Re: ModelForm enforces its version of save_m2m

2012-06-06 Thread is_null
Thanks for answering. It's "funny code" but it works indeed. Thanks again -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/2_4X_NFZmP8J. To post t

Re: Draft branch: Swappable User models in contrib.auth

2012-06-06 Thread Andrew Ingram
On 4 June 2012 16:12, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >  * The swapping mechanic is set up using a new Meta option on models > called 'swappable' that defines the setting where an alternate model > can be defined. Technically, the swappable option *could* be used for > any model; however, I'm not propo

class based views and decorators: the usual pet peeves

2012-06-06 Thread mephisto
Hi all, As a web developer primarily using django, i've been pleasantly surprised by the obvious advantages of using class based views, whenever they are applicable. So far they don't always seem to offer the most elegant solution for a specific problem, but obviously i simply use view functions i

Re: Draft branch: Swappable User models in contrib.auth

2012-06-06 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On Jun 6, 9:20 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > wrote: > > Understood & agreed (the "this model is dynamic made explicit" part > > seems really important specifically). > > > I am afraid of the hard-coding of meta.swappable must be 'SOME_VAR' > > which then references settings.SOME_VAR, and that

Re: Glad site is being brought back.

2012-06-06 Thread Bruno Renié
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Sokolowski wrote: > Please disregard this message, it was meant as a reply to a thread not a new > thread. > > -Original Message- From: Daniel Sokolowski > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:35 PM > To: Django developers > Subject: Glad site is being

Re: Glad site is being brought back.

2012-06-06 Thread Daniel Sokolowski
Super legendary, thank you for your efforts. -Original Message- From: Bruno Renié Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:47 AM To: django-developers@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Glad site is being brought back. On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Sokolowski wrote: Please disregard th

Re: Django git guidelines

2012-06-06 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
I have update the working with git guidelines based on the above discussions. Here is the stats of the whole of the work: docs/internals/contributing/committing-code.txt| 108 - .../contributing/writing-code/branch-policy.txt| 171 - docs/internals/contributing/writin