which thrift version should I use?
on my mac osx:
$ thrift -version
Thrift version 20080411-r885091
If I compile cassandra.thrift (ant gen-thrift-java) the result is different
than what we have in trunk under
interface/thrift/gen-java/org/apache/cassandra/thrift/.
Many small diffs, so I guess I ha
If you look in the lib/ directory of the cassandra source you're
using, the libthrift jar has the version number in its name. For 0.6, it
is libthrift-r917130.jar for instance.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ran Tavory wrote:
> which thrift version should I use?
> on my mac osx:
> $ thrift -ver
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:25:15 -0500 Gary Dusbabek wrote:
GD> 2010/4/12 Ted Zlatanov :
>>
>> OK, I was hoping nodetool would support that operation. I wanted to use
>> something on the same machine as the Cassandra instance so I can
>> automate a complete install in QA, and jconsole won't work u
2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
> I agree loadSchemaFromXML should go away, although IMHO there should be
> an easy way through something bundled with Cassandra (nodetool or
> cassandra-cli) to dump, wipe, and restore the schema even though the
> general schema support is punted to external tools. Are yo
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:57:42 -0500 Gary Dusbabek wrote:
GD> 2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
>> I agree loadSchemaFromXML should go away, although IMHO there should be
>> an easy way through something bundled with Cassandra (nodetool or
>> cassandra-cli) to dump, wipe, and restore the schema even though
2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
>
> Should the functionality be exposed only through JMX, through nodetool,
> or through cassandra-cli? I'll create the ticket if you like and then I
> or whoever wants to can work on it.
>
> Ted
>
I prefer thrift (and nodetool), but I'd like to hear thoughts from the
com
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 08:44 -0500, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> 2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
> > Should the functionality be exposed only through JMX, through nodetool,
> > or through cassandra-cli? I'll create the ticket if you like and then I
> > or whoever wants to can work on it.
> I prefer thrift (and
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> If we're going to do this, I suggest a separate utility scoped at
> migrating existing definitions from an 0.6 configuration (and nothing
> else), and then deprecate it right off the bat (read: for removal in
> 0.8).
+1
+1
--
Jeff
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 08:44 -0500, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
>> 2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
>> > Should the functionality be exposed only through JMX, through nodetool,
>> > or through cassandra-cli? I'll create the ticket if you like and t
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:08:44 -0500 Eric Evans wrote:
EE> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 08:44 -0500, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
>> 2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
>> > Should the functionality be exposed only through JMX, through nodetool,
>> > or through cassandra-cli? I'll create the ticket if you like and then I
Should the dropped keyspace directories, being empty, get rmdir()ed?
When I run tests against a server the directory gets polluted but it's
not really a bug so I wasn't sure if it's worth a ticket.
Ted
Some thoughts I've had last night while handling a beer:
A web UI for Cassandra, will be sometimes querying remote APIs (JMX,
Thrift), for every node in the cluster.
So, about the non-blocking/blocking issue that Brandon pointed out:
-
In a totally synchronous/blocking approach, I expec
Please use something like Tornado. A Cassandra web GUI should not require a
heavyweight framework and hopefully nothing other than a Cassandra connection
to run.
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Cuadrado
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:55:46
To:
Subject: python web framework suggestions (for C
David:
Personally, I'm between Tornado and Pylons. I'm willing to run a few
test cases on both scenarios.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> Please use something like Tornado. A Cassandra web GUI should not require a
> heavyweight framework and hopefully nothing oth
I would be happy to help get this going on Tornado. I don't have experience
with Pylons.
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Cuadrado
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:33:11
To: ;
Subject: Re: python web framework suggestions (for Cassandra Web UI) needed
David:
Personally, I'm between Tornado an
Well, so far we are:
Pylons +3
Tornado +2
Django +1
Undetermined +2
I will do some tests and further research, and then I'll see if I
change my vote (now in Pylons) to Tornado.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> I would be happy to help get this going on Torn
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Pablo Cuadrado wrote:
> Well, so far we are:
>
> Pylons +3
> Tornado +2
> Django +1
> Undetermined +2
>
+1 for pylons. I think a more popular framework is likely to have better
chances of being maintained and avoiding bitrot in the long haul.
-Brandon
Pylons +4
Tornado +2
Django +1
Undetermined +2
Do I smell Pylons? :)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Pablo Cuadrado
> wrote:
>
>> Well, so far we are:
>>
>> Pylons +3
>> Tornado +2
>> Django +1
>> Undetermined +2
>>
>
> +1 for pylons.
I'll put in a vote for django, you can use managers to handle a lot of the
object code.
Ray Slakinski
On 2010-04-13, at 2:15 PM, Pablo Cuadrado wrote:
> Pylons +4
> Tornado +2
> Django +1
> Undetermined +2
>
> Do I smell Pylons? :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
We might as well fix that. You can file a ticket.
2010/4/13 Ted Zlatanov :
> Should the dropped keyspace directories, being empty, get rmdir()ed?
> When I run tests against a server the directory gets polluted but it's
> not really a bug so I wasn't sure if it's worth a ticket.
>
> Ted
>
>
tornado +1 - it's lightweight and has few external dependencies.
Pylons +4
Tornado +3
Django +1
Undetermined +2
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ray Slakinski wrote:
> I'll put in a vote for django, you can use managers to handle a lot of the
> object code.
>
> Ray Slakinski
>
> On 2010-04-13,
-1 vote for Tornado. As far as I know, it still doesn't run on Windows and
has had only 2 releases. I don't think it makes sense to push that as a
dependency to potential deployers of this UI.
There are many alternatives with broader platform support and more
consistent mainline releases: Bottle
Yes, in the big picture, I guess Pylons has a greater community and adoption.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Miguel Verde wrote:
> -1 vote for Tornado. As far as I know, it still doesn't run on Windows and
> has had only 2 releases. I don't think it makes sense to push that as a
> dependency
Not going to vote either way, as I haven't contributed to Cassandra in over
a year :) But one quick opinion:
The big downside I see with Django and other WSGI based frameworks is that
it becomes difficult to run "background threads" in a clean way. Someone
mentioned this earlier, but worth repeati
Todd:
Very valuable comments, that's just the kind of problem I believe
should be addressed with an asynchronous approach.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Not going to vote either way, as I haven't contributed to Cassandra in over
> a year :) But one quick opinion:
>
> Th
I think that it's silly to hold this to a vote, frankly. Do the research,
weigh the pros and cons, and then make a decision. It's you who's going to
be doing the implementation, so the choice is something that you can live
with. Holding something like this to a vote is just going to invite flame
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Eric Florenzano wrote:
> I think that it's silly to hold this to a vote, frankly. Do the research,
> weigh the pros and cons, and then make a decision. It's you who's going to
> be doing the implementation, so the choice is something that you can live
> with. H
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> The big downside I see with Django and other WSGI based frameworks is that
> it becomes difficult to run "background threads" in a clean way.
This can be handled by using Eventlet or GEvent. See the gevent webchat
demo, for example, to see
People:
The "votation" is not relevant, the discussion is, and the reasons
that support each vote. And those are itself part of the research I'm
doing, and it surely will help in making the decision.
But, they are an important part, because I didn't want to make a
decision in "solo", since this i
29 matches
Mail list logo
