On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
>> asking for a give-back on [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do the trick.
>
> What is the usual response time? I sended the mail 7 days ago.
In my experience, you may not get a response but ac
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:47:14AM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > Since I received a terrifying amount insults(!) via mail for not
> > implementing this feature request after my last blog entry, where I
> > asked for help developin
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
What is the usual response time? I sended the mail 7 days ago.
In my experience, you may not get a response but action will be taken
anyway.
Well, I was asking because
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=wordnet
did not changed since one
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:21:25AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > A few things: why is it called "tcpwatch" when it only watches HTTP
> > requests? A better name would be "httpwatch".
>
> it's named that way by upstream. I want to keep confusion to a minimum
> and don't see much benefit in renami
On 18.12.2007 03:47 schrieb David Nusinow:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Why was I opposed to implement this.
>>
>> 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj
>> text, which I doubt anyone reads anyway. Since I don't want rng to be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: thaifonts-arundina
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Boonlert Wutikornkhanarak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linux.
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > I haven't implemented presubj text in my patch, so this is a non-issue
> > for that specifically.
>
> Yes, but I've merged this bug with a similar one where the reporter
> wanted rng to support presubj.
And presubj is the most important thin
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of
> 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj
> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
> 4. I was *personally* very annoyed
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On dim, déc 16, 2007 at 09:19:54 +, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Albin Tonnerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dvtm
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Anselm R. Garbe, Marc Andre Tanner
* URL : http://ww
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:24:39AM +, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >On dim, déc 16, 2007 at 09:19:54 +, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >>Package: wnpp
> >>Severity: wishlist
> >>Owner: Albin Tonnerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
> >>* Package name: dvtm
> >> Version
Hi,
On Sunday 16 December 2007 16:29, David Nusinow wrote:
>I'd appreciate some brief commentary on this bug from people who are
> more aware of the minutia of shells and so forth than I am. Is this really
> accurate, or is there a way that the submitter and myself are unaware of
> for setting
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
What would be the advantage i get by switching to your code?
Well if recent rote support multi byte encodings and have fixed their
handling of colors for rote launched inside rote, probably not a lot.
The color issue is probably still present.
I think I understand
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:32:02AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:40:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if you look at the buildd report for latest wordnet on sparc at
> >
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=wordnet&ver=1%3A3.0-6&arch
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:29:33AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>I'd appreciate some brief commentary on this bug from people who are
> more aware of the minutia of shells and so forth than I am. Is this really
> accurate, or is there a way that the submitter and myself are una
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:06:21AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
> >> where a user has to do something before he can proceed reporting a bug.
> >> Sorry, but this won't happen in rng. I might consider such a thing if it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: wnpp
Version:
Upstream Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.dedalo-3d.com/index.php
License: GPL 3
Description: MakeHuman ©
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> On 18.12.2007 03:47 schrieb David Nusinow:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>>> Why was I opposed to implement this.
>>>
>>> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
>>> where a user has to do something before
Michael Biebl wrote:
> I need help with an RC against kdesvn.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454179
> In short:
> If the user runs the (amd64) version from the archive (0.14.1-1), it
> crashes with a SIBGUS error.
> I asked the user to recompile kdesvn with the nostrip option, t
Vincent Fourmond schrieb:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I need help with an RC against kdesvn.
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454179
>> In short:
>> If the user runs the (amd64) version from the archive (0.14.1-1), it
>> crashes with a SIBGUS error.
>> I asked the user to recompile
Hello,
I'm writing to all of you to let you know about an impending libclamav
soname transition. So long as your application doesn't use any private
structures or functions from clamav, you shouldn't need to do anything.
My first round of testing shows that all packages build from source
against
Wow, that's the first Debian installer that made it all the way
through on this machine.
Thanks!
--alan
On Dec 13, 2007 2:38 AM, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:00, Alan Ezust wrote:
> > True, I *can* install debian, except that I was trying t
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> Well, for my own needs, emdebian-tools and apt-cross. Every bug report
> against apt-cross would have benefited from getting answers to the
> questions that are now deployed in the bug script (that is why the
> questions are in the bug script). I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libxapool-java
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Experlog
* URL : http://xapool.experlog.com
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : connection pooli
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:19:25 +0100
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Well, for my own needs, emdebian-tools and apt-cross. Every bug report
> > against apt-cross would have benefited from getting answers to the
> > questions that are
Kris Deugau writes ("Re: Syslog file paths in 'metalog'? (#423299)"):
> Literally and exactly that - I want to be able to tell it to put
> daemon.* in /var/daemonlogs/mainlog, mail.info in
> /var/mailbits/mail.info, mail.debug in /tmp/debuglogs/maildebug.log, and
> just to be perverse (and more
"Leo \"costela\" Antunes" writes ("Re: Please don't list available translations
in the package description"):
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this information.
> It may reduce the objectiveness of some
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have read quite some bug scripts today. I am kind of wondering (maybe
> > jsut
> > my imagination being limited) why you aren't just unconditionally including
> > those data instead of
> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
> where a user has to do something before he can proceed reporting a bug.
> Sorry, but this won't happen in rng. I might consider such a thing if it
> could be scripted to use QT or even GTK but a terminal popping up in a
> G
Hi,
I've just finished porting svgalib to non-i386/amd64 systems, I think
it should build at least on sparc, mips, powerpc. I've not tested on
other boxes but except for alpha it should build on mostly everything.
I'd appreciate if someone could test on any arch (except alpha and the
current supp
From Bug#456977:
Steve Langasek commented while closing this bug report:
>
> It is recommended that you use apt-listchanges on your system, to be
> notified of package behavior changes such as this.
Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges so that
it is installed by defaul
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
$ fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest
Major opcode of failed request: 144 (GLX)
Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate)
Serial number of failed request: 41
Current s
31 matches
Mail list logo
