On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 09:53:00PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Yes, this would send the XF86ScreenSaver which would kick the
> screensaver of the currently displayed X session. This is another
> (imperfect) way to solve the problem of locking the user's screen
> without needing either an entry i
* Betr.: " Bug#680817: tryton-proteus: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named
dateutil.relativedelta" (Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:49:30 +0200):
Hello,
I want to ask according to Debian policy [1] about a Pre-Depends with respect to
the following build problem of proteus.
To know the proteus version, setu
* Mathias Behrle , 2012-07-09, 11:17:
I want to ask according to Debian policy [1] about a Pre-Depends with
respect to the following build problem of proteus.
To know the proteus version, setup.py imports __init__.py from
subfolder proteus, which itself imports classes depending on python
mod
> Ben Hutchings writes:
[...]
> - twm: no-one should have to suffer this
And, exactly, why not? Before I've switched to Openbox, it was
one of the two WM's I've used, along with FVWM. And they say
[1] that it still can be handy at times.
The “obscure” lab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* Package name: be-shell
Version : git
Upstream Author : Thomas Lübking
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/be-shell/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : lightweight kde she
Le Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:12:44PM -0600, Joey Hess a écrit :
>
> grub-legacy is still used for multipath and sataraid.
> Something was going to be done to make grub2 support those, but
> I don't know the status.
Hi,
Grub-legacy is also useful for booting virtual machine images with pv-grub
(suc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: bader.dan...@mytum.de
Package name: librg-liu-bundle-perl
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Jinfeng Liu
URL : ftp://rostlab.org/free/librg-liu-bundle-perl-1.0.2.tar.gz
License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Descr
In article <20120708235244.gb24...@thunk.org> Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Matthew Garret believes that this is a requirement; however, there is
> no documented paper trail indicating that this is actually necessary.
> There are those who believe that Microsoft wouldn't dare revoke a
> Linux key because of t
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> In article <20120708235244.gb24...@thunk.org> Ted Ts'o wrote:
> > Matthew Garret believes that this is a requirement; however, there is
> > no documented paper trail indicating that this is actually necessary.
> > There are those w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:26:49PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Hey, it's hardly my fault that nobody else bothered turning up to the
> > well-advertised events where this got discussed...
>
> If it's documented on paper, it didn't h
❦ 9 juillet 2012 10:06 CEST, Michael Meskes :
>> Yes, this would send the XF86ScreenSaver which would kick the
>> screensaver of the currently displayed X session. This is another
>> (imperfect) way to solve the problem of locking the user's screen
>> without needing either an entry in /var/run
Adam Borowski writes ("Re: duplicates in the archive"):
> "Breaks unrelated software" on the system is a RC severity, and there's no
> way one can say a windowing environment is related to core networking.
> Thus, I'd say, #542095 needs to be upgraded -- and changing Depends: to
> Recommends: is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: benjamin.drex...@googlemail.com
* Package name: librg-pp-bundle-perl
Version : 1.0.27
Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan
* URL : http://rostlab.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : PP perl modules
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:22:58PM -0600, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Ansgar has been experimenting with .deb sizes to make the packages
> needed for a minimal desktop installation fit in the first CD. It looks
> like that's doable by switching to xz compression for the involved
> binaries. Would
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes ("Re: duplicates in the archive"):
> > "Breaks unrelated software" on the system is a RC severity, and there's no
> > way one can say a windowing environment is related to core networking.
> > Thus, I'd say, #54209
(English)
Hello all,
I have installed Debian Wheezy on my computer and I have followed the
maint-guide (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/) using the
sources gentoo-0.19.13 I previously have downloaded.
I have practiced with devhelper and does not seem very complicated.
(Following the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:56:31 +0200
jose antonio wrote:
> That said, I would like to ask if do you think I could help them to
> maintain some gtk++ program by way of introduction? or should I finish
> first the manual and create a small application?
It needs to be a package which will sustain you
Hi,
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:58:16 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> • xz -6 (the default) is a lot slower when compressing, fast when
> decompressing, needs only 10MB memory, 58% size
> • xz -9 has very slow compression, takes gobs of memory, 56% size
> (Obviously, the "size" numbers are dra
On Jul 09, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OK, I misunderstood the problem. I thought the difficulty was to fire
> the screensaver on the behalf of the active user. Isn't the information
> about running a power management software available through DBus?
The whole point of this discussion indeed is to no
El lun, 09-07-2012 a las 19:46 +0100, Ian Jackson escribió:
> Adam Borowski writes ("Re: duplicates in the archive"):
> > "Breaks unrelated software" on the system is a RC severity, and there's no
> > way one can say a windowing environment is related to core networking.
> > Thus, I'd say, #542095
Hello Scott,
Scott Kitterman escreveu isso aí:
> It looks like there are more than a few Ruby packages that aren't update for
> the new packaging scheme and still expect Ruby 1.8 as the default.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676092 is an example. If we
> weren't in freeze
On Monday, July 09, 2012 11:16:35 PM Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> Scott Kitterman escreveu isso aí:
> > It looks like there are more than a few Ruby packages that aren't update
> > for the new packaging scheme and still expect Ruby 1.8 as the default.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Scott Kitterman writes:
> OK. Thanks. I can file the RM bug for that one.
> In general though should these be forced to build with ruby 1.8 (since
> they generally have ruby1.8 in the binary name or should they be coerced
> into producing a package that works with ruby1.9, but is called ruby1.
On Monday, July 09, 2012 08:08:37 PM Russ Allbery wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
> > OK. Thanks. I can file the RM bug for that one.
> >
> > In general though should these be forced to build with ruby 1.8 (since
> > they generally have ruby1.8 in the binary name or should they be coerced
> >
On Monday, July 09, 2012 11:00:12 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
...
> OK. Thanks. I can file the RM bug for that one.
...
For completeness, based on Russ Albrey's advice, that was a one line fix, so
I'm just going to fix the FTBFS and I'll let someone who can better explain why
it should be removed
25 matches
Mail list logo
