Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/
According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
I see consist
Mark Thomas wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/
According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] St
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 15 02:07:34 2008
New Revision: 676839
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676839&view=rev
Log:
Withdraw patch pending further investigation. Root cause appears to be my build
environment rather than a bug.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tom
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 15 02:14:21 2008
New Revision: 676843
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676843&view=rev
Log:
Revert changes as root cause of issue appears to be strangeness in my build
environment.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/security/SecurityClassLoad.jav
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 10:06 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> There is something screwy with my TC6 build environment. On a different
> machine I can't reproduce this. I suspect my related patch is bad too. I'll
> do some more testing tonight with my main environment.
>
> In the meantime, I withdraw m
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 15 08:51:44 2008
New Revision: 676944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676944&view=rev
Log:
As Remy pointed out, this really should be in the finally block.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/CGIServlet.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/o
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 15 08:56:49 2008
New Revision: 676945
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676945&view=rev
Log:
Respond to Remy's comment.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/
On Jul 14, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/
According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X]
Author: remm
Date: Tue Jul 15 09:07:53 2008
New Revision: 676949
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676949&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=6769
Can someone in the know comment on this? Is it intended behavior for tomcat
to follow symlinks when deleting the exploded directory during undeploy? Or
should I file a bug and attached this patch to it?
Michael Bailey
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Michael Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> P
Michael:
It sounds like a good change. I have not tried the patch (BTW: I
believe that FarmWarDeployer is now considered
unsupported/deprecated), but the theory here sounds right. I think it
makes sense to consolidate the implementations of the code that
removes the files, if they are basically
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
Summary: Tomcat does not reload application
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.16
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
--- Comment #1 from kawasima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-15 19:25:17 PST ---
When allowlinging attribute is false, application can load class in jar file.
But, when the actual file of the symbolic link file changed,
tomcat does not rel
13 matches
Mail list logo
