On 7 Jan 1998, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> AucTeX is listed as orphaned in wnpp; I'm willing to take over its
> maintenance if nobody objects.
I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
TeX/LaTeX distribution of choice. Of course TeX/LaTeX is so darn
complicate
.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]for public PGP Key
> http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
Britton
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
coming from the NSA audited carefully before being included.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On F
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> from the secret journal of Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
> > are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
>
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
Britton Kerin
ess to the community is
questionable.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
Britton Kerin
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Hans Reiser wrote:
> It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
>
> Stallman never imagined that anyone in the free softw
I would like to reactivate my debian developer account.
Ive been MIA for a while unfortunately, but have now
rearranged my life so I have time to program for fun
again.
Is there a standard procedure for doing this that
someone can point me to?
Thanks,
Britton Kerin
--
Britton Kerin
[EMAIL
best served by our dumping the packages. If we had a way
to flag such packages 'deprecated' or
'very-buggy-your-on-your-own-if-you-try-this-one' (obviously we'd have
to
think of some better names :) it would prevent new users from being
misled
into trying the package w
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
ago, as described here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html
so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
Is the procedure described above still the right one?
Thanks,
Britton
--
Britton Kerin
[
is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
RealPlayer packaged also, though it would have to go in
non-free of course.
I saw an old resolved RFP for helix, but searching in synaptic
doesn't show up any matches for helix.
Britton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I thought I saw some stuff on their web page about helix being GPL now.
Not so?
Britton
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:14:39 +0100, "Daniel Baumann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Britton Kerin wrote:
> > is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
> >
and the OpenGL wrappers they presumably do?
If people make a fork to add ++, break, and continue, and everyone uses
them, will B. Meyer finally become slightly less uptight and embrace
them
as well? :)
Britton
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:48:22 +0200, "Daniel Baumann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
reinstated?
It gets a bit irritating to be totally ignored after taking the time to
answer all the questions on the reinstatement test. If random
volunteers
aren't worth bothering with thats fine, but don't ask them to spend
their
time and then ignore them.
Sincerely,
Britton Kerin
r that there are
derivative distros that resist systemd and encourage debian to *allow*
them, assuming people are willing to do the work. *Not* allowing this is
the politics-driven position.
Britton
the
> list masters to block you from ever posting again if this behaviour
> continues.
>
> As I don't think anything new will come up, I'm closing this bug report.
> Don't reopen it, this might just expedite your fate.
Yeah no more debian for me in future. That last comment is priceless.
Britton
Package: general
Severity: normal
If debian is remotely serious about keeping non-systmed use an option,
is should support a nosystemd build profile. There's no other real
way to guarantee that packages don't use it. Sure they don't *have*
to link against it, but in practice many will and this i
Got a new laptop after 10 years of excellent stable ancient debian,
and my wireless works from gnome, and only from gnome. Unfortunately
I find that gnome3 is not for me. I've been trying dwm.
No combination of nmcli ifconfig iw ip rfkill unblock wpa_supplicant
/etc/network/interfaces etc. that
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On May 22 2016, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> Got a new laptop after 10 years of excellent stable ancient debian,
>> and my wireless works from gnome, and only from gnome. Unfortunately
>> I find that gnome3 is not for me.
7
DHCPOFFER from 192.168.43.1
DHCPACK from 192.168.43.1
bound to 192.168.43.103 -- renewal in 1698 seconds.
root@debian:/home/bkerin# ping www.google.com
PING www.google.com (216.58.194.164) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from sfo07s13-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.194.164): icmp_seq=1
ttl=52 time=105 ms
Britton
ugh. E.g. I have no idea how
debian even
handles the udev issue for sysvinit systems, and at the moment I can't afford
to break a bunch of stuff finding out.
debian should not sell itself short and imagine that this new stack is better
than all the infrastructure it built up over the years for doing mostly the
same stuff.
Britton
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping
>> binary had the suid bit set. Now I get:
>>
>> $ ping www.google.com
&g
21 matches
Mail list logo
