On 27.10.2010, at 09:46, SmileyChris wrote:
> On Oct 27, 5:35 am, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>> I would like to bring this up again, because this is something that
>> would really improve readability of my templates. I'm mainly
>> interested in ticket #7817 (the include tag changes), but extending
>>
On 31.10.2010, at 23:06, Ryan wrote:
> I track trunk while developing new projects, and I just picked up the
> new contrib.staticfiles app. I was disappointed how repetitive and
> redundant the configuration is. I already have MEDIA_ROOT and
> MEDIA_URL defined, so now I have to add
>
> STATICF
On 02.11.2010, at 03:55, Carl Karsten wrote:
> I am not completely sure what is going on, but pretty sure the new
> staticfiles thing is colliding with my existing
>
> urlpatterns += patterns('',
> (r'^static/(?P.*)$', 'django.contrib.staticfiles.views.serve',
>{'document_root': 'static/'
Hi Jannis,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 27.10.2010, at 09:46, SmileyChris wrote:
>
>> On Oct 27, 5:35 am, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>>> I would like to bring this up again, because this is something that
>>> would really improve readability of my templates. I'm mainly
>>
I've been using CookieStorage (for less DB usage). Us that frowned
upon nowadays, in favor of the DB backend?
On Nov 2, 6:26 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David P. Novakovic
>
> wrote:
> > This is certainly an artifact of the fact that messages recent started
>
BTW, my program doesn't have any issues with gangrene. I meant "a slew
of 35 errors" in my original post. Sometimes I look back at what I've
typed and it amazes me.
On Nov 2, 6:26 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David P. Novakovic
>
> wrote:
> > This is certainly
In the related_name docs (
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name
) you read about how you must specify a related_name for any foreign
key in an abstract base class. This doesn't seem to be true in
practice (I'm using trunk from a week ago,
On 03.11.2010, at 12:01, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Jannis,
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>> On 27.10.2010, at 09:46, SmileyChris wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 27, 5:35 am, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
I would like to bring this up again, because this is something that
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> I've been using CookieStorage (for less DB usage). Us that frowned
> upon nowadays, in favor of the DB backend?
There is no "db" backend for messages, there is only a "legacy"
backend, which, as the name suggests, is for legacy applications --
app
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> In the related_name docs (
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name
> ) you read about how you must specify a related_name for any foreign
> key in an abstract base class. This doesn't seem
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 03.11.2010, at 12:01, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Jannis,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>>> On 27.10.2010, at 09:46, SmileyChris wrote:
>>>
On Oct 27, 5:35 am, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
> I would lik
On 3 November 2010 10:03, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 27.10.2010, at 09:46, SmileyChris wrote:
>
>> On Oct 27, 5:35 am, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>>> I would like to bring this up again, because this is something that
>>> would really improve readability of my templates. I'm mainly
>>> interested in ti
Hi Tom,
On Nov 2, 12:58 pm, "Tom X. Tobin" wrote:
> Do the Git-using core developers have a preference for merge vs.
> rebase for updating an upstream-tracking branch? I prefer to rebase
> to keep the changes in question at the branch HEAD, especially if the
> branch hasn't been pushed publicly
As far as I know, the only thing still missing from the ticket is a
decision as to whether there need to be documentation changes for
simple tags and inclusion tags... if there need to be changes, I could
try working on them. I would just need to know.
Best,
Stephen
--
You received this message b
Has supporting kwargs along with args been mentioned? I would find
having both very helpful. Maybe we can lean on the work happening for
the include and with tags.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Burrows
wrote:
> As far as I know, the only thing still missing from the ticket is a
> deci
Ok, thanks. I'm using CookieStorage for messages, so the issue may not
reside only with legacy storage. Should I create a ticket for this?
On Nov 3, 6:11 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> > I've been using CookieStorage (for less DB usage). Us th
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> Ok, thanks. I'm using CookieStorage for messages, so the issue may not
> reside only with legacy storage. Should I create a ticket for this?
If you'd be so kind.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
On Nov 3, 4:12 am, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>
> No, MEDIA_* and STATICFILES_* settings aren't the same, the former is for
> user generated content (like file uploads), the latter for general static
> files your site needs to work (such as css/js files). The distinction is also
> well described in t
Hi All! Sorry for late response.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
> ... which is something you can already do with a callable column::
>
> class MyModelAdmin(ModelAdmin):
> def formatted_foobar(self, obj):
> return slugify(truncateword
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Alex Kamedov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Honestly, I can't see the benefit in what you're proposing here.
>> Before you spend a whole lot more time updating the patch to try and
>> make and keep it trunk ready, you nee
I've tried communicate with Brian via email before start discussion here. I
take the email address from his github account. In email I ask he about his
plans on this ticket, but don't get reply.
Originally I need to add some customization to admin change list requested
by my clients. It's possible
21 matches
Mail list logo
