say something like:
"The end is neigh!"
It is a dark, dark day for Debian, indeed.
--
Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sending to the list.
--
Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
me calling
-1 hyperbole
+1 semi-on-topic
--
-1 shouldn't have sent
--
Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:37 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Sid, apt-get wants to remove hotplug.
>
> Is udev replacing it for good or this is just b0rken?
>
> .Alejandro
Don't do it. See the previous thread titled 'udev'.
Your mouse will no longer work.
There's a new version of ud
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:54 pm, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hm, doesn't just manually loading mousedev (and putting it in
> /etc/modules) get things working again?
That's not the only problem:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332905
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On Monday 10 October 2005 02:27 pm, you wrote:
> Also, did anyone try a ipw2100 or ipw2200 with this? Will
> /etc/hotplug/firmware agent still work by loading the firmwares with no
> additional action from the driver code?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332946
--
I use digital
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:54 pm, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hm, doesn't just manually loading mousedev (and putting it in
> /etc/modules) get things working again?
Also note that libgphoto2-2 (upon which much of the desktop metapackages
depend) will conflict with the new udev-0.070-3 until a NM
According to various press releases [1], it seems that Sun is relaxing
their redistribution license for Java. I know very little about the
historical releases that the JRE has been kept out of Debian but wasn't
it because the license was too restrictive?
If so, does this mean that Java is now i
8 matches
Mail list logo
