does ([0-9].[0-9])([0-9]?) help ?
i noticed having 2 pairs of () added a . in the Debian version.
Regards,
--
Niv Altivanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian::GNU/Linux::Addict, Wannabe Debian Developper,
please test my packages: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian
pgpuQ7Q0xO7NZ.pgp
Descriptio
maintain, the package at work.
I will take care of the packaging and maintain the package.
I got help from Debian Developers Vincent Bernat and Sylvestre Ledru
to prepare the package.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTwpMVXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
On 7/25/2011 6:27 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
I believe it's high time we start to providing Debian in form of official
virtualisation images. In contrast to the ISOs currently provided it
allows a quicker evaluation/testing of Debian (and can also be very
useful for testing (e.g. so
:
> What is the minimum most value thing that would
> help YOU accomplish your goals for Debian ?
Check out this page if no-one gives anything more specific:
https://www.debian.org/intro/help
Paul, Marc, Andrey
Thanks for replying.
To narrow it down:
*Vision of Debian:*
Create
Subject: ITP: evremap -- keyboard input remapper for Linux/Wayland systems
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Yifei Zhan
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: evremap
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Wez Furlong
* URL : https://github.com
Package: wnpp
Subject: ITP: wprs -- rootless remote desktop access for remote Wayland and X11
applications like xpra
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Yifei Zhan
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wprs
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: Nicolas Avrutin
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: deb...@thola.io
* Package name: golang-github-inexio-go-monitoringplugin
Version : 0.0~git20201117.ec06ef4-1
Upstream Author : inexio
* URL : https://github.com/inexio/go-monitoringplugin
* License : BSD-2-clause
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: deb...@thola.io
* Package name: golang-github-huandu-go-sqlbuilder
Version : 1.12.0-1
Upstream Author : Huan Du
* URL : https://github.com/huandu/go-sqlbuilder
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: deb...@thola.io
* Package name: golang-github-huandu-go-assert
Version : 1.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Huan Du
* URL : https://github.com/huandu/go-assert
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Magic asse
butions,
> as Adam brought up, you might want to further ask them to make that clear
> from the project name, say rpm-distribution-openpgp-keys or similar. But
> in any case regardless of the intended target use, it still seems like a
> very generic name which can be easily confused
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
On XFCE, despite having single click to open elsewhere, there is no option to
single click folders to select them, would be very nice if this were changed
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 's
ding to some stats that could be 100 people. Is there any
> ISO standard that is inclusive of those uncounted people?
You have reached the Debian Oracle. Please allow the Oracle to translate
Steve's message to plain English. Steve is a great guy, but he
occasionally uses difficult words and c
Hi,
in case I am in the wrong list, I beg you pardon, but I asked this
already in debian-user without success.
I would like to build customized, configured packages (for example
additional bash script for the bash package, some default keybindings
for screen, some host in /etc/ssh/known_hosts
Am 15.05.2006 um 10:32 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:49:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> Custom *packages* is probably more on-topic for debian-mentors, but I
don't
> think that custom packages are the right solution.
>
Sorry
A message you sent to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
contained Worm.SomeFool.P and has not been delivered.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I'm an Italian undergraduate student of Informatics in Trento. I love
Debian and I've used it from a lot of years. I've also invited and
helped my friends to use it.
This year I would like to do something that is useful for the Debian
project and for me, so I'
asier to find an item in a short menu"
> > | \
> > mail -s "Re: Bugs in default GNOME etch?"
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > echo "everyone else: it's impossible to find an item that isn't
> > there" | \
> > mail -s "Re: Bugs in defa
On ti, 2007-03-06 at 15:31 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > mdk2 is a tool designed to crash 802.11 wireless network.
...
> What's the non-black hat purpose of this tool?
The Debian Oracle is glad you asked! This is an important fashion
question: what headware should one ask when usi
How come no one told me
> about this?
The Debian Oracle is mighty glad you asked that question! It's about
time someone did.
The tale of how the existence of apt-file was suppressed from the Debian
developer community is one of the more sordid and shameful ones in
Debian. It has all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> For that, you will have to ask the ftp masters and the security team. I
> am not in a position to speak to their official stance in terms of what
> requirements they might have for software like opera to be in D
type library for Moose
Almost perfect CPAN Testers reports, no open bug in RT, code is sane.
Copyright and license information seems clear enough to me in the source.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
of Perl 5 you may have available.
Description : NetAddr::IP related types and coercions library for Moose
No open bug in RT, code is sane, almost perfect CPAN Testers reports.
Every dependency is in Debian already.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
On 06 Nov 2003 01:06:25 -0500, Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
debian-devel:
> Personally I'm of the opinion that stable is useless. It certainly
> has no use for me. Perhaps if I ran a production server on debian I
> might think otherwise but I rather doubt it. W
subscribe
David Coe wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A user has filed a wishlist bug against (potato) wenglish because the
> (slink) symlink from /usr/dict/words is now a symlink from
> /usr/share/dict/words, per FHS. This user would like /usr/dict/words
> reinstated as a symlink to the user's preferred word list.
尊敬的客户：
通用网址(快捷网址、网络实名)――网络地址新形象
直接输入企业、产品、网站的名称，即可直达目标网站 无需记忆复杂的域名、网址，
无需 http://、www 、 .com、.net等前后缀，是继IP、域名之后，最先进、最快捷、
最方便的第三代互联网访问标准 。
允许个人注册，开放通用词汇注册并可自由转让，商机无限！
通用网址带来更多访客与商机
1、客户无需死记硬背复杂的域名/网址，凭着简单的记忆、在浏览器地址栏输入印象
中的名字，即可找到您。
2、不必注册所有的顶级域名，降低企业经营成本！ 严格的服务选择原则，保护公司
商标权和全球性、区域性识别！
3、当输入
Package: general
Version: 20010909
Severity: grave
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux tarjei 2.2.19pre17 #1 Tue Mar 13 22:37:59 EST 2001 i586
unknown
The error is as following:
I installed the apachepackage as normal. Then when I tried to install
hot)
- Display view, procedure and trigger source code (Screenshot)
- Display foreign key constraints between tables (Screenshot)
- SQLWorkbench/J is free ( published under the Apache 2.0 license)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
ss of updating and cleaning up the packaging debian/
directory shipped in upstream SVN, aiming at putting the package in
good shape so that it can be uploaded into the Debian archive.
I intend to maintain this package in collab-maint to start with.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
/libgsecuredelete
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/857h6zq4w6@boum.org
/webmasters.boum.org/nautiluswipe
Note that nautilus-wipe depends on libgsecuredelete, which just had
its own ITP filed.
Bye,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
il to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ty9dmnx1@boum.org
hi all,
recently on IRC, i asked why "to exclude specific archs in
Recommends/Suggests?".
the use case is, that some package "foo" might not be available for a
specific arch (e.g. FTBFS on hurd-any), and package "bar" would still
like to recommend it (since "bar" is used together with "foo" 'in a
Hi,
I am deeply sorry if I'm on the wrong list. I am not a newcomer to
Debian, but I didn't take the time to dig in all the lists and processes.
Recently, I saw some PHP modules that hit testing and were only compiled
against PHP 7.3:
- php-apcu (#911719)
- php-igbinary (#911670)
-
On 11/16/18 3:14 PM, Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
> package repository, sure we can change the project's setting, but
> debian/.gitlab-ci.yml seems to be the proper default setting.
i don't think there is any reason to use a (hidden) dotfile in the
debian/ directory.
the default uses a
e in buster), starting with a new
version (1.01.0).
as mandated by the policy, i'd like to discuss, whether an epoch bump
for the new source package "pd-csound" (to be "2:1.01.0-1") is
warranted, or indeed a good idea.
the first version of Csound in Debian seems to have been
.
>
> If they are unwilling to change the version number, then bumping the
> epoch seems like a correct Debian-level workaround for the version
> numbering scheme having been reset.
i asked upstream, and their answer is:
> The version was always 1.00 even when it was inside Csound
On 05.12.18 20:19, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04-12-2018 20:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
>> as mandated by the policy, i'd like to discuss, whether an epoch bump
>> for the new source package "pd-csound" (to be "2:1.01.0-1") is
&g
On 13.05.19 18:22, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
> Holger> - packages using cdbs. cdbs has features dh doesnt have and
> Holger> I dont think it's wrong to use cdbs. (
>
> Just for my information, what are the big features cdbs has that dh does
> not?
>
On 14.05.19 14:35, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I'm quite interested in taking a look at how cdbs deal with such case.
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/snd/blob/master/debian/rules
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/soundscaperenderer/blob/master/debian/rules
gfmdsrt
IOhannes
On 17.06.19 06:53, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Whether I use apt-get source and debdiff or dgit
> and git format-patch is a detail on my side.
out of curiosity (and because i usually quite enjoy your patches): do
you do use dgit in *your* workflow?
fgmadsr
IOhannes
On 7/21/23 12:57, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi folks,
But I see no mechanism for interacting with autopkgtests to force them
to re-run due to the remedy of a defect in the test harness itself.
How is this to be done?
you mean, apart from clicking on the ♻ retry icon?
(you probably have to b
i386 images including non-free, but apparently
only "full installation" ISOs, that (i suspected) wouldn't fit on my
already crammed USB-stick.
(i've been installing Debian since 1998 or so, and I don't think I ever
used anything but the netinstaller. i'd like to keep it t
On 11/3/21 23:34, Felix Lechner wrote:
1. Did anyone find the latest Lintian versions (2.109.0 and up)
confusing as to whether the :any should be included? The material you
would have encountered includes both the context offered by Lintian
(the extra information after the tag) and any relevant t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: csound-plugins
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Csound Developers
* URL : https://github.com/csound/plugins
* License : LGPL
guess, because there are no messages
from anything in the Debian archive telling me what went wrong.
My recollection is that if the signature on the upload is invalid, we
intentionally delete the upload with no notice (because we have no
confirmed knowledge of who to notify). It's possible
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dh-puredata
Version : 1
Upstream Author : IOhannes m zmölnig
* URL : * https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/dh-puredata
On 21.11.19 10:55, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> 1. Shortens tag names.
> I do not see how that is a good thing.
>
> "debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding" is a sentence, which
> inherently makes it extremely human-readable. For a tool that is
> primari
>>> future then the name makes a little more sense. Otherwise if they can
>>> change the name to nss-https or something else to avoid confusion.
>> Would it make sense to resolve that with upstream before introducing this to
>> Debian? It would save a trip through New and
On 4/25/20 8:34 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/security/two_factor_authentication.html
>
> Enforce that (if Salsa is doing that in the meantime, ignore me).
i hope you don't suggest to enforce 2FA system-wide for all users of salsa.
i read you original mail as a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
* Package name: python-bottle-cork
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Federico Ceratto
* URL : http://cork.firelet.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
* Package name: python-bottle-sqlite
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Marcel Hellkamp
* URL : http://bottlepy.org/docs/dev/plugins/sqlite.html
* License : MIT
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
* Package name: python-bottle-beaker
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Thiago Avelino
* URL : https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle-beaker
* License : MIT
Programming La
Control: retitle -1 ITP: python-can -- Controller Area Network interface module
for Python
Thanks.
Ooops, seems like i forgot the subject in this ITP
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:09:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> T
> * URL : https://github.com/cherti/mailexporter
The correct URL seems to be https://github.com/cherti/xattrvi
Interesting piece of software though.
Adrien
On 01/04/2017 05:42 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> git-dpm does too, and I agree it's nice.
here's an opposite data point:
being forced to use git-dpm by the python-modules-team policy - i
haven't had a single joyful experience with git-dpm.
so far, every import of a new upstream release turned into a
On 2018-01-22 16:14, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Depending on the version of salsa's gitlab, this MR might be applicable
>> for debian/changelog:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/16550
>>
>> The issue on th
On 2018-03-05 12:18, Gert Wollny wrote:
> (1) Given that all new source package come with an ITP bug, when a
> package must be rejected, the FTP team could CC this bug in the
> rejection message.
i would really like to see this.
sometimes i miss rejection emails - or at least wonder whether i miss
ied "netgen"?
if the latter, you might just put the unchanged names into something
like /usr/share/netgen/bin/ and tell users to add to that to their PATH
when running their scripts.
that provides a simple compat layer for out-of-distro scripts.
rdeps in Debian should be pa
not exposed to the public internet.
Most ACME-related packages in Debian only deal with http-01 challenges.
This one deals with dns-01.
I intend to maintain this package under the "Debian Let's Encrypt" umbrella
(provided that the team accepts this :-))
from their general usefulness (for the spatial audio community), ffmpeg
and vlc recently switched to libmysofa for reading SOFA-files, it might be a
good idea to have these dependencies in Debian.
I intend to maintain libmysofa under the pkg-multimedia umbrella.
On 2017-09-20 14:50, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what is the reason why alioth.debian.org can't be reached? A
> traceroute for git.debian.org stops at bm-bl1.debian.org
> (5.153.231.241).
[#debian-devel] /topic
14:57 -!- Topic for #debian-devel: Alioth current
On 10/05/2017 06:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Bad checksums on loki_2.4.7.4-7_source.changes: Checksum mismatch for file
> loki_2.4.7.4-7.dsc: b4d2841416822842e6e6b85c44e3f4f3 !=
> 7acc0c03ab3a269d117decd6dd692967
>
> What to try next?
following this conversation with interest, i also tried te
On 12/04/2017 04:41 PM, eamanu15 . wrote:
>>3- if yes, let the user decide:
>>
>> "Your network card/wifi adapter needs non-free spftware to operate. You
>> may choose to keep this install 100% free software, in which case you
>> will have no network connection until you plug-in a supported ada
On 2017-12-20 15:51, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 02:31:42PM +, Wookey wrote:
>> As a porter I notice quite a few packages where the maintainer has
>> made things 'tidy' by giving an explicit architecture list when really
>> the unlisted ones were really just 'doesn't build
On 2017-12-20 15:31, Wookey wrote:
> Leaving it open wontfix makes it easy for someone to find the issue in
> the future and see what decision was made and why, and that the
> current situation is as correct as we can currently make it. But
> closing is also OK IMHO. The reasoning will still get ar
On 07/11/2015 04:17 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>> I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging.
>> See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status.
>
> That is quite a progress. Awesome, thanks!
>
indeed, that status
On 09/28/2015 08:41 PM, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> indeed, that status page got my very excited.
> Maintainer of that status page here. :)
>>
>> however, i wonder whether that page is actually getting the status
>> live or if somebody forgot to update it in the last few months...
>
> I just u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-15 09:59, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand
>
>
> * Package name: python-pulp Version : 1.6.0 Upstream
> Author : Stuart Anthony Mitchell * URL
> : https://github.com/coin-or/pulp
On 2015-11-02 22:55, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It's not the package which is a bad practice, here, the maintainer is
> only dealing with upstream.
>
> What's a bad practice is creating a library for 2 lines of code.
> Upstream should have tried to integrate this function into a bigger
> library with
On 2015-09-28 20:09, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 04:17 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen
>> wrote:
>>> I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging.
>>> See balasan
On 01/31/2016 10:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Instead of introducing new flags, I suggest to extend existing flags to
> support "relative URLs" which are somewhere within Debian.
>
> E.g.
[...]
>
> Vcs-Git: pkg-perl/packages/ciderwebmail
>
yes
On 2016-02-09 20:03, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:38:26AM -0700, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> On another Jessie machine I had to apply the same workaround to some
>> additional services. I identified the services that needed the workaround
>> by grepping for 'PrivateTmp' in /l
On 2016-02-10 14:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> There's an RC bug... :P
>
> # ./pkgquiz
> Collecting package information...
that's because you are in cheat mode.
try playing with "--hard".
ghsdt
IOhannes
bleshoot the error. It seems I'm missing something simple,
>>> I tried to follow debconf tutorial and compare many times, but only to see
>>> a cryptic error message.
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/41
>>
>> This issue
ream was just a
proxy to the "real" upstreams?
however, if "bar" gets packaged on it's own (which probably only makes
sense if it provides additional features - e.g. because the repackaged
source stripped out some components and/or doesn't track upupstream's
develo
ly don't see any compelling reason why a package like gitlab
should force me to use any special means to encrypt my connection.
there are a number of reasons to use the Debian gitlab packages over the
ones provided by upstream (e.g. omnibus), and one of them is being able
to chose the components i
t in depends, it asks in post
> install if letsencrypt should be used. Now it is in recommends and you can
> just skip letsencrypt.
cool. thank you.
>> there are a number of reasons to use the Debian gitlab packages over
>> the
>> ones provided by upstream (e.g. omnibus),
On 2016-04-11 11:48, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> It would be a good time to add letsencrypt support to php-horde and every
> other service dealing with sensitive data like passwords.
no, seriously not.
i am all for having all web traffic encrypted. that's why the web-server
package *may* push for enc
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pd-slip
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/pd-externals/slip
* URL : https://github.com/pd-externals/slip
* License
ep in mind that not all Debian contributors are native
speakers so you probably should go easy on the subtle differences
between the various subjunctive forms. so unless somebody uses "SHALL
(as in RFC-2119)", I would assume that the "shall" is a mere suggestion).
If you
On 9/2/24 03:19, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
However, the pipeline is still failing, now in reprotest. For example
<https://salsa.debian.org/debian/apt-listchanges/-/jobs/6215633#L1650>.
Perhaps this is because I haven't yet finalized the changelog for the
upcoming release so the trai
The fact that the license is buggy does not change the fact
that works licensed under it would violate the DFSG. Given that, any
resolution to allow these works to remain in Debian would require a
rider to be added to the SC, something of the form:
- Debian will remain 100% free
+ Debian wil
Le Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
>
> For these reasons, we are delaying the full archive freeze for a few days.
> We haven't chosen a date yet, but you can still expect it to happen in
> October or early November.
Dear Andreas,
May I suggest to delay the freeze a
Friday, 28 Oct 2006
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Friday, 10 Nov 2006
The following DRAFT ballot is for voting on a immediate procedural vote to
determine if the Debian project Leaders decision to un-delegate policy
delegates remain on hold until the full vote is called, in accordance
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "MJ Ray (Debian)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: irc2html.scm
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mjr.towers.org.uk/software.html#other
* License
General info
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests should always be sent to
the -request address of a mailing list.
If a mailing list is called for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then
the -request address can be inferred from this to b
General info
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests should always be sent to
the -request address of a mailing list.
If a mailing list is called for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then
the -request address can be inferred from this to b
Aach, no sleep for the wicked this darkling eve ... at least not for me.
or morning, whatever.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:57:41AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> Good point :-) I hope NM can be improved as well. I've got someone that
> I know will help the Alpha port that's still in
simply the most engaging. Caught _you_ checking
back in, didn't we? :;-}
> This is Debian, so s/Assign more people/Get more volunteers/.
Beware circular logic. This just means that the first thing to do is accept
people that would like to learn the ins and outs of the application process.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:05:26AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
...sigh.
Exhibit A:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, erik wrote:
> [lots of stuff deleted -- basically a bitch about new maintainer]
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:57:41AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > Good point :-)
>
> Not really
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:54:32PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > Purpose of Rant: Stir up the coals ...
>
> Have you already put some meat?
>
Yes, but unfortunately it was all devoured immediately by ravenous wolves.
Barely raw as well... and apparently there was some indigestion therea
retitle 180188 ITA: Defoma -- Debian Font Manager
N.B. Here follows the description as is in the stable distribution:
Defoma, which stands for DEbian FOnt MAnager, provides a framework of
automatic font configuration. An application whose configuration of
fonts requires users' hand can mak
retitle 180188 ITA: defoma -- Debian Font Manager
thanks
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Debian-IN team"
* Package name: ttf-indic-nonfree-fonts
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : various
* URL : N/A
* License : various nonfree
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : Nonfree fonts for Indic langu
Le Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:41:41PM +0200, RalfGesellensetter a écrit :
> Dear list,
>
> Custom Debian Distributions are getting en vogue: After Debian-Edu
> (Skolelinux) and Debian-Med, Debian-Office had been proposed.
>
> Now, I bear this idea in mind:
>
> Combine t
>
>Hi,
>Is there an easy way to make a chart automatically include new rows as
>they are entered?
>I currently have a spreadsheet with three columns: A, B and C.
>Column A contains dates (i.e. the period, ex: June 2005)
>Column B and C contains figures for the period.
>
iver a 100% free operating system
| (Social Contract #1);
|
| 3. Given that we have known for two previous releases that we have
| non-free bits in various parts of Debian, and a lot of progress has
| been made, and we are almost to the point where we can provide a
| free version of
iver a 100% free operating system
| (Social Contract #1);
|
| 3. Given that we have known for two previous releases that we have
| non-free bits in various parts of Debian, and a lot of progress has
| been made, and we are almost to the point where we can provide a
| free version of the D
the free software
| community (Social Contract #4);
|
| 2. We acknowledge that we promised to deliver a 100% free operating system
| (Social Contract #1);
|
| 3. Given that we have known for two previous releases that we have
| non-free bits in various parts of Debian, and a lot of pr
1 - 100 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
