Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package name: fonts-seto
Version: 6.20
Upstream Author: 瀬戸のぞみ (Nozomi Seto)
URL: http://setofont.sourceforge.jp/
License: OFL
Hello,
sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively rebuilding
all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent version numbers
across architectures before releasing Jessie?
I understand that in testing or unstable, rebuilding for all platforms
every time a single on
Hi Marc,
On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively rebuilding
> all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent version numbers
> across architectures before releasing Jessie?
[...]
> A few random packages that current
On 11/01/2014 at 07:38 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
>> sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively
>> rebuilding all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent
>> version numbers across architectures before
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively rebuilding
all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent version numbers
across architectures before releasing Jessie?
[.
Hi!
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 11:45:56 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively rebuilding
> all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent version numbers
> across architectures before releasing Jessie?
That's something for the release-team
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Wolfgang Fuetterer
* Package name: calculix-ccx
Version : 2.7
Upstream Author : Guido Dhondt
* URL : http://www.calculix.de/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Fortran
Description : CalculiX CrunchiX is a three
+++ Marc Glisse [2014-11-01 11:45 +0100]:
> Hello,
>
> sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively
> rebuilding all "Multi-Arch: same" packages that have inconsistent
> version numbers across architectures before releasing Jessie?
I don't know, but I think there should be. Tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-default-value-for
Version : 3.0.0.1
Upstream Author : Hongli Lai, Phusion
* URL : https://github.com/FooBarWidget/default_value_for
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descripti
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> - Debian should ship a default set of firewall rules. Are we the only
> distro which doesn't do this? I mean a basic ruleset which drops
> incoming, accepts outgoing and accepts related,establised is so easy to
> do... and
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 13:17:11 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Fixed CC and M-F-T addresses, and bounced to debian-release. ]
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 11:45:56 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > sorry for the naive question, but is there a plan for massively rebuilding
> > all "Multi-Arch:
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
I plan to open 10 other bugs like #767710 about packages that install
a symbolic link to a file with the same name in both /bin/ and
/usr/bin/, this way preventing a conversion to everything-in-usr.
The changes are very simple and I will provide patches at least for
the most common packages.
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
