I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
Also, can we get information on what happened with the conference call
regarding the (IMO bad) idea on conditional testing? I sure hope we're not
using it.
Gary
On Tue, May
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
> scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
>From my part I didn't advance much, since we are working hard on
reviewing and improving the documentation.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 7:37 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
> > scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
>
> From my part I didn't advance much,
On 2024/06/14 20:37:44 "Piotr P. Karwasz" wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 18:12, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I sure hope that all tests are ALWAYS run by default in the 2.x branch,
> > otherwise it will be a -1 from me.
>
> Currently Predictive Test Selection is enabled on all CI bui
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 14:15, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> I am -1 on changing our PRODUCTION 2.x build. If you want to experiment with
> some company's product, please do so in a non-production branch. The cynic in
> me sees this as a company wanting free advertising to say Apache uses th
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'll give you all my -1 POV here:
I share some of your concerns.
My main motivation for this experiment with Develocity is not to save
up CI time, but to improve its responsiveness.
>From my contributions to other projects I learned t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:50 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I'll give you all my -1 POV here:
>
> I share some of your concerns.
> My main motivation for this experiment with Develocity is not to save
> up CI time, but to improve
I have been working on creating log4j-context-data. My plan was to remove stuff
from Log4j API after I have something workable. Even though 2.24.0 won’t
include log4j-context-data I want to make sure that what we are leaving will be
compatible.
Ralph
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Gary Gregor
I agree that compatibility is paramount for 2.x 😀
Gary
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024, 12:22 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> I have been working on creating log4j-context-data. My plan was to remove
> stuff from Log4j API after I have something workable. Even though 2.24.0
> won’t include log4j-context-data I wa
