Hi
> First, what is DOG, I never heard about it.
"In the debian/changelog for octave2.9 (and all other packages maintained
collectively by the Debian Octave Group, the DOG)"
Start of Thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01378.html
> Second, I'm a member of the debian-i
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 18:20 +0200 schrieb Niklas Vainio:
> Please take a few minutes to answer the survey at
> http://hiisi.fi/survey/debian
Some suggestions:
Surveys from a university should have a place on the university's
webserver -- they look official.
Question 11 (income):
Is t
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 18:56 -0500 schrieb Christopher Peterman:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: gtkedit
> Version : 0.1/b1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://gtkedit1.sourceforge.net
> * License
Hi Lionel,
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 22:11 +0100 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
> What does that mean and how do I get out of this dead-end? Thanks in
> advance.
Does this one help?
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2003-07/0133.shtml
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 12:50 +0100 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Feb 09, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are two different definitions of the word software:
> > 1. something that can be represented as a finite stream of bits
> > 2. a computer program
> >
> > Definition 1
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 09:37 +0100 schrieb Xavier Roche:
> But I still consider documentation different than softwares, and don't see
> any major problem regarding the FDL.
Well, there are cases where the differences are totally unclear. Let's
start with PostScript files, go to interactive PDF
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server?
I guess the orig
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:31 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> * Package name: w3c-linkchecker
> Version : 4.2.1
> Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
> * License : W3C Software License
>
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> > Eh, is this the same program that comes as "checklink" with the
> > w3c-markup-validator?
>
> Please see #263716 and #324028
Thanks for that one; as I'm using the checklink command, but not the
validator, I'm looking forwa
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2006, 02:28 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> .These fonts canNOT be used with X11 or for printing.
I suggest writing this as 'can NOT'. It's easier to parse and (with the
idea of descriptions' translations in mind) comes closer to what happens
in a translation -- at
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 11:18 +1000 schrieb Brian May:
> Besides, it is yet-another message I receive and I have to process -
> keeping the message around for another week in case the moderator wont
> accept the message is highly annoying and probably will mean that the
> bug report gets
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2006, 10:52 +1000 schrieb Brian May:
> * In one case you can usually assume the maintainer got the message,
> in the other case you practically got confirmation that the message
> didn't get through.
>
> * If the maintainer doesn't respond, you can always send a ping
Am Freitag, den 18.08.2006, 11:27 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
> > http://www.movidis.com/products/rev.asp
>
> Has anyone contacted movidis/cavium of getting this system supported
> in etch? It would make a nice bullet in etch release notes :)
According to the linked informationweek article in Adri
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2006, 21:22 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set as
> the maintainer of a package would have mail filters configured this way in
> the first place. For the samba packaging team, for instance, I've taken
> pains
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.09.2006, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka
fEnIo:
> Please tell me what's wrong with *current* package and what can we do to
> make it better and stop saying me it's license issue.
IIRC, one of the things that lead to the rejection of the mplayer
package last time:
ht
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 21:50 -0800 schrieb Will Lowe:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.html
mentions several rsync sites.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UN
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2007, 23:32 -0400 schrieb Muammar Wadih El
Khatib Rodriguez:
> Ryuichi, may I take over the webmagick package?
>
> If you agree or don't reply, I'll take over the webmagick package.
Did you put Ryuichi's mail address in BCC (same goes for Luciano's
mail)? Otherwise
I don't have a particular opinion for Java in Debian or not, but there
are some points you raise:
Am Sonntag, den 21.05.2006, 12:34 -0500 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> In that case, ftpmasters accepted it, end of discussion.
Don't you think that the main problem here is that there *wasn't* any
disc
Am Sonntag, den 21.05.2006, 15:58 -0500 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> No, if we should discuss before taking any action we wouldn't get
> anything done.
Oh, come on. Nobody expects you to ask before updating a simple package.
> If you really want to contest the decision, you have the
> GR.
ROFL, ye
Hi,
is it possible for a 'building' package to send a mail to the buildd
admin of the current buildd machine (i.e. something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Reason: somewhere around Sep-Nov 2005, an alternative symlink was left
by the octave2.1 package in state 'manual'. This means that packages
build-
Hi,
first off, I'm neither a DD nor an NM, but I do some packaging work
(thanks to alioth), As most people here argue against CDBS, I think the
benefits of it are missed (if you didn't guess, I use it and I like it).
Am Freitag, den 09.06.2006, 15:10 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Jun 0
Am Samstag, den 10.06.2006, 15:38 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Oh, I disagree; I think I have a pretty good idea what the benefits are of
> CDBS, I just think that many CDBS proponents underemphasize the *downside*
> of CDBS.
>
> So tell me, how do you know a priori whether the software you're
Am Sonntag, den 11.06.2006, 11:30 +0100 schrieb Mark Brown:
> That's a bit different: updating the debhelper compat level is updated
> by the maintainer explicitly changing the package rather than by
> installing a new version of debhelper.
Well, I certainly agree that it is a bug if CDBS changes
Am Sonntag, den 25.06.2006, 18:11 +0300 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> I doubt we need a policy change for this. At some point, we need to stop
> legislating and start assuming the package maintainers have common
> sense.
Agreed. However, it might be a good idea to have *one* canonical
variable name fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.1-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.9-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, P
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > >We had a chicken[¹]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
> > >[¹] Technically sp
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 13:42 +0100 schrieb David Paleino:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:38:07 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Mons
On 01/03/08 19:48 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> There seems to be some crazyness about packaging new stuff these
> days. That would be fine.if only our existing packages were well
> maintained.which, for many of them is certainly not true.
Just for the record: every single package Rafa
Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 11:24 +0100 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le lundi 10 mars 2008 à 01:45 -0800, Mike Bird a écrit :
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > "needed" has several similar but distinct meanings. None of the meanings
> > is more obvious than any other. "Need" I remind you that if you had taken
Am Dienstag, den 15.04.2008, 22:58 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> FTFBS on packages build-depending on libqt4-dev
> ---
>
> If your package is build-depending on libqt4-dev and is currently failing
> to build from sources, please wait for the next qt
Am Freitag, den 25.04.2008, 13:16 +0700 schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
> Twas brillig at 10:56:18 25.04.2008 UTC+08 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> j> By the way, it would be great if the mirrors kept more than just a
> j> week of Diffs. It seems every time I get back from a trip, I
Am Freitag, den 16.03.2007, 20:11 +0900 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Instead of a GUI or a web interface, what I would love to have is a
> > curses-capable version of reportbug. As someone mentioned elsewhere in this
> > thread, browsing
Hi,
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 02:45:07 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:09:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Jun 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> What I was trying to show is that the relevance of a copyright case
> brought against you in a jurisdiction outside of
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 08:51:56 schrieb Arnoud Engelfriet:
Thanks for finding an english text.
> Just see EC Regulation 44/2001:
> "A judgment given in a Member State is to be recognised automatically, no
> special proceedings being necessary unless recognition is actually
> contested. A declara
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 09:08:31 schrieb Frank Küster:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:08:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> And a mail like
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350624;msg=142;att=0
> is not only not-helpful-at-all, it's real
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 14:20:40 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > You could ask Anthony whether you're allowed to publish his reasons on
> > -legal. That would do the project a great favor.
>
> You could just ask me directly you know...
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:02:13 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Am I misunderstanding what you're saying? octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> > this exact documentation that upstream is distributing.
>
> Yes, but built from source, and the source of octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> the texinfo so
Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 08:29 +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:49:40 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> No, really. The kernel team are volunteers. Ordering them to do things
> >> doesn't help
Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:04:21AM +0000, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 08:29 +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:49:40 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG
> > >
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:06:29PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:03 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Unfortunately, those who contribute to Debian must be dedicated to
> > > ensuring future releases of Debian support the
Am Mittwoch, den 22.10.2008, 08:36 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > At least ipw2100 drivers changed firmware name if they required
> > different version, so I guess this is also used by others...
>
> If they need an incompatible one.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:47:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:15:44PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > You are missing my point. We[1] got a reject for a documentation PDF
> > without source. So, we contacted upstream who checked the copyright with
>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote:
> We've come up with a better solution, which is to add dependencies to
> the apertium package, and then make the apertium package depend on a
> particular version of pcre3. It's safer this way, as I can't find out
> anything about comp
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 27 October 2008 19:35, Frank Küster wrote:
> > If the PDF is frozen documentation, it's probably worth the effort. If
> > upstream changes the PDF with every new version, you should ask them for
> > their sources in
Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2008, 01:48 -0500 schrieb William Pitcock:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.
>
> Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian?
"Thus, although non-fr
Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 00:31 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:23:18PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Debian Project Secretary (13/12/2008):
> >>
> >>FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE Lenny Release General Resolution
> >>= === = === === = ===
Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> I've been talking with Manoj already, in private to try and avoid
> flaming. I specifically asked him to delay this vote until the
> numerous problems with it were fixed, and it was started anyway. I'm
> *really* not happy with that,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.12.2008, 22:51 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:04:05AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> > I am really speechless The French seem to have a completely
> > different understanding of the English language used in all these
> > matters than almost
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:31:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:11:25AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > No, the problem is that certain of our French developers *think* that the
> > > rest of the world just doesn't understand t
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:23:33PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I am asked to act as a sponsor of phpunit [*] package. However there's
> a situation that needs an advice. There's JS in the package that was
> run through the filter which deletes comments and spaces. In fact it
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2007, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> E.g. a good example of how it's nice to have the code in one place (as
> opposed to dozens of debian/rules files) is that just recently I learned about
> a neat x11 framebuffer server wrapper,
Which package is that? I mi
Am Montag, den 17.09.2007, 20:33 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > according to
>
> >http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=blitz%2B%2B
>
> > there is no libatlas.so.3 available for arm which prevents blitz++
Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2007, 00:00 +0900 schrieb Michal Čihař:
> Hello
>
> Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:46:46 +0200
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > > BTW: When mentioning CMake, are there any known problems with p
Am Montag, den 14.01.2008, 10:41 + schrieb Colin Tuckley:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > Source, as we ship the source too. For the (C)/license checks in NEW it
> > (*nearly*) doesn't matter if you ship it in the binary package or not.
>
> R
Am Montag, den 14.01.2008, 17:22 +0530 schrieb Kumar Appaiah:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Right, so a source tarball repack is needed.
> >
> > Which blas package is this? The one from netlib?
>
> Yes. Please see the late
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 23, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 14:43 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > > Using non-PIC code for a 5% speed up looks like an acceptable trade off
> > > to me, but it really must be restricted only
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:32:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 23, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > You have x86 hardware that is so old that it doesn't run amd64, but at
> > the same moment you care about speed?
> Why should I not care about speed if the h
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:45:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Weber wrote:
> > You have x86 hardware that is so old that it doesn't run amd64, but at
> > the same moment you care about speed?
>
> It's not particularly hard to find new hardware with 32 bit A
Hi,
I'm cc'ing debian-devel, so people see that there is an answer. If
whoever wants to continue the discussion, please strongly consider
dropping debian-devel -- the list is noisy enough.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I, a maintainer of TeXmacs,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:38:49PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Zitat von Marc Haber :
>
> Directly from www.debian.org (english, then German, then translated back):
> "it comes with over 25000 packages, precompiled software bundled up in a
> nice format for easy installation on your machine."
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:59:25 +0200
> Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:43:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > > On 05/24/2010 11:05 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> I think the announcement is wrong, we cannot ever
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:45:30PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > How many packages are we talking about here? Is there a way to get the
> > number of packages that have the same version in Lenny and Squeeze?
>
>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:59:59PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I am more concern about advanced users of scientific computing software
> (Scilab, R, Octave...) which are familiar with such tools but not
> familiar enough with the internals.
> They just see these software as a whole and would n
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:42:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I don't see what a discussion on -devel@ would bring. We are unlikely to
> come up with a better choice of solutions than what we already have
> (keep it on by default, revert the change and make it disabled by
> default).
Maybe thi
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse side,
> but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our
> volunteers to spend more time on it.
This is not a question of spending time. An up
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:20:49AM +0100, Anthony F McInerney wrote:
> Would the people who are claiming that blank cdr are cheaper than dvdr,
> especially in third world countries, please cite sources (shops, price
> checkers etc) of the price of say 5 pack or 10 pack, even up to 50pack of
> CD's,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > Also ive offered my resignation in the past.
> > I do still offer to resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it
> > resolves this split between FFmpeg and Libav and make everyone work
> > together again. I never understood why pe
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Where/how to apply to become a co-maintainer and a maintainer? The
> packages I'm interested into start with are: gnuradio and octave.
Octave is group-maintained, the group's list is at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:08:07AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >Am I missing some trick to make them useful?
>
> You miss pkgkde-symbolshelper written by the fabulous Modestas Vainius
> which is available in pkg-kde-tools.
>
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html
I'm currently crea
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:49:06PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-01-26, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > I'm currently creating symbol files for Octave in Debian. And quite
> > frankly, the way symbol files for C++ libraries are handled and
> > (especially) documen
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev
> >
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think it should be in every report. reportbug currently adds the kernel
> version and what /bin/sh points to, and for both of those it can just as
> well be argued that they are not relevant to the majority of bug reports.
> For t
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:03:00PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about
> > /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports?
>
74 matches
Mail list logo
