This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.7.0.
Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
Commit: 04d9a79fb5cadb791c9e66fc671d6c0ffedf7e1e
Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j-tools
Nexus:
http
Hi Volkan,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 16:26, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta1.
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j
> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2
> Commit: c5dbdcfeb0216e1e3e333436e9b4d04cc3b8e6fd
> Distribution: http
Hi Piotr,
If you write "Please don't release this.", then you should vote -1. Or am I
missing something?
Gary
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, 3:33 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Volkan,
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 16:26, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> >
> > This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 13:40, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.7.0.
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 04d9a79fb5cadb791c9e66fc671d6c0ffedf7e1e
> Distribution: https
Given we will have several other betas before a GA release, do these issues
really constitute a serious blocker? Or they can be addressed in the next
beta?
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 21:32, Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Volkan,
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 16:26, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> >
> > This is a
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 21:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> If you write "Please don't release this.", then you should vote -1. Or am I
> missing something?
I don't think that will be necessary. I am reserving my vote for later. ;-)
Piotr
Hi Volkan,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 22:09, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> Given we will have several other betas before a GA release, do these issues
> really constitute a serious blocker? Or they can be addressed in the next
> beta?
These artifacts will pollute Maven Central and overly complicate the
v
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 3:08 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> Given we will have several other betas before a GA release, do these issues
> really constitute a serious blocker? Or they can be addressed in the next
> beta?
>
I can’t run the release verification commands you provided without this fix
+1
Tested src zip
ASC OK, SHA512 OK, build 'mvn clean verify' OK.
Apache Maven 3.9.6 (bc0240f3c744dd6b6ec2920b3cd08dcc295161ae)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.6/libexec
Java version: 17.0.9, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk@17/17.0.9/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home
