FTP-Master Review Process

2020-03-29 Thread Michael Lustfield
Hello fellow masochists, ... err, I mean Debian Developers, There has been a lot of talk lately about the FTP-Masters team and how some issues should be fixed. Back in December, I alluded to a proposal that I was working on. I hoped to get a little further into writing source prior to this point,

Re: FTP-Master Review Process

2020-03-29 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi fellow devs, Just appending some of my side notes: Michael's ftpmaster-proposal shares some common motivations with my previous mail ("Intermediate representation ... license review"), and we basically reached in an agreement on the problems existing in our FTP-master working (NEW) process. Th

Bug#955297: ITP: python3-clickhouse-driver -- Python driver with native interface for ClickHouse

2020-03-29 Thread Federico Ceratto
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Federico Ceratto * Package name: python3-clickhouse-driver Version : 0.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Marilyn System, Konstantin Lebedev * URL : https://github.com/mymarilyn/clickhouse-driver * License : MIT Programming Lang

Re: RFC: Standardizing source package artifacts build paths

2020-03-29 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 09:23:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > I'm concerned about a leading . at least for: > > * the debian/tmp replacement > * the replacement for the package install directories under debian. > > I think that maintaining those directories such that ls shows them will > be more fri

Re: RFC: Standardizing a new Protected field

2020-03-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 10:23:36 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Summary > --- > > The goal of the following proposal is to standardize a field to split > part of the Essential packages, and add support for it in the package > management stack. There is currently an Important field, that has

Bug#955306: ITP: libperl-minimumversion-fast-perl -- Find a minimum required version of perl for Perl code

2020-03-29 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: wnpp Owner: Dominique Dumont Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libperl-minimumversion-fast-perl Version : 0.18 Upstream Author : tokuhirom * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Perl-Min

Re: trimming changelogs

2020-03-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 00:50:29 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase, it looks like we forgot > a big pile of junk: /usr/share/doc/ As has been mentioned on the thread, this is IMO a non-issue, as these pathnames can be trimmed automatically with dpk

Re: RFC: Standardizing source package artifacts build paths

2020-03-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 29, Guillem Jover wrote: > While it's true that we might need to use such pathnames in debian/rules > or debhelper fragment files (which some might consider ugly), IMO that > has always felt like a sign that there's something missing in our > packaging helpers/tools. If you believe this th

Re: RFC: Standardizing source package artifacts build paths

2020-03-29 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 22:48:04 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 29, Guillem Jover wrote: > > While it's true that we might need to use such pathnames in debian/rules > > or debhelper fragment files (which some might consider ugly), IMO that > > has always felt like a sign that there's something

Overinterpretation of DFSG? QR code for receiving donation is non-free???

2020-03-29 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi fellow devs, I think sometimes the DFSG has been over-interpreted. Here I'm talking about the recent REJECTion of src:smartdns from our NEW queue, where QR code pictures used for donation have been deemed DFSG non-free [1]. I'm not satisfied with the explanation, and I think there is over-inter

Re: Overinterpretation of DFSG? QR code for receiving donation is non-free???

2020-03-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hello Mo, Le lundi, 30 mars 2020, 07.54:23 h CEST Mo Zhou a écrit : > I think sometimes the DFSG has been over-interpreted. Here I'm talking about > the recent REJECTion of src:smartdns from our NEW queue, where QR code > pictures used for donation have been deemed DFSG non-free [1]. I'm not > sat

Re: Overinterpretation of DFSG? QR code for receiving donation is non-free???

2020-03-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:54 AM Mo Zhou wrote: > * > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smartdns/-/blob/master/doc/alipay_donate.jpg > * > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smartdns/-/blob/master/doc/wechat_donate.jpg In addition to the QR codes, these both contain images of what look like telev