Hi Russ --
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
> #12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
Good stuff.
A couple of things though:
* I'm really not a fan of "bake()" and ".baked" -- it rea
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Tim Diggins wrote:
> wondering why ImageField doesn't rely on width_field and height_field
> (if present and populated) for the dimensions? (i.e. from ImageField's
> perspective these seem to be "write-only" fields).
>
> This seems pretty unperformant (moving to ri
Heh, already put a few hours doing something like this. There's some
django-discus attempts out there--have you looked at them? I haven't
bothered to notice if any use the comments framework but it sure would
be handy to make comments out of discus or backtype feeds or variants
thereof.
But whethe
*very nice* Russ. Congrats and thanks! Totally removes a wart I've
just got used to working around.
"bake" is a pretty universal verb for this, afaict. I wouldn't say it
was clever or new. "fry" however (in Jacob's post) was new to me and
required googling.
Ian.
--
You received this message bec
On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote:
> The point is that I'm *not* assuming hardware of equivalent speed.
> I'm assuming that a worst-case attacker has hardware significantly
> faster than your webserver at their disposal, so I was curious if the
> purported benefit still held in that
Hi,
I've come across some interesting behaviour if you intentionally supply bad
data to a model formset whose forms use CheckboxInputs. Basically, it's
possible to have custom validation code on the form class which ensures the
boolean field's input is False, have this validation pass, but then
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>> I'm not arguing that a salt helps against brute-forcing a *single*
>> password (it doesn't), but it does in fact help against someone trying
>> to brute-force your entire password database (or any subset of more
>> than one password), s
The existing apps use the JavaScript interface offered by Disqus. This
does not integrate with apps that expect Django's comments app.
I've made good progress on my comments app extension that uses Disqus,
but now I am at a point where the models are working against me. Code
is on bitbucket: http:
On Nov 28, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Tom X. Tobin wrote:
> No, I'm not thinking of rainbow tables. The key word here is
> *single*. As I said before, a salt *does* help against an attacker
> trying to brute-force multiple passwords from your database, since he
> can't simply test each brute-force resul
On 11/28/2010 10:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
#12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
Thank you!
- The render() shortcut doesn't use TemplateResponse. Since render()
and TemplateReponse() have exactly th
Hi,
I'm updating the patch for #12180 to work with the dev version of 1.3, and
preparing a test case for it. Being new to the Django test suite, it's not
clear to me how to introduce a backend-specific and settings-file-specific test
(the test case requires PostgreSQL 8.2+ and AUTOCOMMIT: True
Whoops, url should be https://bitbucket.org/bolhoed/django_disqus_comments.
On Nov 28, 7:29 pm, Kevin Renskers wrote:
> The existing apps use the JavaScript interface offered by Disqus. This
> does not integrate with apps that expect Django's comments app.
>
> I've made good progress on my commen
Hi,
I am the student who worked on improving the comments framework a
couple of years back and have been absconding since then ;-)
Personally, I would love to see the comments app out of contrib
because of the need to maintain backwards compatibility especially for
an app with very few users.
On N
Hi,
On Sunday 28 November 2010, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> I'm updating the patch for #12180 to work with the dev version of 1.3, and
> preparing a test case for it. Being new to the Django test suite, it's
> not clear to me how to introduce a backend-specific and
> settings-file-specific test
14 matches
Mail list logo
