Bug#191684: libstdc++5 3.3 breaks optimized binaries compiled with g++ 3.2

2003-05-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Babcock writes: > After upgrading libstdc++5 from the 3.2 version to the 3.3 version, my > c++ binaries started to segfault. I traced the problem to this test > case: [...] > Compile this with g++-3.2 -O3 -finline-limit=1000 and running it will > segfault. The same binary will work using

gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-

gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-

Bug#191607: marked as done (libstdc++5-dbg: Actual library missing from package)

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191607: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#191008: marked as done (hurd-i386 should use /usr/include, not /include)

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191008: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#190964: marked as done (gcc-3.2: No .mo files included in the package?)

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#190964: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#186233: marked as done (gcc-3.2: Internal error: Killed (program gnat1) when compiling an ada file)

2003-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186233: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Results for 3.2.3 testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-05-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test XPASS:

Results for 3.2.3 testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

2003-05-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7378 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 88