Re: Bug#935128: aspell: potentially unbounded buffer over-read in GNU Aspell 0.60.*

2019-08-28 Thread Agustin Martin
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:33:40PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/aspell-announce/2019-08/msg0.html > > > Within Debian the "pumpa" will need an update. Others might be > > required as well. Kevin Atki

Re: Bug#935128: aspell: potentially unbounded buffer over-read in GNU Aspell 0.60.*

2019-08-29 Thread Agustin Martin
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:32:35PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Agustin Martin wrote: > > > This message is sent to all packages that depend in some way on > > libaspell15 (pdo addresses bcc'ed) > > > > A potentially unbounded buffer

Re: Bug#935128: Packages potentially affected by unbounded buffer over-read in GNU Aspell 0.60.*

2019-08-30 Thread Agustin Martin
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:20:28AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:33:40PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > > See > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/aspell-announce/2019-

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-28 Thread Agustin Martin
El mar, 25 oct 2022 a las 20:43, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > While we wait for answers as to whether these dictionaries can be used by the > Chromium package and how they might possibly be integrated with upstream > Hunspell, I would recommend that we move forward with packaging them in /usr/ >

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-13 Thread Agustin Martin
El jue, 3 nov 2022 a las 23:33, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 4:09:45 AM MST Agustin Martin wrote: > > I am not particularly happy about this (see details below), but seems > > we will have to package all these .bdic files because qtwebengine and >

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-06 Thread Agustin Martin
El dom, 4 dic 2022 a las 4:54, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > I created an MR: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/5 > > Please review and make sure I haven’t missed anything or misrepresented the > consensus. Merged. Will wait some days for possible new com

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-09 Thread Agustin Martin
El mar, 6 dic 2022 a las 23:34, Agustin Martin () escribió: > > El dom, 4 dic 2022 a las 4:54, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > > > I created an MR: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/5 > > > > Please review

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-13 Thread Agustin Martin
El mar, 13 dic 2022 a las 18:43, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > Can one of the Debian Qt/KDE maintainers weigh in on the feasibility of > either creating a meta package that depends on the most recent package that > includes qwebengine_convert_dict or creating an unversioned package that > inst

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-05 Thread Agustin Martin
El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 21:30, Soren Stoutner () escribió: > > On Thursday, September 22, 2022 9:20:46 AM MST Agustin Martin wrote: > > > First of all, I am curious about the reasons behind this new format, > > the problems it deals with and its advantages. I assume they