Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Johannes Schauer writes ("Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?"): > does anybody plan to use sbuild in Stretch with Debian Squeeze or older > chroots? Yes. > I would like to remove some code from sbuild which is only useful > for chroots with very old apt inside

Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?"): > Johannes Schauer writes ("Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze > or older chroots?"): > > does anybody plan to use sbuild in Stretch with Debian Squeeze or older > > chroots? > > Ye

Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > does anybody plan to use sbuild in Stretch with Debian Squeeze or older > > chroots? > > Yes. I'm actually not doing Debian packaging for it, but at work there still are embedded machines running Lenny, where upgrading is simply no

How to distinguish .udeb files from regular .deb files?

2016-08-19 Thread Philipp Hahn
Hello, I accidentally called "dpkg-name" on some *.udeb files and they got renamed to .deb. Looking inside dpkg-name, it tries to evaluate "Package-Type" [1], but that is not contained in the control file of the binary package, so always evaluates to "deb": > 123 my $type = $fields->{'Package

Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-08-19 14:04:40) > And to those others who replied, I would like to point out that answers of > the form "oh no surely they don't" to questions like Johannes's can be > harmful. I read their answers as: "I don't think it is necessary for sbuild to support a distributi

Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Johannes Schauer writes ("Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?"): > Old sbuild will not help you. The problem is mainly, that older > chroots contain an apt installation that has no support for the > [trusted=yes] option in sources.list. This in turn means that

Bug#834819: ITP: openvpn-systemd-resolved -- integrates OpenVPN with systemd-resolved

2016-08-19 Thread eug...@debian.org
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eugene Zhukov *Package Name: openvpn-systemd-resolved Version: 1.1.1 Upstream Author: Jonathan Wright *URL: https://github.com/jonathanio/update-systemd-resolved *License: GPL Description: integrates OpenVPN with systemd-resolved This is a helper script

Bug#834825: ITP: glbinding -- cross-platform C++ binding for OpenGL

2016-08-19 Thread Ghislain Antony Vaillant
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant * Package name: glbinding Version : 2.1.1 Upstream Author : CG Internals GmbH * URL : https://github.com/cginternals/glbinding * License : Expat Programming Lang: C++ Description : cross-p

Re: Does anybody plan to keep using sbuild with Squeeze or older chroots?

2016-08-19 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-08-19 14:25:52) > (Would it not be possible to generate the key inside the chroot? I > guess there are probably other problems with that.) that would require lots of time and entropy - unless somebody knows how to trick gpg to generate a private/public key pair from

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 18 August 2016 at 18:17, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > On 2016-08-18 16:27:23, Luke W Faraone wrote: >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Luke W Faraone >> >> * Package name: powershell >> Version : 6.0.0~alpha9 >> Upstream Author : Microsoft >> * URL : https:/

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 2016-08-19 15:34:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 18 August 2016 at 18:17, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > > Most likely I'm missing something but what's the use case for Powershell on > > Debian? > > On more practical note - there is a bunch of tooling and cmdtets to > manage remote service from po

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
On August 19, 2016 10:44:44 AM EDT, Marcin Kulisz wrote: >Ha, so we're trying lure Windows admins to Debian under the pretence of >'you >can do the same from Debian' and then quietly make them drop >proprietary >platforms. Sounds like a good plan to me. Embrace, extend, extinguish? ;-) -- Harl

Bug#834835: RFP: ShogiGUI -- GUI for japanese Chess (Shogi)

2016-08-19 Thread A.H.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: ShogiGUI Version: 0.0.6.1 Upstream Author: [shogix...@gmail.com] Can't figure out who the author is. URL: [http://shogigui.siganus.com/]

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Mario Lang
Christoph Egger writes: > Marcin Kulisz writes: >> Most likely I'm missing something but what's the use case for Powershell on > > I don't know, what's the usecase for tcsh or lua? tcsh is to support legacy scripts, but, very good question: What *is* the use-case for Lua actually? :-) -- CYa,

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Zlatan Todoric
On 08/19/2016 08:15 PM, Mario Lang wrote: Christoph Egger writes: Marcin Kulisz writes: Most likely I'm missing something but what's the use case for Powershell on I don't know, what's the usecase for tcsh or lua? tcsh is to support legacy scripts, but, very good question: What *is* the

Bug#834865: ITP: libjs-jquery-selectize.js -- Extensible jQuery-based custom select UI control

2016-08-19 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior * Package name: libjs-jquery-selectize.js Version : 0.12.2 Upstream Author : Brian Reavis * URL : https://github.com/selectize/selectize.js * License : Apache-2.0 and Expat Programming Lang: JavaS

Bug#834866: ITP: python-whitenoise -- static file serving for WSGI applications

2016-08-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Antonio Terceiro * Package name: python-whitenoise Version : 3.2.1 Upstream Author : David Evans * URL : http://whitenoise.evans.io * License : MIT/Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : static file serving

Bug#834869: ITP: keysafe -- back up secret keys to cloud servers

2016-08-19 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sean Whitton * Package name: keysafe Version : 0.20160819 Upstream Author : Joey Hess * URL : https://joeyh.name/code/keysafe/ * License : AGPL-3 Programming Lang: Haskell Description : back up secret keys to clo

Re: Bug#834756: ITP: powershell -- scripting language interpreter built on .NET

2016-08-19 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > On 2016-08-18 16:27:23, Luke W Faraone wrote: >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Luke W Faraone >> >> * Package name: powershell >> Version : 6.0.0~alpha9 >> Upstream Author : Microsoft >> * URL : h