It looks like the doc already specified this behaviour for ternary operator
line wrapping. For your proposal I’ve also added the following:
It is usually preferable to carry the operator for multiline expressions, with
the exception of some multiline string literals.
Does that work for you? The
Congrats Aleksandr Sorokoumov on being raised to a Committer on the project.
It's been a pleasure working with you for a few years on the project and the
honor is well deserved.
[New contributor Getting Started]
First off, welcome! As a new contributor we recommend starting in one of two
places
> It looks like the doc already specified this behaviour for ternary
> operator line wrapping. For your proposal I’ve also added the following:
>
>
>
> It is usually preferable to carry the operator for multiline expressions,
> with the exception of some multiline string literals.
>
>
>
> Does that