Re: Bug#617867: ITP: morse-coach -- Koch method Morse code trainer for GTK+ and Pulseaudio

2011-04-14 Thread Colin Tuckley
Quoting Karl Goetz : How does this relate to debians existing morse package? http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/morse The two programs use completely different methods of teaching the morse code. They are *not* just two different interfaces to similar programs. Colin G8TMV -- To UNSUBS

Re: Bug#622620: O: argyll -- Color Management System, calibrator and profiler

2011-04-14 Thread Roland Mas
Roland Mas, 2011-04-13 14:46:12 +0200 : > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I think it's time for me to stop pretending I have enough > time/energy/interest to properly maintain Argyll. I'm therefore > regretfully orphaning the package. I should add that any prospective adopter will most prob

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 > Roger Leigh wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> Following the discussion yesterday, I'd like to propose doing >> something like the example below.  It's possible to

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On to, 2011-04-14 at 10:44 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > And moreover for scientific computation /tmp need to be on an > harddisk. I do not want my 16GiB matric to go to memory when I have > only 8GiB of RAM That sounds like you'd be better off using /var/tmp instead, actually. > Please d

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 > > Roger Leigh wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > >> Following the discussion yesterday,

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:50:52AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 > Roger Leigh wrote: > > Proposal: > [...] > > /tmp: No default (use general tmpfs default of 20%) > > 20% doesn't seem like a lot for /tmp when people try and compile > something. While its not somet

Re: Request for testing: /run and initscripts

2011-04-14 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > I have now implemented this (though it's not the default). > > > > > > I would very much appreciate i

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 >> > Roger Leigh wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Rog

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Roger Leigh wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: >>> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 >>> > Roger Leig

Re: Bug#622620: O: argyll -- Color Management System, calibrator and profiler

2011-04-14 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:44:36 +0200 Roland Mas wrote: > Roland Mas, 2011-04-13 14:46:12 +0200 : > > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: normal > > > > I think it's time for me to stop pretending I have enough > > time/energy/interest to properly maintain Argyll. I'm therefore > > regretfully orphaning

Bug#622620: Info received (Bug#622620: O: argyll -- Color Management System, calibrator and profiler)

2011-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! Disclaimer: this is my last post on this matter (i.e. the meaning of RAMLOCK), it seems there is a problem with myself or my understanding. On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:42:58 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:35:37PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:47

Bug#622750: general: "shutdown -r" does not reboot

2011-04-14 Thread Christoph Pleger
Package: general Severity: normal Hello, when I am logged in (by ssh or on tty1-tty6) as root on the machine where I am writing this from and enter "shutdown -r now", the machine does not reboot, but instead I get the message: Give root password for maintenance (or press Control-D to continue):

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! Just to be sure everyone gets it correctly... On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:15:07 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > If it wasn't already clear, having /tmp as a tmpfs is a > /configurable option/, and it is /not/ the default (except when > root is read-only (ro) in fstab). Sorry, having /tmp as a t

Re: Bug#613209: O: jabberd14 -- Instant messaging server using the Jabber/XMPP protocol

2011-04-14 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 02/13/2011 03:45 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > In fact I'm wondering if I should ask its removal from the > archive. If nobody adopt it soon I'll ask for removal. I'd suggest to do so. There are enough and better alternatives. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Deve

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
fuser(1) In the postinst (or other) it seems you wish to know if your impacting things, are not all sure about the vserver situation, and are using stat(1) and test -L and etc. You might try fuser(1) so you are sure if /var/run will impact something. Luca Capello wrote: Hi there! Disclaim

watchdog

2011-04-14 Thread Bastian Blywis
Hello, I hope my general questions about the watchdog package belong on this list. 1) Is it really the desired behavior that wd_keepalive is started in /etc/init.d/watchdog when the watchdog daemon is stopped? If the system shall be kept from rebooting due to terminating the watchdog process, d

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
I'm reading (can't spend allot of time though, I'll try) initscripts_2.88dsf-13.3_amd64.deb sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.3.dsc I'm thinking (I'm not sure) that Bastien is working on this. He'd mentioned issues between sysinit and running on certain vservers. While reading scripts it re

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
I've noticed I have to check /etc carefully. Some rc.d scripts that packages install edit and or activate things in /etc (they make insertions into automatically actived scripts in /etc for ssh, ppp, perl, network (pre-ifupdown or what), exim, things or other possible phone home things). Whil

Bug#622750: general: "shutdown -r" does not reboot

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
I'm not a debian bug handler but... try "shutdown -t0 -r now" and re-submit if it doesn't work (I think specifying time is required?) Christoph Pleger wrote: Package: general Severity: normal Hello, when I am logged in (by ssh or on tty1-tty6) as root on the machine where I am writing this

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Marvin Renich
* Luca Capello [110414 06:43]: > Hi there! > > Disclaimer: this is my last post on this matter (i.e. the meaning of > RAMLOCK), it seems there is a problem with myself or my understanding. > > Either I do not read `man rcS` as you read it or we do not understand > each other, so here the situati

Bug#622750: general: "shutdown -r" does not reboot

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
dang I didnt' read all. you should only see that for entering runlevel one. are you sure you didn't reboot ? sulogin prints that message mabye it's because you specified no time? it is remotely possible new init scripts somehow get you to runlevel 1, init(1) invokes sulogin(1), and reboot i

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:15:07 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 > > > Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +01

Re: watchdog

2011-04-14 Thread Michael Meskes
> 1) Is it really the desired behavior that wd_keepalive is started in > /etc/init.d/watchdog when the watchdog daemon is stopped? If the system shall Yes. > be kept from rebooting due to terminating the watchdog process, does it not > suffice to close /dev/watchdog as it is documented in the

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
One last rc.d comment. (noting I use a variety but try to stick with latest) For 20 yrs. every time I try NFS during boot scripts, no matter which linux, I tend to get my linux frozen when nfs can't mount. I have yet to see an NFS that offers file access in a suitable manner (ie, error chec

Re: watchdog

2011-04-14 Thread Bastian Blywis
Thanks for the reply. > Why? Sorry, I'm not sure I actually understand what you're saying. wd_keepalive > is started to still have basic watchdog functionality without the additional > checks performed by the watchdog daemon. Does it actually perform some kind of checks? What I got from the doc

Re: Default size limits for /run (/var/run) and /run/lock (/var/lock)

2011-04-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:15:07 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100 > > > >

RE: DPL 2011: Final call for votes

2011-04-14 Thread Daniel Lane
Unsubscribe. Thank You, Dan Lane Senior Systems Administrator The American Board of Family Medicine, Inc. (859) 269-5626 - Ext. 1293 (859) 338-8734 - Cell Phone dl...@theabfm.org - Email "This email message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended re

Re: DPL 2011: Final call for votes

2011-04-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:04:43PM -0400, Daniel Lane wrote: > Unsubscribe. > > Thank You, > Dan Lane > Senior Systems Administrator > The American Board of Family Medicine, Inc. > (859) 269-5626 - Ext. 1293 > (859) 338-8734 - Cell Phone > dl...@theabfm.org - Email > "This email message and any at

Re: Request for testing: /run and initscripts

2011-04-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > I have now implemented this (th

Bug#622811: ITP: libvamsas-client-java -- Visualisation and Analysis of Molecular Sequences, Alignments and Structures

2011-04-14 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Fourmond * Package name: libvamsas-client-java Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Jim Procter and others * URL : http://www.vamsas.ac.uk/ * License : LGPL3 + Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : l

Re: network-manager as default? No!

2011-04-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 08:00 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit : > I think it is wrong, based on the fact expressed in these threads that > NetworkManager can, by default during upgrade, bring down the network > connection. This argument has been rehashed again and again, without ever confronting it to

Re: network-manager as default? No!

2011-04-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 à 11:39 +0200, Stephan Seitz a écrit : > My first (and last) contact with NM was not a good one. This is another misconception about Network-Manager: since version 0.6 (the first one with which people have been in contact to) was very badly designed, the current version