Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem

2005-11-07 Thread Shankar Unni
Bob Bronson wrote: Who cares? I'm through w/TC. Good riddence. Thank goodness. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HPUX Itanium Native Connector Build Error

2005-11-09 Thread Shankar Unni
Fenlason, Josh wrote: I didn't see anything about it being necessary to build OpenSSL as a shared library. No, but even a static OpenSSL library that you want to link into your module must be build using the PIC (position-independent code) option, just as if you were going to make a DLL out o

Re: svn commit: r332351 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/bin/catalina.bat webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2005-11-11 Thread Shankar Unni
Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: yoavs Date: Thu Nov 10 10:44:53 2005 New Revision: 332351 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332351&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 37319: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37319 Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/s

Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-14 Thread Shankar Unni
Tim Funk wrote: 2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via multiple proxies) Plus, other load balancers seem to stick in other headers, too (e.g. "X-Real-IP"). (These two seem to be the most popular). It'll be an interesting job to figure out the "real" IP address i

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42353] - org.apache.jk.core.MsgContext Error sending end packet

2007-05-15 Thread Shankar Unni
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-14 16:31 --- There are other explanations but Bugzilla is not a support forum to provide these explanations. Please sue the users list. Isn't that rather a heavy-handed course of action? :-) ---

Re: URLStreamHandler and ContentHandler

2006-05-24 Thread Shankar Unni
Yoav Shapira wrote: More on topic, I don't mind switching Tomcat to java.util.logging Umm, please don't do that. For those of us who *have* mastered the art of using log4j with Tomcat (:-)), this would be a giant step back (having one logging mechanism for Tomcat and one for the webapps - an

Re: URLStreamHandler and ContentHandler

2006-05-26 Thread Shankar Unni
Wade Chandler wrote: You will still be able to use your log4j while Tomcat uses a different internal logging package. No, that's not what I meant. I meant that now, to configure our Tomcat + our webapps, I need to do two distinct configuration mechanisms: one to configure Catalina logs, an

Re: Conflicts and JDT

2006-06-09 Thread Shankar Unni
Yoav Shapira wrote: There's also another reason: if we use JDT then we don't require users to have the complete JDK, only a JRE. This is a big deal (perhaps even more important than the technical / performance benefits) from a licensing perspective, especially for people who repackage / redistr