Bug#904575: ITP: vanguards -- Additional protections for Tor Onion Services

2018-07-25 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth" * Package name: vanguards Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Mike Perry * URL : https://github.com/mikeperry-tor/vanguards * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Additional prot

Bug#904577: ITP: stylus -- stylus manager to customize web sites with themes and skins

2018-07-25 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Smirnov X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: tags -1 help Control: affects -1 stylish Package name: Stylus Version: 1.0.0 License: GPL-3+ URL: https://add

Bug#904591: ITP: libproc-fastspawn-perl -- module to fork+exec, or spawn, a subprocess as quickly as possible

2018-07-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Package: wnpp Owner: Lucas Kanashiro Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name    : libproc-fastspawn-perl   Version : 1.2   Upstream Author : Marc A. Lehmann * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Proc-FastSpawn

Bug#904593: ITP: libio-fdpass-perl -- module to pass a file descriptor over a socke

2018-07-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Package: wnpp Owner: Lucas Kanashiro Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name    : libio-fdpass-perl   Version : 1.2   Upstream Author : Marc A. Lehmann * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass * License

Bug#904594: ITP: libanyevent-fork-perl -- module to create new processes

2018-07-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Package: wnpp Owner: Lucas Kanashiro Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name    : libanyevent-fork-perl   Version : 1.31   Upstream Author : FIXME * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/AnyEvent-Fork * License  

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:15:12PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: As a pre-amble side-note, some issues of offending users with homophobic language have been addressed upstream, and I think we should aim to carry these patches in stable/testing/unstable. (I don't think we have processes for patch

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:40:25 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: >> On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> > accept that they are authoritative in this regard. Therefore, you should >> > rename the offensive parts of

Bug#904613: ITP: golang-layeh-gopher-luar -- simplifies data passing to and from gopher-lua

2018-07-25 Thread Jongmin Kim
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jongmin Kim X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: golang-layeh-gopher-luar Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Tim Cooper * URL : https://github.com/layeh/gopher

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:40:25 -0700, Steve Langasek > wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > >> On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > >> > accept that they are authoritative in

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:18:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Staying compatible with the rest of the world is not covered by our > > core principles? > > It is covered. We explicitly list a number of things that we consider to b

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Ole Streicher
Marc Haber writes: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:40:25 -0700, Steve Langasek > wrote: >>On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: >>> He certainly should NOT rename any parts of the package without upstream >>> consent. >> >>Your "should not" does not follow from any of Debian's c

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 09:25:11PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Marc Haber writes: > > Staying compatible with the rest of the world is not covered by our > > core principles? > > Obviously we renamed packages (which made us incompatible with the rest > of the world) already if needed. Rememver

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:56:10 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:18:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It is covered. We explicitly list a number of things that we consider to be > > of higher priority than arbitrary compatibility with third parties (free > > software; our

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:55:50AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:56:10 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:18:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It is covered. We explicitly list a number of things that we consider to > > > be > > > of higher p

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread duck
Quack, On 2018-07-25 22:35, Jonathan Dowland wrote: I think it would be worthwhile to file a BTS bug so it can be easily tracked which versions of the package we distribute still carry this bug, so I will do that. Agreed, we should ensure all fixes are in all versions and I'd be glad to have

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-25 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Adam Borowski - 25.07.18, 21:56: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:18:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > Staying compatible with the rest of the world is not covered by > > > our > > > core principles? > > > > It is covered. We expli