On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> - Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
> stand up and get it back to life?
> - Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
> - Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups: Do you agree? :)
> - In any other case: Othe
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:58:02 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Of course, before any action, I'd like to hear Thom's or Andres' points
> > of view.
>
> You probably want to hear my input too. :-)
>
> At Debc
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to add support for ARM binaries in
pstack. It replaces the x86 specific stuff with the ARM equivalent.
Currently it works only for target binaries which aren't compiled with
the thumb instruction set (the same goes for the shared libraries).
Note that pstack itself
I'm currently rewriting the perl support for cross-compiling in
Debian with two main aims:
1. Close some really, really, old bug reports against dpkg-cross
2. Stop calling `apt-cache` and use AptPkg::* instead via
'NorthernCross' - an unreleased cross-compiling support script
developed for Emdebi
* Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >
> > - Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
> > stand up and get it back to life?
> > - Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
> > - Pkg-perl and/or Apach
> * Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>> The debian-apache group has both the necssary perl, apache, and C skills
>> required to maintain this, what we're lacking at times (hey, check the
>> apache changelogs for my name recently... *sigh*) is the time.
>>
>> I'd be happy to see it in the deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dkimproxy
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Jason Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jason.long.name/dkimproxy/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Desc
Per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433852#20 I have
made a debhelper script. Though as I have made it, I have some
questions (see attached file):
1. should it go into debhelper, or should it be distributed in a new package?
2. how should language specific things be implemented, f
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500]:
> Hi all,
> (...)
> I'm sending this mail as an answer to #438168 - A user
> (understandably) fed up by what seems to be lack of attention to a
> package that is core to many people's work, libapache2-mod-perl2. I
> send this mail with some
(sry for the PM by accident)
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Carl Fürstenberg:
> Per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433852#20 I have
> made a debhelper script. Though as I have made it, I have some
> questions (see attached file):
>
> 1. should it go into debh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 436520 general
Bug#436520: apt-listbugs: does not work with $http_proxy
Bug reassigned from package `apt-listbugs' to `general'.
> retitle There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
S
reassign 436520 general
retitle There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this bug to Debian in general. I feel a Deja-Vu about
this, I thought I already discussed it somewhere but cannot find it
anywhere.
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many app
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
> applications within Debian.
>
> There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
> set to arbitrary values for CGI scripts, and thus there is a need
> for protection against th
Hi,
I need some guidance from library packaging gurus.
Libsoqt is a library that is currently linked with Qt3. I've had a
request to rebuild it with Qt4 instead (#415382) which can be done by
simply changing the configuration.
Can I simply upload the reconfigured shared library package, which
Hi,
> Or do I keep the SONAME but put it into a new package, like we do for
> the gcc ABI transitions? If so, is there a convention or do I just
> pick a suffix I like (e.g. qt4)?
If there're qt3 applications using your library, I think you should
build extra -qt4 packages and keep the qt3 packa
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
The boost library short name has changed semantics in Debian. Prior
to 1.34.0-1, the short name was multi-threaded. Now it is single
threaded.
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
Hello,
A new versio
I'm getting this warning when building csound:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of 'NEEDED libcsnd.so' not recognized
What does it mean and how can I fix it? man dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't say
anything, and I can objdump libcsnd.so without any trouble.
I tried to read the source and apparently it ca
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:41:17PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> I need some guidance from library packaging gurus.
> Libsoqt is a library that is currently linked with Qt3. I've had a
> request to rebuild it with Qt4 instead (#415382) which can be done by
> simply changing the configuratio
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:41:31AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I'm getting this warning when building csound:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of 'NEEDED libcsnd.so' not recognized
> What does it mean and how can I fix it? man dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't say
> anything, and I can objdump libcsnd.s
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
> > applications within Debian.
> >
> > There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
>
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 390 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 76 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:54:33PM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> Per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433852#20 I have
> made a debhelper script. Though as I have made it, I have some
> questions (see attached file):
I suggest to fill a wishlist bugreport against debhelper and d
22 matches
Mail list logo
