Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-08-25 08:43:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 23:19 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > I run > > > > $ drt-tools process-excuses > > > > once a day (except during VAC or when I am not in front of a box with my > > Debian keys). That schedules binNMUs for all packages

Looking for new maintainer(s) for GStreamer packages

2022-08-25 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi! Currently I'm the only maintainer for the GStreamer packages, basically all on this list here:   https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=gstreamer...@packages.debian.org I'm not planning to maintain them (or any of my other packages) further in the near future but will keep things running s

Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all On 25-08-2022 02:43, Paul Wise wrote: I don't think Build-Architecture header is done yet? Neither do I. Although since we build all arch:all packages on amd64 machines now I don't think this is needed for throwing away NEW binaries? In testing and on release architectures, I'm only

Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > In testing and on release architectures, I'm only aware [1] of one that > can't build arch:all+arch:any binaries on amd64 (cmucl), but even that > one builds its arch:all binaries on amd64. I'm wondering if there are > packages where this i

Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:13:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > In testing and on release architectures, I'm only aware [1] of one that > > can't build arch:all+arch:any binaries on amd64 (cmucl), but even that > > one builds its arch:all bin

Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:06:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > The patch for dropping NEW binaries has been in dak for two years but > > its configuration options were never enabled by ftp-master so far. > > Dinstall::ThrowAwayNewBinarySuites > > Dinstall::ThrowAwayNewBinaryComponents > I would b

Re: Need a buildd build after trip through NEW -- best practice?

2022-08-25 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 24 Aug 2022 at 12:09AM GMT, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 04:59:10PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote: >> Commonly, I update a package that provides a shared library. Due to the >> package naming convention, a new SOVERSION necessitates a trip through NEW, >> which in

Bug#1018100: ITP: liblanguage-detector-java -- Language Detection Library for Java

2022-08-25 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org,debian-j...@lists.debian.org * Package name: liblanguage-detector-java Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Nakatani Shuyo, Francois ROLAND, Fabian Kessler,

Work-needing packages report for Aug 26, 2022

2022-08-25 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1261 (new: 10) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 177 (new: 2) Total number of packages reque

Current NEW review process saps developer motivation [Was: Looking for new maintainer(s) for GStreamer packages]

2022-08-25 Thread Gard Spreemann
On August 25, 2022 10:52:56 AM GMT+02:00, "Sebastian Dröge" wrote: >PS: To preempt any questions as for why, the background for my decision >to stop maintaining any packages is this thread, but it's really just >the straw that broke the camel's back > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail