Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.0.0

The blockers are once again resolved. Building RC1 has failed 4 times in a row due to flaky tests. Also, the last 4 runs of "Solr-Check-9.0" in Jenkins have failed: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.0/ These are the tests failing in recent Jenkins runs: - org.apache.solr.se

[VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.0.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC1-rev-4ea6ecc35c0f6585c76e0713acfe917ccfe3b8cf You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

I don't think anyone should attempt to vet this RC1 from that non official docker image (cominvent). If we want users to test the docker image, let us host it on docker-solr's hub (or provide steps for user to build for themselves and try). On Tue, 29 Mar, 2022, 11:48 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote: > Pl

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

We should definitely provide ways to build the image yourself, and in the future use apache/solr-nightly for release candidates. But for the first release I don't think it requires another RC. Here is the way to build the docker image yourself: docker build https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Sorry Jan, I must -1 the candidate. The official dockerfile is still using the download locations from lucene, not the Solr TLP. > # These should never be overridden except for the purposes of testing the > Dockerfile before release > ARG > SOLR_CLOSER_URL="http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua?

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Thanks for pointing this out Ishan. We do not ever vote over a Docker image, it is not an official artifact. The vote is only for the signed tgz artifacts. The Docker image is linked as a convenience binary built with Dockerfile.official

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Agree, the official Dockerfile is now part of the VOTE, so this is a valid veto. Well spotted Houston, since it makes no sense to try to use the Dockerfile without build-arg at this stage. > 29. mar. 2022 kl. 22:27 skrev Houston Putman : > > Sorry Jan, I must -1 the candidate. > > The official

[FAILED] [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

The vote was vetoed due to bug in Dockerfile. This vote has FAILED > 29. mar. 2022 kl. 22:31 skrev Jan Høydahl : > > Agree, the official Dockerfile is now part of the VOTE, so this is a valid > veto. > Well spotted Houston, since it makes no sense to try to use the Dockerfile > without build-a

Re: [FAILED] [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Not sure if other folks ran into security manager issues, but I had a bunch of failing tests Here's some highlights from the failed run: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.JettyWebappTest > testAdminUI FAILED *Security manager issues:* org.apache.solr.hdfs.handler.TestHdfsBackupRestoreCore =>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

-1: Java 11 Only - SUCCESS! [0:35:46.949352] Java 11 + 17 via python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py --test-java17 /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-17.jdk/Contents/Home https://dist.apache.org/... run tests w/ Java 17 and testArgs='-Dtests.nightly=false -Dtests.badapples=false '..

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Never mind, I think that last one is because I ran from a src unpack and not a bin unpack like I thought I was running. Probably could have a better error message instead of that CNFE. On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:41 PM Mike Drob wrote: > -1: > > Java 11 Only - SUCCESS! [0:35:46.949352] > > Java 11

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Can you elaborate on your setup? I cannot reproduce locally... Jan > 29. mar. 2022 kl. 22:41 skrev Mike Drob : > > -1: > > Java 11 Only - SUCCESS! [0:35:46.949352] > > Java 11 + 17 via python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > --test-java17 /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-17.jd

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

SUCCESS! [1:24:30.108261] No need to vote on this one, but a success nonetheless. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 4:44 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Never mind, I think that last one is because I ran from a src unpack and > not a bin unpack like I thought I was ru

Re: Release notes draft for Apache Solr 9.0

Some nice improvements in the temporal graph queries: https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/graph.adoc#temporal-graph-expressions Particularly useful for people building event correlation and SIEM products. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot

[REVIEW-REQUEST] Solr 9.0 Reference Guide DRAFT

Hi, The Solr 9.0 RefGuide is heavily re-organized since 8.x, and it contains lots of new content for the new 9.x features. Please review and give feedback on the current draft (nightly) guide located at https://nightlies.apache.org/solr/draft-guides/solr-reference-guide-nightly/solr/9_0/index.h

Re: [FAILED] [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Looks like some files in your git checkout softlink to maven .m2 folder? That is surprising. Try to reproduce on a clean git clone, and file an issue if you believe there is a bug somewhere. Jan > 29. mar. 2022 kl. 22:37 skrev Anshum Gupta : > > Not sure if other folks ran into security manag

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

Found the bug. testSolrExample() will do a chdir() command, so the script is in a binary-dist folder without gradlew command. Will commit a fix. Jan > 29. mar. 2022 kl. 22:41 skrev Mike Drob : > > sh: ./gradlew: No such file or directory >

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.0.0 RC1

PR for making Smoketester work with JDK11 + JDK17: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/775 I'll likely spin RC2 tomorrow. Feel free to commit improvements to tests and other bug fixes until then. If you discover new blockers, please raise a new blocker

subscribe