Re: django-values -> django-policy?

On Wed, May 30, Nicola Larosa wrote: > > > Jacob Kaplan-Moss (bikeshed BDFL) wrote: > >> I'm going to make a dictatorial call to paint the bikeshed MY color. > > Jason Davies wrote: > > +1. > > What part of "dictatorial" is not clear? ;-) Publically cheering to dictatorial decisions is a good

Re: django-values -> django-policy?

On 5/31/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Publically cheering to dictatorial decisions is a good tradition all over > the world ;-) When do I get to rename months after my family? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saparmurat_Niyazov#New_Names_for_Months_and_Days] Jacob --~--~---

Re: django-values -> django-policy?

> Michael Radziej wrote: >> Publically cheering to dictatorial decisions is a good tradition all over >> the world ;-) Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > When do I get to rename months after my family? > > [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saparmurat_Niyazov#New_Names_for_Months_and_Days] Don't know about

Re: Optgroups from nested choices in newforms (discussion of patch on #4412)

Has anything changed since Adrian ruled optgroups as unwanted? see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3262 and http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/b27f19d932c84316/37a4fa049dc63733?lnk=gst&q=optgroup On 5/31/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Optgroups from nested choices in newforms (discussion of patch on #4412)

On 5/31/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Cleaning up some flagged items I've been meaning to respond to...) > > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 03:56 -0500, James Bennett wrote: > > I noticed a patch sitting on #4412 tonight which seems interesting but > > definitely needs a decision;

Checking group permissions in template code

After reading the docs and looking for posts relating this problem here and in .users, I found no "standard" way of checking for a user's group permissions in the templates. So what I did is to add the following method to auth.models.User (yeah, yeah, it *should* be in appname.models.UserProfile)

Re: Optgroups from nested choices in newforms (discussion of patch on #4412)

On 5/31/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anything changed since Adrian ruled optgroups as unwanted? > > see > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3262 > and Well, his comment there indicates that the lack of need would not justify an additional widget. As James mentions, #4412 does

Re: django-values -> django-policy?

On Thu, May 31, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On 5/31/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Publically cheering to dictatorial decisions is a good tradition all over > > the world ;-) > > When do I get to rename months after my family? Ah, no problem at all in case your family members

Attn: creator of AjaxWidgetComboBox

you have mail. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL

Many-to-many relationships with additional columns

I've been giving a bit of thought into many-to-many relationships lately, and I (once again) ran across the task of creating a relationship that contained additional information. I know this has been bounced around before, but I can't seem to find any substantial discussions on the topic, so I wro

Re: Many-to-many relationships with additional columns

On 5/31/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ManyToManyManager +1. No, wait, + a whole lot more than that! I've been wanting explicit M2M join objects for quite some time; this is a pretty neat way to accomplish it. Just for shits and giggles, her

Re: Checking group permissions in template code

On 5/31/07, vida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After reading the docs and looking for posts relating this problem > here and in .users, I found no "standard" way of checking for a > user's group permissions in the templates. Double posting to two groups like this is _really_ bad form. On top of

Re: Many-to-many relationships with additional columns

Yeah! This is much cleaner. I need to add ordering to some model relations (i.e. represent all related values as an ordered list, where relations can be shifted up & down) to the M2M field, it looks like it would fit much easier using a manager & concrete Model subclass than being restricted to a

Re: Checking group permissions in template code

On May 31, 6:18 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/31/07, vida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > After reading the docs and looking for posts relating this problem > > here and in .users, I found no "standard" way of checking for a > > user's group permissions in the

<<< FLASH GAME MAKER DOWNLOAD >>>

Flash Game Maker Download http://flash-game-maker.50webs.com/ flash game maker download Here For more help about Flash please reply me RANIA --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

<<< Uk Universities List for Students >>>

Hello Friends, *Here are Top 10 UK Universities admission open in some universities and some universities give you visa assistance. http://students.awepedia.info /top-10-uk-universities/ i

Re: Checking group permissions in template code

On 6/1/07, vida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 31, 6:18 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you're asking a "How do I do this" questions, django-users is the > > place to do it. > > I meant to CC this group when I posted to users. > > It's both a *how do I do this?*, and a

((==Unbelievable Mega machines==))

*Friends Here are New 7 Wonders (Unbelievable Mega machine)* http://information.100stuff.com/unbelievable-megamachine/ if you know about any unbelievable thing please us Thanks bye --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Many-to-many relationships with additional columns

On 6/1/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My main reason for bringing it here, however, is to ask if there are > indeed some previous discussions that I should consider before I go to > far in my experiments on this subject. Or if I'm just completely off > my rocker. You may well be