 Mar 2016 10:08

Re: relative path in {% extends "...base.html" %} like relative import

2016-03-25 Thread Vitaly Bogomolov
> > > Assuming the feature is accepted, at least a ticket and documentation are > needed to finish the patch. See the patch review checklist: > > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/writing-code/submitting-patches/#patch-review-checklist > Documentation:https://github.co

Re: [GSoC 2016] Please Critique (Condition API - Related to Auth)

2016-03-25 Thread Connor Boyle
This is excellent! Thank you for your comments, they are very helpful and thorough–far from amateur. I'll address some of them in no particular order, starting with: >The 'access' conditions must be passed or else any action will be rejected and no acknowledgement will be made that it had to do

Re: [GSoC 2016] Please Critique (Condition API - Related to Auth)

2016-03-25 Thread Connor Boyle
> On your last point: This may be a very bad idea from the beginning, but I'd hope to experiment with making a wrapper object for form.cleaned_data whose (the wrapper object's) .__getattribute__() returns the value for that key in form.cleaned_data. For example: calling wrapper.name would get t