Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Improve representation of IntSet. (PR #99)

2023-02-14 Thread multiverstack
@tqchen Thanks for you recommendation. Agree with the efficiency risk and it's now updated. Could you take another look? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/99#issuecomment-1429299079 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to t

[apache/tvm] [RFC][Tracking Issue] Introduce PresburgerSet (Issue #14006)

2023-02-15 Thread multiverstack
### This issue is to track progress for RFC#99: [Introduce PresburgerSet](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/99) - [ ] P1. Build & CI setup, PresburgerSet class with minimal member functions. - [ ] P2. Basic set manipulation functions. - [ ] P3. Dependency analysis utilities. - [ ] P4. Helper

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Introduce PresburgerSet (PR #99)

2023-02-21 Thread multiverstack
> > I very much like the proposed improvements, especially the use cases for > inner-block and inter-block analysis. While I have made some development [for > similar > applications](https://github.com/apache/tvm/blob/main/src/tir/analysis/control_flow_graph.h), > the additional formalism a