I am using the development version of rsync with --info-progress option. I
am writing a django front-end app which transfer files from server to local
computer using rsync. This is the code I am using:
finalresult = subprocess.Popen(['sshpass', '-p', password, 'rsync', '-avz',
'--info=progress2'
Please ask questions about using Django on django-users. The topic of this
list is the development of Django itself.
Thanks.
2012/11/29 Sachit Adhikari
> I am using the development version of rsync with --info-progress option. I
> am writing a django front-end app which transfer files from ser
I've set up the test_project of one of my apps -
http://jpic.pythonanywhere.com/ (user/pass: test/test) it went pretty well.
Great work !
One question thought, most of the time, free accounts disappear at some
point, when the company grows. Are you committed to maintaining free
accounts ?
Thanks
Hey,
We're definitely committed to the freemium model, so there should always be
a free plan + free web hosting. What we might do is tweak the bandwidth
and cpu usage restrictions to encourage heavy users to start paying, but
people running a small webapp shouldn't have anything to worry about
Hi Anssi,
When I thought about it, the most prominent usecase seemed to me of getting
one of a set of many and expecting just one result. In that case,
get_or_none would suffice. However, as a method name, I prefer first() for
being concise.
For me it is ok to just have the first() method wit
So here we are 4 years later, version 1.5 is about to be released and we
still don't have a solution for composite primary keys in the code base? Or
am I missing it in the docs somewhere?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
No, there is no such solution in the codebase. Are you aware of a patch we
should be reviewing on this issue?
Alex
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Ron Smith wrote:
> So here we are 4 years later, version 1.5 is about to be released and we
> still don't have a solution for composite primary ke
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Ron Smith wrote:
> So here we are 4 years later, version 1.5 is about to be released and we
> still don't have a solution for composite primary keys in the code base? Or
> am I missing it in the docs somewhere?
I'm not sure if you meant to, but your tone here come
Hi Harry,
That particular page has been locked down due to problems we've had with
spam. If you let us know what you want to add, I can add an entry to the
list on your behalf.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Harry Percival
wrote:
> It's for promotional purposes really -
I'm sorry, I did not indent for it to be hostile or rude but, after reading
it I guess it could sound that way. I was more frustrated because I was
sure I was missing something somewhere.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Ron Smith wrote
I thought there were several patches or workarounds proposed in the thread
that I commented on. I did not mean to kick a hornets nest. I'll just back
away quietly now and see if I can switch everything over to SQLAlchemy like
one of the other comments suggested.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Al
11 matches
Mail list logo
