On 29 huhti, 00:09, ptone wrote:
> A couple just quick observations.
>
> defer and only are tasks/concepts used when doing a query based on
> knowledge of your dataset - adding them to the model itself expands the
> number of places where this concept is considered. This has some good and
> some b
Dear knowledgeable persons:
I have completed a beta-test version of a Linux remote access server for
adodbapi, and have started the process if integrating them into
django-mssql. (This is going to be an interesting experience for me -- I
have already identified two or three new features that
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Christopher Medrela
>
wrote:
>
> Jacob, as you said, I deleted django-updates part, but I ended with a
>
> proposal taking only 9 weeks. Did you mean also scheduling more than 6
> weeks
>
> for the first part of the proposal (writing the new framework) an
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, VernonCole wrote:
> Dear knowledgeable persons:
>
> I have completed a beta-test version of a Linux remote access server for
> adodbapi, and have started the process if integrating them into
> django-mssql. (This is going to be an interesting experience for me -- I
> ha
Hi folks -
Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
Django 1.6 release timeline:
Alpha: May 16
Beta: June 20
RC: Aug 1
Final: as early as Aug 8, or later if more RCs are needed.
Remember that Alpha is the deadline for "big" features, so if you've
got something sizable
On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>
> Alpha: May 16
> Beta: June 20
> RC: Aug 1
> Final: as early as Aug 8, or later if more RCs are needed.
Sounds reasonabl
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>
> Alpha: May 16
> Beta: June 20
> RC: Aug 1
> Final: as early as Aug 8, or later if more RCs are needed.
>
I see one issue wit
On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this timeline
> is followed, support for 1.4 will be dropped less than 6 months after the
> release of 1.5. At least for some of us (which, as I mentioned earlier on the
> list, only mo
On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
>> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this timeline
>> is followed, support for 1.4 will be dropped less than 6 months after the
>> release of 1.5. At least for some of
On 1 May 2013, at 00:13, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
>
>> On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
>>> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this
>>> timeline
>>> is followed, support for 1.4 will be dropped less t
On 04/30/2013 05:27 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
> Absolutely, there's no requirement to migrate, but it does have the
> feel of an weird kind of deprecation. Obviously there are
> workarounds, like you said, I can upgrade to 1.5 without changing
> user models (though that does involve incurring a bit
Hi Shai,
On 04/30/2013 04:38 PM, Shai Berger wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> Hi folks -
>>
>> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
>> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>>
>> Alpha: May 16
>> Beta: June 20
>> RC: Aug 1
>> Final: as early as
On 1 May 2013, at 00:35, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 05:27 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
>> Absolutely, there's no requirement to migrate, but it does have the
>> feel of an weird kind of deprecation. Obviously there are
>> workarounds, like you said, I can upgrade to 1.5 without changing
>> us
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:45 PM, VernonCole wrote:
> Dear knowledgeable persons:
>
> I have completed a beta-test version of a Linux remote access server for
> adodbapi, and have started the process if integrating them into
> django-mssql. (This is going to be an interesting experience for me -
14 matches
Mail list logo
