Re: 'week_day' starting with sunday as first day of a week need to be fixed

2009-03-07 Thread Tai Lee
In my bike shed (and cron's), Sunday is 0 AND 7, which seems nice. Then your week can starting with Sunday as 0-6 or Monday as 1-7. Oh, I see that Bob Thomas already suggested this. Isn't it a moot point, though? Isn't it considered a backwards incompatible change even if made before 1.1? Or is

Re: 'week_day' starting with sunday as first day of a week need to be fixed

2009-03-07 Thread Shai Berger
On Friday 06 March 2009, Ivan Sagalaev wrote: > > I was always under an impression that Sunday is considered first day of > week only in US. Now Wikipedia (though not the English version) says > it's also the case for Canada and Israel. But it's still a minority. In Israel, as well as most Arab c

Re: 'week_day' starting with sunday as first day of a week need to be fixed

2009-03-07 Thread Adones Cunha
Although in Brazil Sunday is not considered a business day, it's considered the first day of the week. I believe the same occurrs in most Latin America. I cannot see where a such decision can influence much in a development environment. Most programming languanges/frameworks/APIs/whatever consider

Work on #9964

2009-03-07 Thread Shai Berger
Hi list, Malcolm, If I start working on a patch for #9664 (Transaction middleware closes the transaction only when it's marked as dirty; marked for milestone 1.1), will I be duplicating effort? The solution I would propose is, essentially, a removal of the clean/dirty concept from transaction

Re: Work on #9964

2009-03-07 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 21:24 +0200, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi list, Malcolm, > > If I start working on a patch for #9664 (Transaction middleware closes the > transaction only when it's marked as dirty; marked for milestone 1.1), will I > be duplicating effort? > > The solution I would propose is,

[PATCH] Trivial typo in testing documentation

2009-03-07 Thread Matt Doran
Hi all, Attached is a trivial patch for a typo in the testing documentation. Regards, Matt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-devel

Re: [PATCH] Trivial typo in testing documentation

2009-03-07 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:19 +1100, Matt Doran wrote: > Hi all, > > Attached is a trivial patch for a typo in the testing documentation. Thanks for this. Best place to file patches is in the ticket tracking system so that they don't get forgotten. http://code.djangoproject.com/simpleticket (Cre

Re: [PATCH] Trivial typo in testing documentation

2009-03-07 Thread Matt Doran
Thanks Malcom. Will do. I saw the patch contribution guidelines, but wasn't sure if a ticket was required for such a trivial patch. Matt On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:19 +1100, Matt Doran wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Attached is a trivial

Re: [PATCH] Trivial typo in testing documentation

2009-03-07 Thread Matt Doran
Done. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10433 On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matt Doran wrote: > Thanks Malcom. > > Will do. I saw the patch contribution guidelines, but wasn't sure if a > ticket was required for such a trivial patch. > > Matt > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Malcolm

Re: [PATCH] Trivial typo in testing documentation

2009-03-07 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 15:20 +1100, Matt Doran wrote: > Thanks Malcom. > > Will do. I saw the patch contribution guidelines, but wasn't sure if > a ticket was required for such a trivial patch. Definitely. The reason isn't because we're complete bastards and like making people do work. It's beca

Re: 'week_day' starting with sunday as first day of a week need to be fixed

2009-03-07 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Tai Lee wrote: > > In my bike shed (and cron's), Sunday is 0 AND 7, which seems nice. > Then your week can starting with Sunday as 0-6  or Monday as 1-7. > > Oh, I see that Bob Thomas already suggested this. Isn't it a moot > point, though? Isn't it considered a ba