Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote, Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:24 AM On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: do you have updated devscripts? debsign signs the dsc then updates the md5 hash in the changes before signing that. It needs to update the sha checks as well. The latest d

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Will the devscripts in stable be updated to handle this? If so, when? >> If not, why not? > > (If you're looking for an answer from the maintainers of a package it's > probably safer to ask them directly rather than assuming they read every > post

Bug#476521: ITP: lua-orbit -- MVC framework for lua

2008-04-17 Thread Enrico Tassi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: lua-orbit Version: 2.0rc1 Upstream Author: Kepler project URL: http://orbit.luaforge.net License: MIT/X Description: MVC framewor

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:57:00PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:15:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > You are missing the point. > > > > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? > > But the library can't say "foo must come from a D

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said: > > You are missing the point. > > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? Which package is this? > The libarry does not use foo, only the user, so no depends? > Or idoes forcing users to use foo make foo part o

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:44:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? > >> > >> How does the library say that? Why can't I just have gcc -o baz baz.c > >> -lfoo > >> > >> How can the library make that not work? > > > By not s

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:58:44AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Yes, in the simple case, you can just do this. In the more complex > case (which upstream might want to cater for), you need to use > pkg-config. No. Even in this case, I _don't_ need to use pkg-config. I just should be able to p

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > How is this different with _any_ dependency on the system? Do you > suggest that iceweasel should drop its libgtk dependency, because users > might want to use their own compiled version of it? iceweasel _uses_ libgtk. A -dev package

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:21:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > According to the suggested definition, if a package using this library > > chooses to use foo-config, it doesn't call pkg-config directly (and it > > may not call it at all, this depends on the inner workings of > > foo-config). >

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:48:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote, Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:24 AM > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > >>do you have updated devscripts? debsign signs the dsc then updates the > >>md5 hash in the chang

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:58:44AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > >> Yes, in the simple case, you can just do this. In the more complex >> case (which upstream might want to cater for), you need to use >> pkg-config. > > No. Even in this case, I _don't_

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in one VM (for testing/reproducing/fixing bugs that I cannot reproduce in stable) and in some chroots. The po

yorick-yeti built on mips but not installed after two weeks

2008-04-17 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, One of my packages, [1]yorick-yeti has been [2]built successfully on all official platforms, including [3]mips on Fri 28 Mar, but the mips package is still [2]not installed on the archive. It is held out of Lenny for this reason. I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue 8 Apr to n

ADD me For Exchange

2008-04-17 Thread Life is full of choices.
ADD me For Exchange

${devlibs:Depends} results in libstdc++6-4.1-dev

2008-04-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when trying to update libgenome-1.3-1-dev I noticed that the variable ${devlibs:Depends} is turned into a dependency from a libstdc++6 which is shipped with gcc-4.1 instead of using libstdc++6-4.2-dev or even libstdc++6-4.3-dev. Quoting from my *.build log in an up to date pbuilder environme

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : >> IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few >> packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in >> one VM >> (for testing/reproducing/fixing bugs that I canno

Re: ${devlibs:Depends} results in libstdc++6-4.1-dev

2008-04-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 14:18:06 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when trying to update libgenome-1.3-1-dev I noticed that the variable > ${devlibs:Depends} is turned into a dependency from a libstdc++6 which > is shipped with gcc-4.1 instead of using libstdc++6-4.2-dev or even > libstdc++6-4

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17 avr. 08 à 14:25, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : The problem is the same with lintian, that you need to backport regularly. (Lintian being arch:all, of course, that's much easier). You do no

Re: Misc development news (#6) (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt)

2008-04-17 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hmm. Smells a lot like: Yes, it's the same, except eating less screen space; I don't particularly care how it ends up being implemented -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 02:25:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : > >> IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few > >> packages in Debian, the only places I run unstab

DDs using stable (Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed)

2008-04-17 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Roberto C. Sánchez [Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:04:39 -0400]: > IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few > packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in one VM > (for testing/reproducing/fixing bugs that I cannot reproduce in stable) > and in some chroots. S

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread James Vega
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:04:39AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:48:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > 2.10.25 should migrate to testing over the weekend, so hopefully a bpo > > package won't be too much longer. In the meantime it's fairly easy to > > backport

Re: DDs using stable (Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed)

2008-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:27:35PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Roberto C. Sánchez [Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:04:39 -0400]: > > > IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few > > packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in one VM > > (for testing/reproducing

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:34:06AM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > You're mixing stable and unstable tools. You have to expect that you may run > into incompatibilities I expect such a thing. For example, building packages with svn-buildpackage runs a 'debian/rules clean' before going into the chr

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread James Vega
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:34:06AM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > On the plus side, debsign is now more resilient to future changes in the > > Format of .changes files (as will mergechanges in the next upload). This > > only > >

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > This certainly good. However, perhaps dak should have been changed to > accept both format versions (1.7 and 1.8), instead of just rejecting the > old one right away. This could have been continued until some fixed > time after

Bug#476573: preinst fails on etch->sid dist-upgrade with old unopkg

2008-04-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: openoffice.org-voikko Version: 2.2-2 Severity: serious Unfortunately I didn't think about/notice this either, but a etch->sid dist-upgrade with openoffice.org-voikko involved now fails with the scriplets using -env. Stripped log from the dist-upgrade: Preconfiguring packages ... [...] P

Re: ${devlibs:Depends} results in libstdc++6-4.1-dev

2008-04-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Julien Cristau wrote: when trying to update libgenome-1.3-1-dev I noticed that the variable ${devlibs:Depends} is turned into a dependency from a libstdc++6 which is shipped with gcc-4.1 instead of using libstdc++6-4.2-dev or even libstdc++6-4.3-dev. Quoting from my *.build

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote: that we have developers who can't pay attention to debian-devel-announce. ... or rather who pay attention but are to stupid to parse it correctly to obtain this very piece of information. Feel free to call me stupid because to failied to see a connection

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:06:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > This certainly good. However, perhaps dak should have been changed to > > accept both format versions (1.7 and 1.8), instead of just rejecting the > > old one

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

2008-04-17 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 10:38:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Will the devscripts in stable be updated to handle this? If so, when? > >> If not, why not? > > > > (If you're looking for an answer from the maintainers of a package it's > > p

Neu: Handbuch Gesundheitswesen im Umbruch

2008-04-17 Thread eHealthCare . ch
Guten Tag Als Co-Heausgeber erlaube ich mir, Sie auf eine für das Gesundheitswesen einzigartige Neu-Publikation aufmerksam zu machen, mit besonderem Fokus Spitäler. Mit über 40 Fachautoren habe ich und meine 3 Co-Herausgeber versucht, den Umbruch der nächsten Jahre im Schweizer Gesundheitswes

Neu: Handbuch Gesundheitswesen im Umbruch

2008-04-17 Thread eHealthCare . ch
Guten Tag Als Co-Heausgeber erlaube ich mir, Sie auf eine für das Gesundheitswesen einzigartige Neu-Publikation aufmerksam zu machen, mit besonderem Fokus Spitäler. Mit über 40 Fachautoren habe ich und meine 3 Co-Herausgeber versucht, den Umbruch der nächsten Jahre im Schweizer Gesundheitswes

Work-needing packages report for Apr 18, 2008

2008-04-17 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 429 (new: 8) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 100 (new: 1) Total number of packages request

sumeh lasita wants to chat

2008-04-17 Thread sumeh lasita
--- sumeh lasita wants to stay in better touch using some of Google's coolest new products. If you already have Gmail or Google Talk, visit: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-e21bdacb68-9494b30a6d-dc92d96744032b8f You'll need to clic