On 8/29/06, Andrew Durdin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a project I am working on, we need to store monetary values in the
> database, and we want to avoid floats altogether so that we don't lose
> precision or have representation errors. The existing FloatField was
> not suitable for use, becau
As I saw Adrian said this problem should be discussed in the maillist,
so I post here.
And what I want indeed is not invoke "authenticate()", but only invoke
"login()" is enough after I create a new user using create_user(). I
thought since I create a new user successfully, it's implied that the
Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I've also tried Jason's nose-django plugin, and it uses
> management.install(app) to create the test database. This doesn't fire
> a signal I can hook, so I wasn't able to create my initial data.
Now that syncdb can be run non-interactively, I can switch the plugin
over
On 9/5/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think the later is more comfortable. But there is no automaticly
> authenticate in create_user, so for now, I must write like the former.
As I said in the ticket (that was me, btw, not Adrian), I think your
second method of just calling 'login'
On 8/23/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How To Be Sexy, Rule 1: The word "manipulator" has really got to go.
>
Thinger = "Manipulator" or "Form" # The thing that holds the fields
Bah, I try and try, but I can't figure out how to seperate the
manipulation process from the Thing
On 9/5/06, JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that syncdb can be run non-interactively, I can switch the pluginover to calling that instead. It will take some time, however, becauseI need to figure out how to do that and use the new create/drop test db
functions from djagnoo.test.utils when they are
On 9/5/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/5/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think the later is more comfortable. But there is no automaticly
> > authenticate in create_user, so for now, I must write like the former.
>
> As I said in the ticket (that was me, btw,
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 9/5/06, JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Now that syncdb can be run non-interactively, I can switch the plugin
> > over to calling that instead. It will take some time, however, because
> > I need to figure out how to do that and use the new create/drop tes
