On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Brian May wrote:
> What package should I file it against? systemd?
Yes, systemd.
> What about other packages that call systemctl in postinst/postrm scripts
> without first checking that systemd is operational? Is the fault in the
> script that calls systemctl, or
On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:20:11 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Brian May wrote:
>> What about other packages that call systemctl in postinst/postrm scripts
>> without first checking that systemd is operational? Is the fault in the
>> script that calls systemctl, or systemctl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian X Strike Force
X-Debbugs-Cc: libin...@package.debian.org
* Package name: xserver-xorg-input-libinput
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://www.x.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang:
Hi Julien,
2015-05-01 19:47 GMT+02:00 Julien Cristau :
> It would be nice to see a template of your proposed mass filing.
https://titanpad.com/hL2sxANh1Y
--
Cheers,
Luca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Luca Falavigna writes:
> Hi Julien,
>
> 2015-05-01 19:47 GMT+02:00 Julien Cristau :
> > It would be nice to see a template of your proposed mass filing.
>
> https://titanpad.com/hL2sxANh1Y
Better to have it in a message in this forum for context. The document
at the above URL has this text::
==
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:07:56AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:46:25PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > (aka: I don't see why a debug
> > package has to depend on the package it provides symbols for at all. If
> > any the relation should be 'Enhances'…).
>
> The inte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-fog-local
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Wesley Beary
* URL : https://github.com/fog/fog-local
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Module for the 'fog' gem
On 2014-05-29 17:19:50, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>
> > are you looking for new volunteers?
>
> I'm not a Debian sysadmin but yes, new volunteers are needed for
> patch-tracker.d.o.
>
> Requirements are that you need to be a Debian member, but y
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 02:50:17PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Resurrecting this year-old thread. I guess the patch tracker is still
> down, right?
It is, yes.
> Browsing a few random packages seems to work correctly, although
> without an extensive test suite I don't know how well the code works
On May 02, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Could we:
>
> Freeze in 6-8 months
> Release in 10-12 months
I fear that such a short release cycle would strongly disincentive many
commercial vendors from supporting Debian systems: it already happened
to Fedora.
There is also the problem that oldoldol
Hi Iustin,
Funny you bring this up now - few hours ago I again had a need for the
patch-tracker (for most elegantly pointing an upstream to an issue) and
wondered what might the problem with this service.
Quoting Iustin Pop (2015-05-03 14:50:17)
> Resurrecting this year-old thread. I guess the
On 2015-05-03 15:31:28, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 02:50:17PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > PS: Long-term, the current codebase needs some redoing - e.g. it uses
> > cheetah as templating engine, and that's not available under Python 3,
> > etc.
>
> I very much agree. This
Thanks for your prompt answer, Iustin,
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> So:
>
> - we could have the current patch tracker resurrected easily as a stop
> gap measure; not sure what the policies are around debian.org
> services, but from the point of view of just th
On 2015-05-03 18:32:03, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Thanks for your prompt answer, Iustin,
>
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > So:
> >
> > - we could have the current patch tracker resurrected easily as a stop
> > gap measure; not sure what the policies are aroun
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 22:11:18 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> A) Use ".deb" (i.e. the regular extension) with a new "section".
Is there any problem with using the existing "debug" section? Or is
the different section used to distinguish that these are autogenerated
perhaps?
> B) Use ".dde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jason Pleau
* Package name: lua-messagepack
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Francois Perrad
* URL : http://fperrad.github.io/lua-MessagePack/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Lua
Description : a pure Lua imple
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
* Package name: kronometer
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : Elvis Angelaccio
* URL : http://www.aelog.org/kronometer
* License : GPL-2+
Description : stopwatch application for KDE
Kronom
On 20/04/15 at 00:22 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
> status of the architectures in unstable.
>
> Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
> therefore looking at their future in unstable.
18 matches
Mail list logo
