Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: feedgnuplot
Version : 1.20
Upstream Author : Dima Kogan
* URL : https://github.com/dkogan/feedgnuplot
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : A pipe-oriented frontend to gn
Le 31/08/2012 20:29, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 15:23:53 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> Stephen Gran writes:
>>
>>> Why not add logging to the Makefile, or cat debian/mini-proveall.out or
>>> something? This doesn't look like a dead end to me.
>>>
>>
Serge writes:
> 2012/8/30 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>>> How do you suppose it's possible to undo arbitrary network
>>> configuration done by arbitrary set of tools when there's no central
>>> place to hold such information (and can't possibly be)?
>>
>> Actually, the kernel holds that information.
Le 31 août 2012 10:06, "Josselin Mouette" a écrit :
>
> Le vendredi 31 août 2012 à 04:18 +0300, Serge a écrit :
> > 2012/8/10 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Because being able to choose between alternatives for core features
such
> > > as the init system only brings more bugs and no added value.
>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 30 août 2012 à 22:19 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > > How do you suppose it's possible to undo arbitrary network
> > > configuration done by arbitr
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:57:10PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 06:55 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > How is that different from having a botched / or /boot ? Why do you
> > think having a separate /usr will make / less prone to HD crashes?
> > You have / on RAID5 while /usr isn't?
> >
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: zfs-linux
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: C
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> This package contains the source code for the native implementation of ZFS
> for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that local kernel
> modules are automatically built and installed every time the kerne
Hi,
On 01.09.2012 20:02, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> This package contains the source code for the native implementation
> of ZFS for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that
> local kernel modules are automatically built and installed every time
> the kernel packages are upg
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: spl-dkms
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
On 01/09/12 20:36, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01.09.2012 20:02, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation
>> of ZFS for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that
>> local kernel modules are automatically built and insta
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Since you're talking of software RAID and LVM, that means you need an
> initramfs to boot your system. Thus, your systems will continue to
> boot with the proposed scenario, which supports booting with /usr on a
> separate filesystem if you have an initramfs.
Using softwar
On 01/09/12 20:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation of ZFS
>> for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that local kernel
>> modules
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 19:34 +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/8/31 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Linux is still not about choice? Then let's make it be about choice!
>
> > As for Debian not being universal, this is certainly not my saying.
> > But toy ports and toy init systems are part of what makes Debian
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 14:35 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> See Policy §7.2. If the depended-on package is not "required for the
> depending package to provide a significant amount of functionality"
> but is a package which "would be found together with the [depending
> package] in all but unusual in
Hi Matthew,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:25:09PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Since you're talking of software RAID and LVM, that means you need an
> > initramfs to boot your system. Thus, your systems will continue to
> > boot with the proposed scenario, which suppor
Svante Signell wrote:
>On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 19:34 +0300, Serge wrote:
>> 2012/8/31 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
>> Linux is still not about choice? Then let's make it be about choice!
>>
>> > As for Debian not being universal, this is certainly not my saying.
>> > But toy ports and toy init systems
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:39:14PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 03:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - /usr on a separate filesystem without the use of an initramfs: not
> >supported... and no discernable user demand for this.
> Well, let's say I have a big crash, a
Le Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:02:06PM +0200, Svante Signell a écrit :
>
> Maybe you, Josselin, should step down from working on Debian. It looks
> like your priorities are not in line with the Debian goals and the
> Debian contract any longer. Whatever the consequences will be.
In general I am for d
I demand that Thomas Goirand may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Sure, OpenRC doesn't have (yet) all the features of systemd. But because of
> the above, it might be worth to *at least* give it a chance.
Should it have all of those features? Should it require support from other
packages? (Are
I demand that Steve Langasek may or may not have written...
[snip]
> The Fedora implementation does not require us to drop support for /usr as a
> separate filesystem. It only requires us to ensure /usr is mounted before
> init is started.
>
> - /usr as a separate filesystem mounted from an ini
On Sep 2, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Thomas Goirand may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
>> Sure, OpenRC doesn't have (yet) all the features of systemd. But because of
>> the above, it might be worth to *at least* give it a chance.
>
> Should it have all of those
+++ Faidon Liambotis [2012-08-11 03:48 +0300]:
> On 08/11/12 01:12, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > There are choices that we don't support because the process of supporting
> > that choice would involve far more work than benefit, and the final goal
> > is excellence, not choice for its own sake. For exa
Darren Salt writes:
> I've carefully avoided use of initramfs images; I don't plan to start using
> them just so that /usr can be mounted early.
>
> You can call it irrational or whatever else you like; I don't care.
[..]
>
> For me, the presence of an initramfs is a downside when I've been able t
24 matches
Mail list logo
