Re: [Flume] Integration with OpenTelemetry

A key feature for me is guaranteed delivery, which is why is sometimes I use JMS with Log4j. Gary On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 11:54 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a great post Matt! > > Fluentbit, Fluentd, Logstash, and Filebeat are the main tools used for log > forwarding. While they all have some

Logstash and Filebeat guaranteed delivery

Ralph, could you elaborate on your response, please? AFAIK, Logstash and Filebeat provide guaranteed delivery, if configured correctly. As a matter of fact they have docs (here and here

[log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

Heads up! #2021 bumps the `2.x` baseline to Java 17. Everything works locally. If CI agrees too, I will merge it tomorrow and start porting to `main`.

Re: [log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

Hi Volkan, On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 17:05, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Heads up! #2021 bumps > the `2.x` baseline to Java 17. Everything works locally. If CI agrees too, > I will merge it tomorrow and start porting to `main`. Nice job. This allows

Re: [Flume] Integration with OpenTelemetry

Oh yes, I’d still love to see how we can adapt the Log4j plugin system here! And yeah, this would likely make sense as its own repository. I’ll make a proposal about the OTel stuff before working on any code. — Matt Sicker > On Nov 29, 2023, at 22:54, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a great pos

Re: [log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

Sounds great! We even finally updated Spinnaker this week to build on Java 17, so great timing. — Matt Sicker > On Nov 30, 2023, at 10:03, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Heads up! #2021 bumps > the `2.x` baseline to Java 17. Everything works locall

Re: [log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

Hi Matt, On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 18:09, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Sounds great! We even finally updated Spinnaker this week to build on Java > 17, so great timing. As far as I have seen most Commons build on JDK 21. This might however be too high for us, since tests using SecurityManager start to f

Re: [log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

Nice! That means that 2.23.0 will require Java 17 at runtime right? Gary On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 11:05 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Heads up! #2021 bumps > the `2.x` baseline to Java 17. Everything works locally. If CI agrees too, > I will merge

Re: [log4j] Upgrade `2.x` compiler baseline to Java 17

No, only that it requires Java 17 to build. It still targets the Java 8 release profile. > On Nov 30, 2023, at 11:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Nice! That means that 2.23.0 will require Java 17 at runtime right? > > Gary > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 11:05 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > >> Heads

Re: [Flume] Integration with OpenTelemetry

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, at 18:04, Matt Sicker wrote: > Oh yes, I’d still love to see how we can adapt the Log4j plugin system > here! And yeah, this would likely make sense as its own repository. > I’ll make a proposal about the OTel stuff before working on any code. Please do. I would also lik

Re: Logstash and Filebeat guaranteed delivery

Volkan, Notice that neither of the links you have provided use the term “guaranteed delivery”. That is because that is not really what they are providing. In addition, notice that Logstash says "Input plugins that do not use a request-response protocol cannot be protected from data loss”, and