gcc-snapshot_20070811-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20070811-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070811-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20070811-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070811-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20070811-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070811-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot

Bug#434274: marked as done (gcc-snapshot 20070720-1 fails to compile trivial code)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:32:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#434274: gcc-snapshot 20070720-1 fails to compile trivial code has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#423733: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:34:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423733: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070515-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Changed email address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 315713 ! Bug#315713: sudoedit - wrong gid of new files Changed Bug submitter from Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 317928 ! Bug#317928: aptitude: visual mode does not check terminal capabiliti

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jul 2007 20:57:22 +0200, a écrit : > Here are updated patches. Btw, they are needed in gcj-4.2 too of course (and they already do apply fine). Samuel

Processed: cloning 408888, retitle -1 to gcj-4.2: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > clone 40 -1 Bug#40: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Bug 40 cloned as bug 437470. > retitle -1 gcj-4.2: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Bug#437470: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Changed Bug tit

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Samuel Thibault writes: > Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jul 2007 20:57:22 +0200, a écrit : > > Here are updated patches. > > Btw, they are needed in gcj-4.2 too of course (and they already do apply > fine). Btw, I don't care that much about the Hurd to do these "trivial" changes myself. They cost ti

Bug#437470: gcj-4.2: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Here is for gcj-4.2 a patch to be appended to the previously posted libjava-hurdfix.dpatch for gcj-4.1. Samuel Index: libjava/java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc === --- libjava/java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc(révision 127274) +++ libja

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Hi, Matthias Klose, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 20:34:26 +0200, a écrit : > Please send patches against the current debian svn, and actively > forward tested patches to upstream. What is "the current debian svn"? I have already forwarded those patches upstream, but they seem to take a lot of time just to

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Samuel Thibault, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 20:42:50 +0200, a écrit : > Matthias Klose, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 20:34:26 +0200, a écrit : > > Please send patches against the current debian svn, and actively > > forward tested patches to upstream. > > What is "the current debian svn"? Oops, sorry, you probably

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Samuel Thibault writes: > Hi, > > Matthias Klose, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 20:34:26 +0200, a écrit : > > Please send patches against the current debian svn, and actively > > forward tested patches to upstream. > > What is "the current debian svn"? svn://svn.debian.org/svn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.1 s

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Matthias Klose, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 20:55:48 +0200, a écrit : > all patches which were approved, are comitted to the trunk. Oh, indeed, I must have missed the update, sorry. > sorry, but please submit patches for 4.1 and 4.2 as debian patches to > the debian bts. That's OK. These svn urls should

Processed: reassign 437470 to gcj-4.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > reassign 437470 gcj-4.2 Bug#437470: gcj-4.2: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.1' to `gcj-4.2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processing of gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15_i386.changes

gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15.dsc gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2.orig.tar.gz gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Bug#408888: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

Hi, Here is an update of the libjava-hurdfix patch: part of it is already in libjava-maxhostnamelen.dpatch now. I'm working on the port to 4.2. Samuel Index: debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpatch === --- debian/patches/libjava-hurdf

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.2-15_multi.changes

gcc-4.1_4.1.2-15_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gobjc++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.1-doc_4.1.2-15_all.deb gobjc-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb gcc-4.1-source_4.1.2-15_all.deb libgfortran1_4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb gobjc++-4.1_4.1

gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15_i386.changes is NEW

(new) gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15.diff.gz standard devel (new) gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15.dsc standard devel (new) gdc-4.1_0.23-4.1.2-15_i386.deb optional devel The D compiler This is the D compiler, which compiles D on platforms supported by the gcc compiler. It uses the GCC backend to generate optimised c

gcc-4.1_4.1.2-15_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1.2-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-15_i386.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-15_i386.deb g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-15_powerpc

Bug#422469: marked as done (gjdoc: upgrade fails with "invalid pointer" when /proc not mounted)

y subset kit) treelang-4.1 - The GNU Treelang compiler Closes: 312367 317983 403460 40 422469 423094 423160 433539 Changes: gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-15) unstable; urgency=low . [Matthias Klose] * Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20070812. . * Period of grace is over, turn on again the te

Bug#423094: marked as done (Binary without manpage: gappletviewer-4.1)

g compiler Closes: 312367 317983 403460 40 422469 423094 423160 433539 Changes: gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-15) unstable; urgency=low . [Matthias Klose] * Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20070812. . * Period of grace is over, turn on again the testsuite on m68k. * Update infrastructure for

Bug#423160: marked as done (gij-4.1: bug in EnumMap implementation)

bstdc++6-4.1-pic - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (shared library subset kit) treelang-4.1 - The GNU Treelang compiler Closes: 312367 317983 403460 40 422469 423094 423160 433539 Changes: gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-15) unstable; urgency=low . [Matthias Klose] * Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20

Bug#433539: marked as done (gcc-4.1: profiling support on hurd)

(4.1.2-15) unstable; urgency=low . [Matthias Klose] * Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20070812. . * Period of grace is over, turn on again the testsuite on m68k. * Update infrastructure for the gcc-source package (Bastian Blank). * Update profiling on the Hurd (Samuel Thibault,

Bug#408888: marked as done (gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd)

+ Library v3 (development files) libstdc++6-4.1-doc - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (documentation files) libstdc++6-4.1-pic - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (shared library subset kit) treelang-4.1 - The GNU Treelang compiler Closes: 312367 317983 403460 40 422469 423094 423160 433539

Processed: Re: Bug#408888 closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 40 Bug#40: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)

reopen 40 thanks Unfortunately no, as I said in my latest mail (and provided a patch), libjava.maxhostnamelen.dpatch does part of what libjava-hurdfix.dpatch already does, so that they conflict when building on hurd-i386 (libjava-hurdfix is only enabled on hurd-i386). Samuel -- To UNSUBSCR