Re: Epoch bump for kernelshark

2021-05-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 03:17:10PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > On 5/23/21 8:34 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > And, as a result, upstream kernelshark is now at v2.0 but the Debian > > packaged version is at v2.9.1 and I will need to add an epoch to the > > version to package it directly from its

Bug#989085: ITP: gamescope -- micro-compositor for games

2021-05-25 Thread Stephan Lachnit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stephan Lachnit X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, stephanlach...@debian.org.com * Package name: gamescope Version : 3.8.1 Upstream Author : Pierre-Loup A. Griffais * URL : https://github.com/Plagman/gamescope * License

Re: Planning for libidn shared library version transition

2021-05-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2021-05-24 Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi! This is for post-bullseye, but I appreciate guidance if anyone has > time. Shared library version transitions trigger uncertainty in me. > I want to upload a new upstream libidn release into Debian, but upstream > has done a shared library transition.

Bug#989101: ITP: libliftoff -- lightweight hardware composer library for libdrm

2021-05-25 Thread Stephan Lachnit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stephan Lachnit X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, stephanlach...@debian.org * Package name: libliftoff Version : 0.0.0~git20210430.799 Upstream Author : Simon Ser <~emersion/public-in...@lists.sr.ht> * URL : https:

Re: Epoch bump for kernelshark

2021-05-25 Thread David Bremner
Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 03:17:10PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: >> On 5/23/21 8:34 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> > And, as a result, upstream kernelshark is now at v2.0 but the Debian >> > packaged version is at v2.9.1 and I will need to add an epoch to the >> > version t

Re: Epoch bump for kernelshark

2021-05-25 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 20:04:04 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo writes: > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 03:17:10PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > >> On 5/23/21 8:34 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >> > And, as a result, upstream kernelshark is now at v2.0 but the Debian > >> > packaged versio

Re: Planning for libidn shared library version transition

2021-05-25 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 19:43:21 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2021-05-24 Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Generally, does things looks okay? Specifically, what about the > > Breaks/Replaces/Conflicts? The d/changelog entry? Will the confusing > > 'Replaces: libidn11-dev' for the libidn11 (!) pack

Re: Bug#989068: ITP: object-cloner -- Java Object cloning library with extensible strategies

2021-05-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 20:08:57 -0400, James Valleroy wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: James Valleroy > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jvalle...@mailbox.org > > * Package name: object-cloner > Version : 0.2 > Upstream Author : Kamran Zafar >

Re: Planning for libidn shared library version transition

2021-05-25 Thread Simon Josefsson
Andreas Metzler writes: > On 2021-05-24 Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Hi! This is for post-bullseye, but I appreciate guidance if anyone has >> time. Shared library version transitions trigger uncertainty in me. > >> I want to upload a new upstream libidn release into Debian, but upstream >> has d

Re: Bug#989068: ITP: object-cloner -- Java Object cloning library with extensible strategies

2021-05-25 Thread James Valleroy
On 5/25/21 7:53 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 20:08:57 -0400, James Valleroy wrote: >> >> * Package name: object-cloner > > The source package seems overly generic, could you namespace it > please? Say name it to what I assume might end up being the binary > name «libobject-