Theodore Ts'o said:
>
> My system (currently running unstable, but it from the your description
> it sounds like it may be happening on sarge as well) has an
> apache2/mysql/php4 combination which blows up the moment you try to open
> a connection to a mysql database.
Are you sure you're note expe
Gunnar Wolf said:
>
> Adam: Is there a reason for keeping PHP3 in the archive?
It has users. One of those users recently let me know that he continues
to use it, because it "just works". For the curious, that user also
happens to be a member of the security team. I won't reveal his name, in
cas
ith a
default user env...
... Adam Conrad
-Original Message-
From: Eray Ozkural (exa) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Eray Ozkural (exa)
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 9:46 PM
To: Aaron Lehmann
Cc: Eray Ozkural (exa); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#81396:
Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> I'd like to know this, too. I recently fixed some bugs on
> m68k (a painful experience) and the most recent bug reports are basically
> "the bug you closed is reoccurring". If the compiler I'm using to test my >
fixes is different than the one used to build the package, t
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> That sounds backwards. "Component" is the one recognized by apt, and
> (naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
> Debian archive.
"Components: updates/main updates/contrib updates/non-free" [1]
... Adam
[1] http://klecker.debian.org/debian-security/d
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
>
> Debian Apache Maintainers
>apache2
apache2 will be f
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> - Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
> stand up and get it back to life?
> - Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
> - Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups: Do you agree? :)
> - In any other case: Othe
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:00:31AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:26:48AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > You could obviously just fall back to using the full .so in the case of
> > initramfs generation.
If we can detect that the libc generated is unsuitable, then
Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> Why exactly is this? Is this really the correct behavior? Shouldn't
> dpk-buildpackage be invoked using the -B option?
It is. `dpkg-buildpackage -B' invokes debian/rules clean, build, binary-arch.
... Adam
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
> keyserver.debian.org.com
Wildcard DNS. Try "foo.bar.org.com" or
"this.hostname.cant.exist.org.com", it all goes to the same place.
... Adam
Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >>>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
> > Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
>
> Current as of when? When the upload was done?
Current as of when libgcc1 froze the shlibs, which was r
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
>
> On one of my servers, apache segfaults when php4 loads the
> imap.so module.
> I have a few servers with similar versions, and only one of
> the servers
> experiences the segfault.
Check incoming in an hour or two. Or your local mirror around this time
tomor
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> PowerPC's fixed. m68k is a whole other problem.
They were both fixed as of today's dinstall run, actually.
... Adam
Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> This works fine when the locales exist for each localisation, but if
> they don't exist, it defaults to C locale/US-ASCII charset. Can the
> autobuilders guarantee a full set of generated locales, or is only C
> available?
Autobuilders don't even have "locales" installed b
them?
It was discussed on IRC with both 2.16 and 2.17 with you, among other
people. I gave a stab at fixing some of it, but my BSD/pthreads know-
how wasn't up to the task. You're right that I didn't mail the list,
however.
> > For the Debian glibc maintainers, Adam Conrad
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider
> that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was known that two
> architectures were going to FTBFS, without a real try to get that fixed
> (for example by
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:30:16PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2013/12/3 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
>
> > Would this be a Qt problem related to the emulator or the the toolkit
> > itself?
>
> That was a comment done by Canonical folks, iirc Adam Conrad, talking
&g
17 matches
Mail list logo
