On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:32:09PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest this recommendation could be of the same strength as
> > the "use salsa" recommendation, i.e., weaker than the dh recommendation,
> > and directed at people with no reasons to prefer either who are
> > wonderin
> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille writes:
Andreas> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:32:09PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> > I'd like to suggest this recommendation could be of the same
>> strength as > the "use salsa" recommendation, i.e., weaker than
>> the dh recommendation, > and d
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 06:07:46AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Tille writes:
>
> Andreas> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:32:09PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >> > I'd like to suggest this recommendation could be of the same
> >> strength as > the "use salsa"
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 09:49:26PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2019, 13:40 + schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
>
> [snip]
> > If forcing machine-readable copyright is required for UMEGAYA,
> > then I’m sorry to say I will be removing debian/upstream/metadata
> > from some of
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> If you're rebuilding a package which is already in the archive, you're
> supposed to take the .orig.tar.xz from the archive, and if not, you're
> supposed to generate it with git archive (or with the shortcut for that
> command: .
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:37:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Theodore Y. Ts'o" writes:
>
> > Yes, and that's why I use debian/master instead of debian/buster or
> > debian/bullseye. :-)
>
> > When I do create debian/buster (once it became the stable branch), the
> > first thing I did after
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Graham Leggett
* Package name: tarmux
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Graham Leggett
* URL : https://github.com/minfrin/tarmux
* License : ASL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : A tool to multiplex and demultip
gregor herrmann dixit:
>On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:08:56 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> optimising for writing these files, I don't think we should be expecting
>> people to come up with a package-specific reason if they find themselves
Thanks.
>> I'd like to suggest this recommendation could be of th
Andreas Tille writes:
> From time to time I hear this statement. I can confirm that in all
> teams I'm working on pristine-tar belongs to the team policy and I never
> experienced in those > 2000 packages I've touched any problem with this.
> For me this makes some statistically relevant set whi
On 11/13/19 1:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Except for not agreeing with your opinion about pristine-tar I agree that
> debian/gbp.conf is frequently not very helpful and flooded with unneeded
> options sometimes. It really makes sense to use ~/.gbp.conf instead.
This was the single and only poin
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 5:23 AM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/11/19 12:50 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > It is absolutely not possible to set the correct
> > pristine-tar=True/False in ~/.gbp.conf to work with your packages
> > (which avoid pristine-tar) and the vast majority of gbp packages in
> > D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
* Package name: org-html-themes
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/fniessen/org-html-themes
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Org_style_markdown, HTML, CSS, js vs Debian'
12 matches
Mail list logo
