Hi Matt,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 22:15, Matt Sicker wrote:
> While I think we can adapt the Airflow guidance to Log4j, we will likely have
> some different requirements. I think this would help a lot in determining
> when and for how long to support plugins that involve third party
> dependenci
+1
Sounds like a good thing.
Being in the top 8% of most critical open source projects requires us to
consider everything very carefully
I also see that we need to adopt the Airflow requirements to us a bit, but they
are indeed a very good start
--
The Apache Software Foundation
V.P., Data Pri
